中国癌症防治杂志
中國癌癥防治雜誌
중국암증방치잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PREVENTION AND TREATMENT
2009年
2期
139-141
,共3页
李智勇%连其平%李嘉兴%李仲宏
李智勇%連其平%李嘉興%李仲宏
리지용%련기평%리가흥%리중굉
生物可分解吻合环%结肠癌手术%吻合术
生物可分解吻閤環%結腸癌手術%吻閤術
생물가분해문합배%결장암수술%문합술
Biodegradable anastomosis ring%Colon carcinoma%Clinical study
目的 通过前瞻性研究,评价生物可分解吻合环(biaframentable anastomosis ring,BAR) 在结肠癌手术中的临床应用价值.方法 将我院69例结肠癌手术病人随机分成二组,其中应用BAR作肠吻合33例(BAR组);用传统手工吻合36例(TMA组).对两组病人的平均手术和肠吻合时间、术后并发症,以及肠镜随访结果 进行比较.结果 两组病人均无死亡,均痊愈出院.BAR组的平均手术和肠吻合时间均明显少于TMA组;BAR组的术后并发症如吻合口出血、肠功能恢复时间、肺部感染均明显好于TMA组;BAR组无吻合口漏,而TMA组则有2例;3~6个月后的肠镜随访,结果 显示在吻合口溃疡、吻合口炎、吻合口肉芽肿等方面BAR组均明显好于TMA组.两组上述多项指标的差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05 或0.01).结论 应用BAR于结肠癌手术具有操作简便、快捷、疗效好及术后并发症少等优点.
目的 通過前瞻性研究,評價生物可分解吻閤環(biaframentable anastomosis ring,BAR) 在結腸癌手術中的臨床應用價值.方法 將我院69例結腸癌手術病人隨機分成二組,其中應用BAR作腸吻閤33例(BAR組);用傳統手工吻閤36例(TMA組).對兩組病人的平均手術和腸吻閤時間、術後併髮癥,以及腸鏡隨訪結果 進行比較.結果 兩組病人均無死亡,均痊愈齣院.BAR組的平均手術和腸吻閤時間均明顯少于TMA組;BAR組的術後併髮癥如吻閤口齣血、腸功能恢複時間、肺部感染均明顯好于TMA組;BAR組無吻閤口漏,而TMA組則有2例;3~6箇月後的腸鏡隨訪,結果 顯示在吻閤口潰瘍、吻閤口炎、吻閤口肉芽腫等方麵BAR組均明顯好于TMA組.兩組上述多項指標的差異均有統計學意義(P<0.05 或0.01).結論 應用BAR于結腸癌手術具有操作簡便、快捷、療效好及術後併髮癥少等優點.
목적 통과전첨성연구,평개생물가분해문합배(biaframentable anastomosis ring,BAR) 재결장암수술중적림상응용개치.방법 장아원69례결장암수술병인수궤분성이조,기중응용BAR작장문합33례(BAR조);용전통수공문합36례(TMA조).대량조병인적평균수술화장문합시간、술후병발증,이급장경수방결과 진행비교.결과 량조병인균무사망,균전유출원.BAR조적평균수술화장문합시간균명현소우TMA조;BAR조적술후병발증여문합구출혈、장공능회복시간、폐부감염균명현호우TMA조;BAR조무문합구루,이TMA조칙유2례;3~6개월후적장경수방,결과 현시재문합구궤양、문합구염、문합구육아종등방면BAR조균명현호우TMA조.량조상술다항지표적차이균유통계학의의(P<0.05 혹0.01).결론 응용BAR우결장암수술구유조작간편、쾌첩、료효호급술후병발증소등우점.
Objective To valuate the biodegradable anastomosis ring (BAR) in colon carcinoma operation by means of prospective study.Methods 69 cases of colon carcinoma were randomly divided into two groups.Among them,33 cases underwent intestine anastomosis with BAR in operation (BAR group),and another 36 cases underwent traditional manual anastomosis (TMA group).The operation time for the intestinal anastomosis,the postoperative complication and the result of follow-up colonoscopy from the two groups were compared.Results There was no death in both groups after operation and all cases were cured to discharge from hospital.The operation time for intestinal anastomosis in BAR group was obviously shorter than that in TMA group.The postoperative complications such as anastomotic bleeding and pulmonary infection were obviously less in BAR group than that in TMA group.The period of bowel function recovery was shorter in BAR group than that in TMA group.There was no anastomotic leak in BAR group while two cases in TMA group.The follow-up colonoscopy 3-6 months after operation showed the incidences of anastomotic stenosis,ulcer,inflammation and granuloma were obviously less in BAR group than that in TMA group.All the differences between the two groups mentioned above were statistically significant (P<0.01 or P<0.05).Conclusion s Application of BAR in colon cancer surgery has the advantages of simple,good efficiency and less postoperative complications.