CAJ | 학술논문

为促进水资源的优化配置,提高水资源的利用效率和效益,水权转让成为了重要途径。本文对目前国内外出现的主要定价方法（包括成本法、影子价格法、博弈定价法和实物期权法等）进行了理论性分析和实用性比较,并针对性地比较了国内外水权转让的实际案例。研究认为：以成本法为基础兼吸取其他定价方法的有益成分是促进水权转让定价方法尽快走向实用和成熟的有效途径。
위촉진수자원적우화배치,제고수자원적이용효솔화효익,수권전양성위료중요도경。본문대목전국내외출현적주요정개방법（포괄성본법、영자개격법、박혁정개법화실물기권법등）진행료이론성분석화실용성비교,병침대성지비교료국내외수권전양적실제안례。연구인위：이성본법위기출겸흡취기타정개방법적유익성분시촉진수권전양정개방법진쾌주향실용화성숙적유효도경。
Under the condition of socialist market economy,water rights transfer is an important way to improve the optimal allocation and use efficiency and benefits of water resources.Its pricing is a basic work of establishing water market and promoting water rights transfer.In this study,the existing pricing methods, including cost method,shadow price method,pricing-game method and real option method,were analyzed theoretically and compared practically.Combined with the analysis of existing real transfer cases at home and abroad,the opinion was formed that the best way of making the pricing method more practical and mature is to absorb the beneficial parts from other pricing methods on the basis of cost method.It will provide a theoretical guidance for the pricing method study of water rights transfer.