CAJ | 학술논문

目的探讨在恐惧情绪条件下,增强情绪调节方式对不同心理素质水平军人自主神经反应的影响.方法利用军人心理素质量表将818名官兵分为高、中、低心理素质组,从中抽取高、中、低心理素质军人各30名作为研究对象.在恐惧情绪诱发下,观察被试采用增强情绪策略(认知重视、表情宣泄)后指端血容振幅值、皮电、高频功率和心律R-R间期标准差四个自主神经反应指标的变化,以及指端血容振幅、皮电的平均恢复时间.结果 (1)静息状态下,不同心理素质水平军人自主神经活动生理指标的变化均不存在显著性差异.(2)采用认知重视时,不同心理素质水平军人皮电降低,低心理素质水平军人[(-0.67±1.05)μΩ]、中心理素质水平军人[(-0.49±0.75)μΩ]和高心理素质水平军人[(-2.16±2.18)μΩ]之间存在显著差异；高心理素质水平军人高频功率[(-2.17±8.96)nU]显著低于简单观看[(6.96±7.08)nU]；采用表情宣泄时,高心理素质水平军人的高频功率[(1.95±6.58)nU]显著低于简单观看[(6.96±7.08)nU].(3)采用认知重视时,低心理素质水平军人指端血容振幅平均恢复时间[(65.50±43.43)s]比高心理素质水平军人[(26.50±25.72)s]长且差异显著；采用表情宣泄时,低心理素质水平军人指端血容振幅平均恢复时间[(71.50±48.36)s]比高心理素质水平军人[(21.00±35.50)s]长且差异显著；低心理素质水平军人皮电的平均恢复时间[(103.50±38.01)s]比中[(63.50±48.59)s]、高心理素质水平军人[ (61.50±33.09)s]长且差异显著.结论低心理素质水平军人使用增强情绪调节虽然可以让交感抑制,但交感神经的调节能力却比高心理素质水平军人差.
목적 탐토재공구정서조건하,증강정서조절방식대불동심리소질수평군인자주신경반응적영향.방법 이용군인심리소질량표장818명관병분위고、중、저심리소질조,종중추취고、중、저심리소질군인각30명작위연구대상.재공구정서유발하,관찰피시채용증강정서책략(인지중시、표정선설)후지단혈용진폭치、피전、고빈공솔화심률R-R간기표준차사개자주신경반응지표적변화,이급지단혈용진폭、피전적평균회복시간.결과 (1)정식상태하,불동심리소질수평군인자주신경활동생리지표적변화균불존재현저성차이.(2)채용인지중시시,불동심리소질수평군인피전강저,저심리소질수평군인[(-0.67±1.05)μΩ]、중심리소질수평군인[(-0.49±0.75)μΩ]화고심리소질수평군인[(-2.16±2.18)μΩ]지간존재현저차이；고심리소질수평군인고빈공솔[(-2.17±8.96)nU]현저저우간단관간[(6.96±7.08)nU]；채용표정선설시,고심리소질수평군인적고빈공솔[(1.95±6.58)nU]현저저우간단관간[(6.96±7.08)nU].(3)채용인지중시시,저심리소질수평군인지단혈용진폭평균회복시간[(65.50±43.43)s]비고심리소질수평군인[(26.50±25.72)s]장차차이현저；채용표정선설시,저심리소질수평군인지단혈용진폭평균회복시간[(71.50±48.36)s]비고심리소질수평군인[(21.00±35.50)s]장차차이현저；저심리소질수평군인피전적평균회복시간[(103.50±38.01)s]비중[(63.50±48.59)s]、고심리소질수평군인[ (61.50±33.09)s]장차차이현저.결론 저심리소질수평군인사용증강정서조절수연가이양교감억제,단교감신경적조절능력각비고심리소질수평군인차.
Objective To investigate the characteristics of autonomic nervous response of armymen with different mental quality use the enhanced emotion regulation strategies during fear emotion processes.Methods Mental Quality Questionnaire of Armymen was used to select participants from 818 armymen,screening out 30 armymen with low mental quality,30 armymen with moderate and 30 armymen with high.With elicitation of fear emotion,the participants adopted enhance emotion regulation strategies (cognition emphasis and emotion catharsis),and their blood volume pulse( BVP),skin conductance( SC ),normalized high frequency spectral component(HFnorm),standard deviation of all normal intervals(SDNN) and the recovery time of BVP and SC were recorded.Results ( 1 ) The different mental quality of army men activity in the autonomic physiological changes were not significant differences in resting state.(2) When using the cognition emphasis,the SC of different mental quality of armymen were reduced,and low mental quality of armymen( ( -0.67 ± 1.05 )μ.Ω),moderate mental quality of armymen ( ( - 0.49 ± 0.75 ) μΩ) had larger SC than high mental quality of armymen ( ( - 2.16 ± 2.18 ) μΩ ) ;high mental quality of armymen( ( - 2.17 ± 8.96) nU ) had lower HFnorm than the control( ( 6.96 ± 7.08 ) nU ).When using emotion catharsis,high mental quality of armymen ( ( 1.95 ± 6.58 ) nU ) had lower HFnorm than the control( (6.96 ±7.08)nU).(3)When using the cognition emphasis,low mental quality of armymen ((65.50 ±43.43 )s) had longer recovery time of BVP than high mental quality of armymen( (26.50 ± 25.72)s).When using emotion catharsis,low mental quality of armymen( (71.50 ± 48.36)mm Hg)had longer recovery time of BVP than high mental quality of armymen ( ( 21.00 ± 35.50 ) mm Hg) ; low mental quality of armymen ( ( 103.50 ± 38.01 ) s)had longer SC than moderate( (63.50 ±48.59)s) and high mental quality of armymen( (61.50 ±33.09) s).Conclusion The ability to regulate sympathetic in low mental quality group is weaker than the high mental quality group,although sympathetic can be suppressed when enhanced emotion regulation are adopted.