中华创伤骨科杂志
中華創傷骨科雜誌
중화창상골과잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA
2010年
8期
723-726
,共4页
常廷杰%唐康来%陈磊%曹洪辉%陶旭%李辉%周兵华%周建波%许建中
常廷傑%唐康來%陳磊%曹洪輝%陶旭%李輝%週兵華%週建波%許建中
상정걸%당강래%진뢰%조홍휘%도욱%리휘%주병화%주건파%허건중
距下关节%关节融合术%关节炎
距下關節%關節融閤術%關節炎
거하관절%관절융합술%관절염
Subtalar joint%Arthrodesis%Arthritis
目的 探讨单纯小切口经皮空心螺钉内固定行距下关节融合术治疗距下关节炎的临床疗效.方法 2006年1月至2009年12月对26例(27足)保守治疗6个月以上无效的距下关节炎患者行距下关节融合治疗,男13例,女13例;平均年龄38.7岁(26~73岁);左侧11足,右侧16足.其中创伤性关节炎16例16足,类风湿关节炎6例7足,骨关节炎4例4足.术前平均病程8.3个月(6~25个月).手术采用外侧约4 cm切口,通过经皮穿针平行钻入2枚空心螺钉予以固定.术前和末次随访时采用视觉模拟法(VAS)疼痛评分和美国足踝外科协会(AOFAS)踝与后足评分分别对疼痛和功能进行评估.同时采用X线摄片和CT扫描进行影像学评估. 结果 26例患者术后获平均18 5个月(6~47个月)随访.术前与末次随访时VAS疼痛评分分别为(6.9±0.7)、(1.5±0.3)分,差异有统计学意义(t=17.000,P=0.000);AOFAS踝与后足评分分别为(54.3±12.1)、(82.6±11.3)分,差异有统计学意义(t=6.308,P=0.000).术后X线片或CT示26例患者全部获骨性融合,平均融合时间为10.8周(10~14周). 结论 小切口经皮穿针空心螺钉内固定行距下关节融合术治疗距下关节炎具有创伤小、恢复快、并发症少等优点,易于推广.
目的 探討單純小切口經皮空心螺釘內固定行距下關節融閤術治療距下關節炎的臨床療效.方法 2006年1月至2009年12月對26例(27足)保守治療6箇月以上無效的距下關節炎患者行距下關節融閤治療,男13例,女13例;平均年齡38.7歲(26~73歲);左側11足,右側16足.其中創傷性關節炎16例16足,類風濕關節炎6例7足,骨關節炎4例4足.術前平均病程8.3箇月(6~25箇月).手術採用外側約4 cm切口,通過經皮穿針平行鑽入2枚空心螺釘予以固定.術前和末次隨訪時採用視覺模擬法(VAS)疼痛評分和美國足踝外科協會(AOFAS)踝與後足評分分彆對疼痛和功能進行評估.同時採用X線攝片和CT掃描進行影像學評估. 結果 26例患者術後穫平均18 5箇月(6~47箇月)隨訪.術前與末次隨訪時VAS疼痛評分分彆為(6.9±0.7)、(1.5±0.3)分,差異有統計學意義(t=17.000,P=0.000);AOFAS踝與後足評分分彆為(54.3±12.1)、(82.6±11.3)分,差異有統計學意義(t=6.308,P=0.000).術後X線片或CT示26例患者全部穫骨性融閤,平均融閤時間為10.8週(10~14週). 結論 小切口經皮穿針空心螺釘內固定行距下關節融閤術治療距下關節炎具有創傷小、恢複快、併髮癥少等優點,易于推廣.
목적 탐토단순소절구경피공심라정내고정행거하관절융합술치료거하관절염적림상료효.방법 2006년1월지2009년12월대26례(27족)보수치료6개월이상무효적거하관절염환자행거하관절융합치료,남13례,녀13례;평균년령38.7세(26~73세);좌측11족,우측16족.기중창상성관절염16례16족,류풍습관절염6례7족,골관절염4례4족.술전평균병정8.3개월(6~25개월).수술채용외측약4 cm절구,통과경피천침평행찬입2매공심라정여이고정.술전화말차수방시채용시각모의법(VAS)동통평분화미국족과외과협회(AOFAS)과여후족평분분별대동통화공능진행평고.동시채용X선섭편화CT소묘진행영상학평고. 결과 26례환자술후획평균18 5개월(6~47개월)수방.술전여말차수방시VAS동통평분분별위(6.9±0.7)、(1.5±0.3)분,차이유통계학의의(t=17.000,P=0.000);AOFAS과여후족평분분별위(54.3±12.1)、(82.6±11.3)분,차이유통계학의의(t=6.308,P=0.000).술후X선편혹CT시26례환자전부획골성융합,평균융합시간위10.8주(10~14주). 결론 소절구경피천침공심라정내고정행거하관절융합술치료거하관절염구유창상소、회복쾌、병발증소등우점,역우추엄.
Objective To discuss subtalar fusion with mini-incision and percutaneous cannulated screws for treatment of subtalar arthritis. Methods From January 2006 to December 2009, 26 patients (27 feet) underwent subtalar fusion due to serious subtalar joint arthritis which had not responded to conservative treatment for more than 6 months. They were 13 males and 13 females, with an average age of 38.7years (26 to 73 years) . The arthritis involved 11 left and 16 right feet, with a mean disease course of 8.3months (6 to 25 months). The subtalar joint was explored laterally by an incision of about 4 cm and fixed with2 percutaneous cannulated screws. All patients were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively by the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) scoring system for functions of the ankle and hind foot and by the visual analogue scale (VAS) score for pain. All patients were evaluated by X-ray and CT scan.Results All patients were followed up for 6 to 47 months (mean, 18.5 months). The VAS scores increasedfrom 6.9 ± 0.7 points preoperatively to 1.5 ± 0. 3 points postoperatively( t = 17. 000, P = 0. 000). The mean AOFAS ankle-hindfoot scores increased from 54.3 ± 12.1 points preoperatively to 82. 6 ± 11.3 points postoperatively( t = 6. 308, P = 0. 000). All patients got good fusion after a mean time of 10. 8 weeks ( 10 to 14weeks) . Conclusion The subtalar joint fusion with mini-incision and percutaneous cannulated screws may acquire good clinical outcomes, with minimal invasion, fast recovery and few complications.