健康心理学杂志
健康心理學雜誌
건강심이학잡지
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY JOURNAL
2001年
1期
5-6
,共2页
腔隙性脑梗塞%焦虑%抑郁%不足综合征水平
腔隙性腦梗塞%焦慮%抑鬱%不足綜閤徵水平
강극성뇌경새%초필%억욱%불족종합정수평
目的 评定腔隙性脑梗塞病人的焦虑和抑郁。方法 病人于住院1周时评定抑郁量表(HAMD)、抑郁自评量表(CES-D)和焦虑量表(HAMA)，并与正常对照比较。结果 病人HAMD总分(8.23±5.58分)与对照组(7.63±3.42分)无显著差异；CES-D总分(16.2±9.67分)比对照组(8.23±7.75分)显著为高；HAMA总分(5.93±3.83分)与对照组(5.94±4.11分)无显著差异。结论 腔隙性脑梗塞病人存在不足综合征的抑郁；用CES-D比用HAMD更易检出不足综合征的抑郁；腔隙性脑梗塞病人在住院1周时未检出明显焦虑。
目的 評定腔隙性腦梗塞病人的焦慮和抑鬱。方法 病人于住院1週時評定抑鬱量錶(HAMD)、抑鬱自評量錶(CES-D)和焦慮量錶(HAMA)，併與正常對照比較。結果 病人HAMD總分(8.23±5.58分)與對照組(7.63±3.42分)無顯著差異；CES-D總分(16.2±9.67分)比對照組(8.23±7.75分)顯著為高；HAMA總分(5.93±3.83分)與對照組(5.94±4.11分)無顯著差異。結論 腔隙性腦梗塞病人存在不足綜閤徵的抑鬱；用CES-D比用HAMD更易檢齣不足綜閤徵的抑鬱；腔隙性腦梗塞病人在住院1週時未檢齣明顯焦慮。
목적 평정강극성뇌경새병인적초필화억욱。방법 병인우주원1주시평정억욱량표(HAMD)、억욱자평량표(CES-D)화초필량표(HAMA)，병여정상대조비교。결과 병인HAMD총분(8.23±5.58분)여대조조(7.63±3.42분)무현저차이；CES-D총분(16.2±9.67분)비대조조(8.23±7.75분)현저위고；HAMA총분(5.93±3.83분)여대조조(5.94±4.11분)무현저차이。결론 강극성뇌경새병인존재불족종합정적억욱；용CES-D비용HAMD경역검출불족종합정적억욱；강극성뇌경새병인재주원1주시미검출명현초필。
Objective To estimate anxious and depressive symptoms in patientswith lacuma cerebri infarction(LCI).Method It was estimated for Hamilton rating scale for depression(HAMD),Center for epidemiotogical survey,depression scale(CES-D) and Hamilton rating scale for anxiety(HAMA)in 35 patients with LCI when admitted hospital for one week.LCI group compared with normal control group from refernce in rating scores.Results HAMD total score was no different between LCI group(8.23±5.58)and normal control group(7.63±3.42)(P>0.05);CES-D total score was significantly higher in LCI group(16.2±9.67) than in normal control group(8.23±7.75)(P<0.001);HAMA total score was no different between LCI group(5.93±3.83)and normal control group(5.94±4.11)(P>0.05).Conclusion ①It existed a subsyndrome depression in patients with LCI.②It was easier detecting subsyndrome depression using CES-D than using HAMD.③It was not found for anxiety in patients with LCI when admitted hospital for one week.
