中华胸心血管外科杂志
中華胸心血管外科雜誌
중화흉심혈관외과잡지
Chinese Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
2011年
3期
170-172
,共3页
吴强%黄方炯%许尚栋%孙东%杨禁非
吳彊%黃方炯%許尚棟%孫東%楊禁非
오강%황방형%허상동%손동%양금비
心肺转流术%冠状动脉分流术%冠状动脉旁路移植术,非体外循环%移植物闭塞,血管
心肺轉流術%冠狀動脈分流術%冠狀動脈徬路移植術,非體外循環%移植物閉塞,血管
심폐전류술%관상동맥분류술%관상동맥방로이식술,비체외순배%이식물폐새,혈관
Cardiopulmonary bypass%Coronary artery bypass%Coronary artery bypass grafting,off-pump Graft occlusion,vascular
目的 比较非体外循环不停跳与体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植手术后中远期移植血管的通畅率.方法 对同一术者行冠状动脉旁路移植手术后5年以上病例50例.按手术方式分为两组.第1组采用传统体外循环下进行冠状动脉旁路移植(体外循环组,25例);第2组采用非体外循环不停跳技术进行冠状动脉旁路移植(非体外循环组,25例).对所有病例进行冠状动脉造影随访,比较两组移植血管的通畅情况.结果 两组均男21例,女4例.第1组手术年龄(55.4±8.9)岁;随访70~110个月,平均(86.52±12.48)个月;移植血管共83支,其中动脉移植血管41支,静脉移植血管42支,平均移植血管(3.32±0.63)支/例;随访移植血管通畅61支,狭窄6支,闭塞16支,动脉移植物通畅率为78.05%,静脉通畅率69.05%,总通畅率73.49%.第2组手术年龄(58.2±9.09)岁;移植血管共65支,其中动脉移植血管31支,静脉移植血管34支,平均移植血管(2.52±0.71)支/例,随访64~99个月,平均(82.68±12.48)个月;随访移植血管通畅47支,狭窄4支,闭塞14支,动脉移植物通畅率为74.19%,静脉通畅率70.59%,总通畅率72.31%.结论 非体外循环不停跳冠状动脉旁路移植手术移植血管中远期通畅率与传统体外循环手术一致,均可达到较好的中远期疗效.
目的 比較非體外循環不停跳與體外循環冠狀動脈徬路移植手術後中遠期移植血管的通暢率.方法 對同一術者行冠狀動脈徬路移植手術後5年以上病例50例.按手術方式分為兩組.第1組採用傳統體外循環下進行冠狀動脈徬路移植(體外循環組,25例);第2組採用非體外循環不停跳技術進行冠狀動脈徬路移植(非體外循環組,25例).對所有病例進行冠狀動脈造影隨訪,比較兩組移植血管的通暢情況.結果 兩組均男21例,女4例.第1組手術年齡(55.4±8.9)歲;隨訪70~110箇月,平均(86.52±12.48)箇月;移植血管共83支,其中動脈移植血管41支,靜脈移植血管42支,平均移植血管(3.32±0.63)支/例;隨訪移植血管通暢61支,狹窄6支,閉塞16支,動脈移植物通暢率為78.05%,靜脈通暢率69.05%,總通暢率73.49%.第2組手術年齡(58.2±9.09)歲;移植血管共65支,其中動脈移植血管31支,靜脈移植血管34支,平均移植血管(2.52±0.71)支/例,隨訪64~99箇月,平均(82.68±12.48)箇月;隨訪移植血管通暢47支,狹窄4支,閉塞14支,動脈移植物通暢率為74.19%,靜脈通暢率70.59%,總通暢率72.31%.結論 非體外循環不停跳冠狀動脈徬路移植手術移植血管中遠期通暢率與傳統體外循環手術一緻,均可達到較好的中遠期療效.
목적 비교비체외순배불정도여체외순배관상동맥방로이식수술후중원기이식혈관적통창솔.방법 대동일술자행관상동맥방로이식수술후5년이상병례50례.안수술방식분위량조.제1조채용전통체외순배하진행관상동맥방로이식(체외순배조,25례);제2조채용비체외순배불정도기술진행관상동맥방로이식(비체외순배조,25례).대소유병례진행관상동맥조영수방,비교량조이식혈관적통창정황.결과 량조균남21례,녀4례.제1조수술년령(55.4±8.9)세;수방70~110개월,평균(86.52±12.48)개월;이식혈관공83지,기중동맥이식혈관41지,정맥이식혈관42지,평균이식혈관(3.32±0.63)지/례;수방이식혈관통창61지,협착6지,폐새16지,동맥이식물통창솔위78.05%,정맥통창솔69.05%,총통창솔73.49%.제2조수술년령(58.2±9.09)세;이식혈관공65지,기중동맥이식혈관31지,정맥이식혈관34지,평균이식혈관(2.52±0.71)지/례,수방64~99개월,평균(82.68±12.48)개월;수방이식혈관통창47지,협착4지,폐새14지,동맥이식물통창솔위74.19%,정맥통창솔70.59%,총통창솔72.31%.결론 비체외순배불정도관상동맥방로이식수술이식혈관중원기통창솔여전통체외순배수술일치,균가체도교호적중원기료효.
Objective Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) is used more widely in recent years in China. However, there is an argument on benefits and risks of off-pump surgery. Many studies shown that OPCAB had more benefits in short-term outcomes than conventional coronary artery bypass grafting(CCABG). But evidences from other studies suggested that OPCAB resulted in less long-term graft patency as compared with on-pump surgery. This study examined the longterm graft patency of OPCAB and CCABG performed by one surgeon. Methods 50 patients who had received surgical revascularization by a surgeon for more than 5 years were reviewed, 25 patients received conventional coronary artery bypass grafting ( group 1 ) and 25 patients received OPCAB ( group 2). All patients had angiograms for compareing the graft patency between the two groups. Results Among 25 patients in group 1,21 were male and 4 were female. The mean age of patients at surgery was (55.4 ±8.9) years. 15 cases had unstable angina, 16 patients had old myocardial infarction and 6 cases had diabetes.The ejection fraction (EF) was 0.58 ±0.14. The mean number of bypasses per patient was 3.32 ±0.63. Mean duration of operation was (3.58 ± 0. 82) hours. Mean follow-up duration was ( 86.52 ± 12.48) months. 83 grafts were evaluated for patency ( open vs. closed) and were graded by Fitzgibbon as grade A ( excellent graft), B ( impaired graft, with a stenosis of ≥50%, or a diameter less than 50% of the grafted artery), or O ( completely occluded). The graft patency was 73.49%, 61grafts were graded as Fitzgibbon A, 6 grafts as Fitzgibbon B and 16 grafts as Fitzgibbon 0. 25 patients were in group 2, 21males and 4 females. The mean age of patients at procedure was (58.2 ± 9.09) years, 11 patients had unstable angina, 13 patients had old myocardial infarction and 6 cases had diabetes. The ejection fraction (EF) was 0.59 ± 0. 14. Conclusion No 2011.03.013 difference in long-term graft patency was identified between on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Off-pump oronary artery bypass grafting preformed by an experienced surgeon may gain similar long-term graft patency to that of conventional bypass.