中华行为医学与脑科学杂志
中華行為醫學與腦科學雜誌
중화행위의학여뇌과학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE AND BRAIN SCIENCE
2012年
8期
673-676
,共4页
赵传东%隋建峰%张荣伟%袁绍纪%姚娟%杨艺%许鹏
趙傳東%隋建峰%張榮偉%袁紹紀%姚娟%楊藝%許鵬
조전동%수건봉%장영위%원소기%요연%양예%허붕
延迟/痕迹双任务%眨眼条件反射%听觉惊吓反射%小鼠
延遲/痕跡雙任務%眨眼條件反射%聽覺驚嚇反射%小鼠
연지/흔적쌍임무%잡안조건반사%은각량하반사%소서
Dual delay-trace conditioning procedure%Eyeblink conditioning%Acoustic startle reflex%Mice
目的 研究昆明小鼠眨眼条件反射延迟/痕迹任务模型建立过程中听觉惊吓反射(ASR)与眨眼条件反射(CR)的行为学特征参数与变异.方法 15只健康昆明小鼠随机分成3组:单任务延迟眨眼条件反射(DEBC)组(n=5);单任务痕迹眨眼条件反射(TEBC)组(n=5);双任务延迟/痕迹组(n=5).采用不同音频( TEBC 2KHz,DEBC1KHz)的正弦波纯音作为条件刺激(CS),声音强度为85 dB.以100ms 束状氧气流作为非条件刺激(US)进行CS-US配对训练,观察实验各组行为学参数.结果 经过10d配对训练,惊吓反射率(ASR%):单任务组[第10天ASR%分别达到(38.00±8.64)%和(38.55 ± 12.41)%,时间效应F=4.574,P=0.008;组间效应F=2.021,P=0.193))与双任务组[第10天ASR%分别达到(47.95±14.23)%和(62.01 ±9.03)%,时间效应F=5,547 P=0.013;组间效应F=0.738,P=0.415))均随训练天数增加显著增加.习得率(CR%):单任务组[第10天CR%分别达到(45.4±5.39)%和(65.6±6.77)%,时间效应F=9.558,P=0.000;组间效应(F=5.117,P=0.054)与双任务组(第10天CR%分别达到(57.66±4.34)%和(77.35±7.36)%,时间效应F=7.750 P=0.002组间效应F=1.449 P=0.263))均随训练天数增加显著增加,两种模式间习得率未见明显差异.峰幅度(AP):DEBC组随训练天数增加而增加(时间效应F=2.679,P=0.017),双任务组随训练天数增加而增加(时间效应(F=3.452,P=0.034).峰潜伏期(TP)无任何显著差异.结论 昆明小鼠可以成功建立单任务与延迟/痕迹双任务眨眼条件反射,虽然行为参数表现出一定程度的变异,但采取相关措施可予以控制.
目的 研究昆明小鼠眨眼條件反射延遲/痕跡任務模型建立過程中聽覺驚嚇反射(ASR)與眨眼條件反射(CR)的行為學特徵參數與變異.方法 15隻健康昆明小鼠隨機分成3組:單任務延遲眨眼條件反射(DEBC)組(n=5);單任務痕跡眨眼條件反射(TEBC)組(n=5);雙任務延遲/痕跡組(n=5).採用不同音頻( TEBC 2KHz,DEBC1KHz)的正絃波純音作為條件刺激(CS),聲音彊度為85 dB.以100ms 束狀氧氣流作為非條件刺激(US)進行CS-US配對訓練,觀察實驗各組行為學參數.結果 經過10d配對訓練,驚嚇反射率(ASR%):單任務組[第10天ASR%分彆達到(38.00±8.64)%和(38.55 ± 12.41)%,時間效應F=4.574,P=0.008;組間效應F=2.021,P=0.193))與雙任務組[第10天ASR%分彆達到(47.95±14.23)%和(62.01 ±9.03)%,時間效應F=5,547 P=0.013;組間效應F=0.738,P=0.415))均隨訓練天數增加顯著增加.習得率(CR%):單任務組[第10天CR%分彆達到(45.4±5.39)%和(65.6±6.77)%,時間效應F=9.558,P=0.000;組間效應(F=5.117,P=0.054)與雙任務組(第10天CR%分彆達到(57.66±4.34)%和(77.35±7.36)%,時間效應F=7.750 P=0.002組間效應F=1.449 P=0.263))均隨訓練天數增加顯著增加,兩種模式間習得率未見明顯差異.峰幅度(AP):DEBC組隨訓練天數增加而增加(時間效應F=2.679,P=0.017),雙任務組隨訓練天數增加而增加(時間效應(F=3.452,P=0.034).峰潛伏期(TP)無任何顯著差異.結論 昆明小鼠可以成功建立單任務與延遲/痕跡雙任務眨眼條件反射,雖然行為參數錶現齣一定程度的變異,但採取相關措施可予以控製.
목적 연구곤명소서잡안조건반사연지/흔적임무모형건립과정중은각량하반사(ASR)여잡안조건반사(CR)적행위학특정삼수여변이.방법 15지건강곤명소서수궤분성3조:단임무연지잡안조건반사(DEBC)조(n=5);단임무흔적잡안조건반사(TEBC)조(n=5);쌍임무연지/흔적조(n=5).채용불동음빈( TEBC 2KHz,DEBC1KHz)적정현파순음작위조건자격(CS),성음강도위85 dB.이100ms 속상양기류작위비조건자격(US)진행CS-US배대훈련,관찰실험각조행위학삼수.결과 경과10d배대훈련,량하반사솔(ASR%):단임무조[제10천ASR%분별체도(38.00±8.64)%화(38.55 ± 12.41)%,시간효응F=4.574,P=0.008;조간효응F=2.021,P=0.193))여쌍임무조[제10천ASR%분별체도(47.95±14.23)%화(62.01 ±9.03)%,시간효응F=5,547 P=0.013;조간효응F=0.738,P=0.415))균수훈련천수증가현저증가.습득솔(CR%):단임무조[제10천CR%분별체도(45.4±5.39)%화(65.6±6.77)%,시간효응F=9.558,P=0.000;조간효응(F=5.117,P=0.054)여쌍임무조(제10천CR%분별체도(57.66±4.34)%화(77.35±7.36)%,시간효응F=7.750 P=0.002조간효응F=1.449 P=0.263))균수훈련천수증가현저증가,량충모식간습득솔미견명현차이.봉폭도(AP):DEBC조수훈련천수증가이증가(시간효응F=2.679,P=0.017),쌍임무조수훈련천수증가이증가(시간효응(F=3.452,P=0.034).봉잠복기(TP)무임하현저차이.결론 곤명소서가이성공건립단임무여연지/흔적쌍임무잡안조건반사,수연행위삼수표현출일정정도적변이,단채취상관조시가여이공제.
Objective To investigate the characteristic parameters and variation of acoustic startle reflex (ASR) and conditioning response (CR)during the acquisition of delay-trace eyeblink conditioning.Methods 15healthy Kunming mice were randomly divided into 3 groups:single-task DEBC group ( n =5 ) ; single-task TEBC group ( n =5) ; dual delay/trace group ( n =5).Three groups received paired training of tone conditioned stimulus(CS)in different audio frequency (TEBC groups:2KHz; DEBC group:1KHz) and a 100 ms comeal oxygenpuff unconditioned stimulus(US).Then observed the characteristic parameters of ASR and CR.Results After pairing training for 10 days,ASR rate( ASR% ) of single-task groups ( 10th day (38.00 ± 8.64) % and (38.55 ±12.41 ) % respectively,time effect:F =4.574,P =0.008 ; group effect:F =2.021,P =0.193 ) and dual delaytrace group ( 10th day (47.95 ± 14.23 ) % and (62.01 ± 9.03 ) % respectively,time effect:F =5,547 P =0.013 ;group effect:F =0.738,P =0.415) changed significantly with the following training but between single-task groups or dual delay-trace group.CR rate ( CR% ) of single-task groups ( 10th day were (45.4 ± 5.39) % and (65.6 ± 6.77) % respectively,time effect:F =9.558,P =0.000 ; group effect:F =5.117,P =0.054 ) and dual delay/trace group ( 10th day (57.66 ± 4.34) % and (77.35 ± 7.36) % respectively,time effect:F =7.750,P =0.002 ;group effect:F=1.449,P=0.263 ) showed obvious change with the following training but between singletask groups or dual delay-trace group.Peak amplitude of single-task DEBC group ( time effect F =2.679,P =0.017 ) and dual delay-trace group ( F=3.452,P=0.034 ) had increased significantly with the following training.Peak latency showed no obvious change.Conclusion Dual delay-trace conditioning procedure of classical eyeblink conditioning and single-task can be successfully established in Kunming mice.Although there are some variations,those can be controled and be weaken effect of them by taking targeted measures.