CAJ | 학술논문

目的探讨限定刑事责任能力评定量表在责任能力评定中的扩展运用价值.方法采用DCRRS(内容包括现实作案动机,先兆,诱因,时间、地点、对象、工具选择,作案时情绪反应,作案后各种行为表现,生活自理能力、工作学习能力、自知力、现实检验能力损害和自我控制能力等)对108例符合要求的患者进行评定并与专家鉴定结果进行比较.结果 DCRRS各条目间及其与总量表分间的相关均具有统计学意义(r=0.145～0.944,P<0.001),分半信度为0.868.根据DCRRS参考划界分分组,无、限定和完全责任能力3组间及两两间量表总分均具有显著统计学差异(P<0.001).DCRRS与专家鉴定结果一致性较高(Kappa=0.958,P<0.001),经判别方程回代具有较高的正确率(97.2%).结论 DCRRS的信效度良好,可作为辅助参考使用.
목적 탐토한정형사책임능력평정량표재책임능력평정중적확전운용개치.방법 채용DCRRS(내용포괄현실작안동궤,선조,유인,시간、지점、대상、공구선택,작안시정서반응,작안후각충행위표현,생활자리능력、공작학습능력、자지력、현실검험능력손해화자아공제능력등)대108례부합요구적환자진행평정병여전가감정결과 진행비교.결과 DCRRS각조목간급기여총량표분간적상관균구유통계학의의(r=0.145～0.944,P<0.001),분반신도위0.868.근거DCRRS삼고화계분분조,무、한정화완전책임능력3조간급량량간량표총분균구유현저통계학차이(P<0.001).DCRRS여전가감정결과일치성교고(Kappa=0.958,P<0.001),경판별방정회대구유교고적정학솔(97.2%).결론 DCRRS적신효도량호,가작위보조삼고사용.
Objective To explore the applicability of extended usage of the diminished criminal responsi-bility rating scale(DCRRS) to criminal responsibility assessment. Methods 108 patients were evaluated with DCRRS( containing items such as criminal motive, foreboding, induction factor, choice of time, choice of place, choice of object, choice of tool, emotional response in the act, behavioral expression after the act, activities of daily life, learning and working capacity, insight, insult of perceptibility of fact, insult of self-controlling capability),which was compared with the expert opinion. Results The correlation of DCRRS be-tween each item and between each item and the total score was statistically significant( r =0. 145 ～ 0. 944, P<0. 001 ), and the split half reliability was 0. 868. When the cases were graded into three groups(non, di-minished and full responsibility group) based to cut-off score of DCRRS, the scores revealed statistically sig-nificant among the three groups and within groups (P < 0. 001 ). DCRRS had a high consistency with the ex-pert opinions on the grade of criminal responsibility (Kappa =0. 958, P <0. 001 ). Classification results sug-gested that there was a higher correct rate as evaluated discriminant function (97.2%). Conclusion DCRRS reveals good reliability and validity, which can be used as a reference for the assessment.