CAJ | 학술논문

目的探讨分析机动车肇事驾驶员的人格特征,为驾驶员选拔或个性化培训提供参考.方法采用卡特尔16种人格因素量表(16PF)对226名机动车肇事驾驶员(研究组)进行人格问卷调查,并与187名机动车非肇事驾驶员(对照组)进行对照分析.采用SPSS12.0统计分析软件进行t检验.结果 (1)16PF各得分中,在乐群性、稳定性、恃强性、兴奋性、敢为性5个方面研究组[(11.27±3.74)分,(14.74±2.73)分,(11.94±3.77)分,(12.53±4.94)分,(10.94±3.43)分]均低于对照组[(12.81±3.08)分,(16.76±2.84)分,(14.27±3.67)分,(15.44±3.56)分,(11.91±3.22)分],差异有显著性(t=3.08,2.83,4.87,5.12和2.22,P＜0.05～0.01),在怀疑性、忧虑性、独立性方面研究组明显高于对照组,差异有显著性(t=2.87,2.52和2.03,P＜0.05～0.01);(2)次级人格比较,内外向型和怯弱果断2个方面研究组明显低于对照组,差异有显著性(t=4.93,2.09,P＜0.05～0.01).结论肇事组驾驶员存在明显的人格问题,其人格问题与机动车肇事有着直接的关系.应根据其人格特点采取相应的干预措施.
목적 탐토분석궤동차조사가사원적인격특정,위가사원선발혹개성화배훈제공삼고.방법 채용잡특이16충인격인소량표(16PF)대226명궤동차조사가사원(연구조)진행인격문권조사,병여187명궤동차비조사가사원(대조조)진행대조분석.채용SPSS12.0통계분석연건진행t검험.결과 (1)16PF각득분중,재악군성、은정성、시강성、흥강성、감위성5개방면연구조[(11.27±3.74)분,(14.74±2.73)분,(11.94±3.77)분,(12.53±4.94)분,(10.94±3.43)분]균저우대조조[(12.81±3.08)분,(16.76±2.84)분,(14.27±3.67)분,(15.44±3.56)분,(11.91±3.22)분],차이유현저성(t=3.08,2.83,4.87,5.12화2.22,P＜0.05～0.01),재부의성、우필성、독립성방면연구조명현고우대조조,차이유현저성(t=2.87,2.52화2.03,P＜0.05～0.01);(2)차급인격비교,내외향형화겁약과단2개방면연구조명현저우대조조,차이유현저성(t=4.93,2.09,P＜0.05～0.01).결론 조사조가사원존재명현적인격문제,기인격문제여궤동차조사유착직접적관계.응근거기인격특점채취상응적간예조시.
ObjectiveTo explore the personality characteristics of motor trouble-makers to provide reference for drivers' selection and individuation training. MethodsPersonality questionnaires were conducted with 16 Personality Factor Questionnaire(16PF) in 226 motor trouble-makers(research group) and compared with 187 drivers without trouble-making (control group). Results(1) Such factors' scores as A,G, E, F and H were all lower in the research (11.27±3.74,14.74±2.73,11.94±3.77,12.53±4.94 and 10.94±3.43 )than in the control group (12.81±3.08,16.76±2.84,14.27±3.67,15.44±3.56 and 11.91±3.22), which showed significant differences(t=3.08,2.83,4.87,5.12 and 2.22,P＜0.05～0.001).Those as L, O, Q2 were significantly higher in the research than in the control group, which showed significant differences(t=2.87,2.52 and 2.03,P＜ 0.05～0.01).(2) There were significant differences in introversion and extroversion as well as cowardice and decision between the research and control group, which showed significant differences(t=4.93,2.09,P＜0.05～0.01). Conclusion Motor trouble-makers have apparent personality problems and their personality problems are directly related to motor trouble-making. Relative interventions are conducted according to their personality characteristics.