中华放射肿瘤学杂志
中華放射腫瘤學雜誌
중화방사종류학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY
2012年
2期
172-175
,共4页
曹午飞%黄晓延%孙文钊%陈利
曹午飛%黃曉延%孫文釗%陳利
조오비%황효연%손문쇠%진리
分辨率%Gamma率%剂量分布验证
分辨率%Gamma率%劑量分佈驗證
분변솔%Gamma솔%제량분포험증
Resolution%Gamma rate%Verification of dose distribution
目的 探讨调强放疗验证中参考分布与被评估分布的分辨率对Gamma分析结果的影响.方法 设计4种不同类型的射野,使用TPS在水体模中计算并导出剂量分布的分辨率依次为1、2、3、4、5、6 mm.对不同取样分辨率采用IBA公司OmniPro-I' mRT软件计算Gamma指数.结果 当被评估分辨率一定时,参考分辨率的改变对Gamma通过率影响很小(调强射野5%以内);当参考分辨率一定时,Gamma通过率随被评估分辨率>1 mm范围内升高有升高趋[从6 mm升高至3 mm通过率升高(15.2±6.2)%(t=11.99,P<0.01),从3 mm升高至1 mm通过率升高(14.9±5.5)%(t=13.24,P<0.01)].结论 应用Gamma分析方法进行调强放疗剂量分布比较时,可将测量数据作为参考分布,无须插值;将治疗计划系统计算数据作为被评估分布,其分辨率选取1 mm较合适.
目的 探討調彊放療驗證中參攷分佈與被評估分佈的分辨率對Gamma分析結果的影響.方法 設計4種不同類型的射野,使用TPS在水體模中計算併導齣劑量分佈的分辨率依次為1、2、3、4、5、6 mm.對不同取樣分辨率採用IBA公司OmniPro-I' mRT軟件計算Gamma指數.結果 噹被評估分辨率一定時,參攷分辨率的改變對Gamma通過率影響很小(調彊射野5%以內);噹參攷分辨率一定時,Gamma通過率隨被評估分辨率>1 mm範圍內升高有升高趨[從6 mm升高至3 mm通過率升高(15.2±6.2)%(t=11.99,P<0.01),從3 mm升高至1 mm通過率升高(14.9±5.5)%(t=13.24,P<0.01)].結論 應用Gamma分析方法進行調彊放療劑量分佈比較時,可將測量數據作為參攷分佈,無鬚插值;將治療計劃繫統計算數據作為被評估分佈,其分辨率選取1 mm較閤適.
목적 탐토조강방료험증중삼고분포여피평고분포적분변솔대Gamma분석결과적영향.방법 설계4충불동류형적사야,사용TPS재수체모중계산병도출제량분포적분변솔의차위1、2、3、4、5、6 mm.대불동취양분변솔채용IBA공사OmniPro-I' mRT연건계산Gamma지수.결과 당피평고분변솔일정시,삼고분변솔적개변대Gamma통과솔영향흔소(조강사야5%이내);당삼고분변솔일정시,Gamma통과솔수피평고분변솔>1 mm범위내승고유승고추[종6 mm승고지3 mm통과솔승고(15.2±6.2)%(t=11.99,P<0.01),종3 mm승고지1 mm통과솔승고(14.9±5.5)%(t=13.24,P<0.01)].결론 응용Gamma분석방법진행조강방료제량분포비교시,가장측량수거작위삼고분포,무수삽치;장치료계화계통계산수거작위피평고분포,기분변솔선취1 mm교합괄.
Objective To study the impact of the resolution of reference dose distribution and evaluated dose distribution to Gamma rate in the verification of IMRT. Methods Designed four fields, the resolution of dose distribution calculated in water phantom and exported from TPS are 1 ,2,3 ,4,5,6 mm. To calculate Gamma index by IBA's OmniPro-I'mRT software in different sampling resolution. Results When the resolution of evaluated dose distribution was fixed, the change of reference dose distribution's resolution has little effect on Gamma rate (5% to IMRT field) ;When the resolution of reference dose distribution was fixed , the Gamma rate increased as the evaluated dose distribution's resolution ( > 1 mm) raise ( the Gamma rate increase ( 15. 2 ±6. 2) % ( t = 11. 99 ,P < 0. 01 ) and ( 14. 9 ± 5. 5) % ( t = 13. 24 , P < 0. 01 ) while the resolution of evaluated dose distribution changed from 6 mm t0 3 mm and from 3 mm to 1 mm respectively) .Conclusions To use Camma method for verification of IMRT, the measured data can be as a reference dose distribution without interpolation;the computed data by TPS can be as a evaluated dose distribution and it is more appropriate for the resolution of 1 mm.