光学精密工程
光學精密工程
광학정밀공정
OPTICS AND PRECISION ENGINEERING
2009年
6期
1228-1232
,共5页
谭晓昀%周贤中%姜一鸣%陈伟平
譚曉昀%週賢中%薑一鳴%陳偉平
담효윤%주현중%강일명%진위평
Sigma Delta调制%脉冲编码调制%微加速度计
Sigma Delta調製%脈遲編碼調製%微加速度計
Sigma Delta조제%맥충편마조제%미가속도계
Sigma Delta modulation%pulse code modulation%micro-accelerometer
对Sigma Delta调制与脉冲编码调制进行对比,研究了Sigma Delta调制与脉冲编码调制的优缺点.建立了微加速度计中两位输出的Sigma Delta调制和两位输出的脉冲编码调制的仿真系统.然后,对比使用这两种调制方式的微加速度计的加速度信号,并分析在两种不同调制方式下的输出信号波形的差别.最后,利用周期图法得到了两种调制信号的功率谱密度图,发现在低频段脉冲编码调制信号的量化噪声比Sigma Delta调制信号大很多;而在高频段,两种调制方式信号的量化噪声一样严重.仿真结果表明,尽管Sigma Delta调制系统比脉冲编码调制系统更加复杂,但是Sigma Delta调制得到的信噪比要比脉冲编码调制得到的信噪比高出20 dB.
對Sigma Delta調製與脈遲編碼調製進行對比,研究瞭Sigma Delta調製與脈遲編碼調製的優缺點.建立瞭微加速度計中兩位輸齣的Sigma Delta調製和兩位輸齣的脈遲編碼調製的倣真繫統.然後,對比使用這兩種調製方式的微加速度計的加速度信號,併分析在兩種不同調製方式下的輸齣信號波形的差彆.最後,利用週期圖法得到瞭兩種調製信號的功率譜密度圖,髮現在低頻段脈遲編碼調製信號的量化譟聲比Sigma Delta調製信號大很多;而在高頻段,兩種調製方式信號的量化譟聲一樣嚴重.倣真結果錶明,儘管Sigma Delta調製繫統比脈遲編碼調製繫統更加複雜,但是Sigma Delta調製得到的信譟比要比脈遲編碼調製得到的信譟比高齣20 dB.
대Sigma Delta조제여맥충편마조제진행대비,연구료Sigma Delta조제여맥충편마조제적우결점.건립료미가속도계중량위수출적Sigma Delta조제화량위수출적맥충편마조제적방진계통.연후,대비사용저량충조제방식적미가속도계적가속도신호,병분석재량충불동조제방식하적수출신호파형적차별.최후,이용주기도법득도료량충조제신호적공솔보밀도도,발현재저빈단맥충편마조제신호적양화조성비Sigma Delta조제신호대흔다;이재고빈단,량충조제방식신호적양화조성일양엄중.방진결과표명,진관Sigma Delta조제계통비맥충편마조제계통경가복잡,단시Sigma Delta조제득도적신조비요비맥충편마조제득도적신조비고출20 dB.
A comparative study of the Sigma Delta Modulation(SDM) and the Pulse Code Modulation(PCM) is presented, and the advantages and the disadvantages of the two kinds of modulation are also obtained. A 2-bit SDM simulated system and a 2-bit (PCM) simulated system for a micro-accelerometer are established in this paper. Then, the accelaration signals pass through the modulations are comparatively analyzed, and the difference of two mudulations output waves is obtained by the comparive analysis. Finally, the power spectral density patterns of two kinds of the modulated signals are computed with a periodogram respectively. The power spectral density from experimental results indicates that the quantization noise of the PCM is more serious than that of the SDM in the low frequency, but the quantization noises of both modulation methods are the same in the high frequency. The simulated results show that the SNR of the SDM is 20 dB higher than that of the PCM, though the SDM modulation system is more complex than the PCM.