中国临床康复
中國臨床康複
중국림상강복
CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL REHABILITATION
2006年
6期
156-158
,共3页
白质软化病,脑室周围%痴呆,血管性%认知障碍
白質軟化病,腦室週圍%癡呆,血管性%認知障礙
백질연화병,뇌실주위%치태,혈관성%인지장애
背景:单纯脑白质疏松症和皮质下动脉硬化性脑病的认知功能是脑血管病神经心理研究的一部分,但目前关于两者的对比研究还是空白.目的:探讨单纯脑白质疏松症、皮质下动脉硬化性脑病及单纯脑白质疏松症合并脑梗死认知功能的不同特点.设计:随机对照观察.单位:山东大学齐鲁医院神经内科.对象:选择1997-03/2000-05在山东大学齐鲁医院神经内科就诊的脑血管病患者91例,均自愿参加观察.按疾病类型分为3组,其中单纯脑白质疏松症组27例,皮质下动脉硬化性脑病组33例,单纯脑白质疏松症+脑梗死组31例.另外选择健康对照组30例.以上各组观察对象均自愿参加观察.方法:对各组观察对象进行认知功能及记忆能力评定,并进行对比分析.认知功能测定采用简易精神状态量表,按不同文化程度(文盲、小学、中学、大学)评分分别低于17,20,22,23分为痴呆.记忆能力测查采用中国医学科学院心理研究所等编制的临床记忆量表甲式,测查内容包括联想学习、指向记忆、无意义图形再认、图像自由回忆和人像特点联系回忆,将上述5项测查成绩换算成量表分并算出记忆商.主要观察指标:各组观察对象认知功能障碍情况及简易精神状态量表、临床记忆量表评分..结果:纳入脑血管病患者91例及健康对照者30例,全部进入结果分析,无脱落.①各组观察对象认知功能障碍情况比较:单纯脑白质疏松症组轻度认知功能障碍21例(77.8%);皮质下动脉硬化性脑病组中度认知功能障碍8例(24.2%),痴呆25例(75.8%);单纯脑白质疏松症+脑梗死组中度认知功能障碍6例(19.4%),痴呆24例(77.4%).②各组观察对象简易精神状态量表及临床记忆量表评分比较:单纯脑白质疏松症组、皮质下动脉硬化性脑病组、单纯脑白质疏松症+脑梗死组两量表评分均显著低于健康对照组(t=2.14~3.81,P<0.05~0.01).皮质下动脉硬化性脑病组和单纯脑白质疏松症+脑梗死组评分显著低于单纯脑白质疏松症组(t=2.13~3.37,P<0.05~0.01).结论:①单纯脑白质疏松症认知损害以轻度认知功能障碍为主.②皮质下动脉硬化性脑病和单纯脑白质疏松症+脑梗死的认知障碍以中度认知功能障碍和痴呆为主,其程度明显重于轻度认知功能障碍.认知功能可以作为评估单纯脑白质疏松症和皮质下动脉硬化性脑病的参考指标.
揹景:單純腦白質疏鬆癥和皮質下動脈硬化性腦病的認知功能是腦血管病神經心理研究的一部分,但目前關于兩者的對比研究還是空白.目的:探討單純腦白質疏鬆癥、皮質下動脈硬化性腦病及單純腦白質疏鬆癥閤併腦梗死認知功能的不同特點.設計:隨機對照觀察.單位:山東大學齊魯醫院神經內科.對象:選擇1997-03/2000-05在山東大學齊魯醫院神經內科就診的腦血管病患者91例,均自願參加觀察.按疾病類型分為3組,其中單純腦白質疏鬆癥組27例,皮質下動脈硬化性腦病組33例,單純腦白質疏鬆癥+腦梗死組31例.另外選擇健康對照組30例.以上各組觀察對象均自願參加觀察.方法:對各組觀察對象進行認知功能及記憶能力評定,併進行對比分析.認知功能測定採用簡易精神狀態量錶,按不同文化程度(文盲、小學、中學、大學)評分分彆低于17,20,22,23分為癡呆.記憶能力測查採用中國醫學科學院心理研究所等編製的臨床記憶量錶甲式,測查內容包括聯想學習、指嚮記憶、無意義圖形再認、圖像自由迴憶和人像特點聯繫迴憶,將上述5項測查成績換算成量錶分併算齣記憶商.主要觀察指標:各組觀察對象認知功能障礙情況及簡易精神狀態量錶、臨床記憶量錶評分..結果:納入腦血管病患者91例及健康對照者30例,全部進入結果分析,無脫落.①各組觀察對象認知功能障礙情況比較:單純腦白質疏鬆癥組輕度認知功能障礙21例(77.8%);皮質下動脈硬化性腦病組中度認知功能障礙8例(24.2%),癡呆25例(75.8%);單純腦白質疏鬆癥+腦梗死組中度認知功能障礙6例(19.4%),癡呆24例(77.4%).②各組觀察對象簡易精神狀態量錶及臨床記憶量錶評分比較:單純腦白質疏鬆癥組、皮質下動脈硬化性腦病組、單純腦白質疏鬆癥+腦梗死組兩量錶評分均顯著低于健康對照組(t=2.14~3.81,P<0.05~0.01).皮質下動脈硬化性腦病組和單純腦白質疏鬆癥+腦梗死組評分顯著低于單純腦白質疏鬆癥組(t=2.13~3.37,P<0.05~0.01).結論:①單純腦白質疏鬆癥認知損害以輕度認知功能障礙為主.②皮質下動脈硬化性腦病和單純腦白質疏鬆癥+腦梗死的認知障礙以中度認知功能障礙和癡呆為主,其程度明顯重于輕度認知功能障礙.認知功能可以作為評估單純腦白質疏鬆癥和皮質下動脈硬化性腦病的參攷指標.
배경:단순뇌백질소송증화피질하동맥경화성뇌병적인지공능시뇌혈관병신경심리연구적일부분,단목전관우량자적대비연구환시공백.목적:탐토단순뇌백질소송증、피질하동맥경화성뇌병급단순뇌백질소송증합병뇌경사인지공능적불동특점.설계:수궤대조관찰.단위:산동대학제로의원신경내과.대상:선택1997-03/2000-05재산동대학제로의원신경내과취진적뇌혈관병환자91례,균자원삼가관찰.안질병류형분위3조,기중단순뇌백질소송증조27례,피질하동맥경화성뇌병조33례,단순뇌백질소송증+뇌경사조31례.령외선택건강대조조30례.이상각조관찰대상균자원삼가관찰.방법:대각조관찰대상진행인지공능급기억능력평정,병진행대비분석.인지공능측정채용간역정신상태량표,안불동문화정도(문맹、소학、중학、대학)평분분별저우17,20,22,23분위치태.기억능력측사채용중국의학과학원심리연구소등편제적림상기억량표갑식,측사내용포괄련상학습、지향기억、무의의도형재인、도상자유회억화인상특점련계회억,장상술5항측사성적환산성량표분병산출기억상.주요관찰지표:각조관찰대상인지공능장애정황급간역정신상태량표、림상기억량표평분..결과:납입뇌혈관병환자91례급건강대조자30례,전부진입결과분석,무탈락.①각조관찰대상인지공능장애정황비교:단순뇌백질소송증조경도인지공능장애21례(77.8%);피질하동맥경화성뇌병조중도인지공능장애8례(24.2%),치태25례(75.8%);단순뇌백질소송증+뇌경사조중도인지공능장애6례(19.4%),치태24례(77.4%).②각조관찰대상간역정신상태량표급림상기억량표평분비교:단순뇌백질소송증조、피질하동맥경화성뇌병조、단순뇌백질소송증+뇌경사조량량표평분균현저저우건강대조조(t=2.14~3.81,P<0.05~0.01).피질하동맥경화성뇌병조화단순뇌백질소송증+뇌경사조평분현저저우단순뇌백질소송증조(t=2.13~3.37,P<0.05~0.01).결론:①단순뇌백질소송증인지손해이경도인지공능장애위주.②피질하동맥경화성뇌병화단순뇌백질소송증+뇌경사적인지장애이중도인지공능장애화치태위주,기정도명현중우경도인지공능장애.인지공능가이작위평고단순뇌백질소송증화피질하동맥경화성뇌병적삼고지표.
BACKGROUND: Cognitive function of simple leukoaraeosis (LA) and subcortical arterioselerotic encephalopathy (SAE) is a part of research in cerebrovascular neuropsychology, however, there is no contrast study on cognitive function between the two diseases. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the different features in cognitive function among patients with simple leukoaraeosis, subcortical arterioselerotic encephalopathy and simple leukoaraeosis combined with cerebral infarction. DESIGN: Randomized controlled observation SETTING: Department of Neurological Medicine, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 91 cases of patients with cerebrovascular disease diagnosed in Department of Neurological Medicine of Qilu Hospital of Shandong University from March 1997 to May 2000 were selected. All the patients participated in the observation voluntarily. They were divided into 3 groups according to the type of disease, with 27 cases in simple leukoaraeosis group, 33 cases in subcortical arterioselerotic encephalopathy group and 31 cases in simple leukoaraeosis + cerebral infarction group.Additionally, 30 healthy cases were selected as control group. All the subjects in the above groups participated in the observation voluntarily. METHODS: Assessment on cognitive function and memory ability was conducted on the subjects in each group, and contrast analysis was performed. Mini-mental state examination was used for detecting cognitive function. Patients whose score was less than 17, 20, 22, 23 respectively according to different educational degree (illiteracy, primary school, middle school, university), would be diagnosed as dementia. Clinical me mory scale A edited by Psychology Institute of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences was used for detecting memory ability including associative learning, directive memory, recognition of nonsense figure, image free recall and portrait characteristics associative recall. Conversed the above 5 items of detecting results to scores of scales and calculated out the memory quotients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: State of cognitive disorder and scores of mini-mental state examination and clinical memory scale of subjects in each group. RESULTS: All the 91 cases of patients with cerebrovascular disease and 30 healthy control cases entered results analysis without any drop out. ① Comparison of the state of cognitive disorder among subjects in each group: There were 21 cases of mild cognitive disorder (77.8%) in simple leukoaraeosis group, 8 cases of moderate cognitive disorder (24.2%) and 25 cases of dementia (75.8%) in subcortical arterioselerotic encephalopathy group, 6 cases of moderate cognitive disorder (19.4%) and 24 cases of dementia (77.4%) in simple leukoaraeosis + cerebral infarction group. ② Comparison of the scores of mini-mental state examination among and clinical memory scale: Scores of the two scales in simple leukoaraeosis group, subcortical arterioselerotic encephalopathy group and simple leukoaraeosis + cerebral infarction group were significantly lower than those in healthy control group (t=2.14-3.81, P < 0.05-0.01). The scores in subcortical arterioselerotic encephalopathy group and simple leukoaraeosis+ cerebral infarction group were significantly lower than those in simple leukoaraeosis group (t=2.13-3.37, P < 0.05-0.01).CONCLUSION: ① The cognitive impairment in simple leukoaraeosis is mainly mild cognitive disorder. ② The cognitive impairments in subcortical arterioselerotic encephalopathy and simple leukoaraeosis + cerebral infarction are mainly moderate cognitive disorder and dementia which are obviously severer than mild cognitive disorder. Cognitive function can be used as reference indicator for assessing simple leukoaraeosis and subcortical arterioselerotic encephalopathy.Liang LP, He Y, Guo HZ.A contrast between the cognitive function of patients with simple leukoaraeosis and subcortical arterioselerotic encephalopathy.