CAJ | 학술논문

目的了解佛山市顺德区不同人群对艾滋病相关知识知晓率现状及态度,评价对不同人群进行健康干预的效果,为今后制定和调整艾滋病防控策略提供科学依据.方法采用整群抽样的方法,分别在社区、厂企、学校、强制戒毒所和娱乐场所,抽取部分人群进行艾滋病防治知识及对艾滋病病毒感染者态度等内容的基线调查,随后通过发放宣传资料、集中上课、观看宣传短片、知识抢答等方式进行健康干预,干预后使用相同的问卷再次进行相关知识知晓率的调查.结果参与基线调查并交回有效问卷2792人,65.5%的人认为艾滋病很可怕;41.9%的人认为艾滋病感染者不应该正常工作35.10%的人因怕感染而不愿与艾滋病感染者握手或就餐;37.6%的人不知道在有关医疗机构可进行自愿免费检测;艾滋病知识知晓率为75.4%～83.9%.参与干预并接受再次调查的共2603人,艾滋病知识知晓率提高至86.7%～97.4%,与基线调查结果差异有显著性(x2=131.60,P<0.001).结论不同人群通过干预都能收到明显的效果,应加强宣传教育工作,采取合理的综合防控措施,提高人群对艾滋病相关的知信行水平.
목적 료해불산시순덕구불동인군대애자병상관지식지효솔현상급태도,평개대불동인군진행건강간예적효과,위금후제정화조정애자병방공책략제공과학의거.방법 채용정군추양적방법,분별재사구、엄기、학교、강제계독소화오악장소,추취부분인군진행애자병방치지식급대애자병병독감염자태도등내용적기선조사,수후통과발방선전자료、집중상과、관간선전단편、지식창답등방식진행건강간예,간예후사용상동적문권재차진행상관지식지효솔적조사.결과 삼여기선조사병교회유효문권2792인,65.5%적인인위애자병흔가파;41.9%적인인위애자병감염자불응해정상공작35.10%적인인파감염이불원여애자병감염자악수혹취찬;37.6%적인불지도재유관의료궤구가진행자원면비검측;애자병지식지효솔위75.4%～83.9%.삼여간예병접수재차조사적공2603인,애자병지식지효솔제고지86.7%～97.4%,여기선조사결과차이유현저성(x2=131.60,P<0.001).결론불동인군통과간예도능수도명현적효과,응가강선전교육공작,채취합리적종합방공조시,제고인군대애자병상관적지신행수평.
Objective To investigate the awareness of and attitude toward AIDS in different populations in Shunde and evaluate the health intervention on those people, and to provide scientific support for preventing and controlling AIDS in the future. Methods Samples of population were selected from the communities, factories, schools, compulsory rehabilitation centers, and recreation facilities in Shunde with cluster sampling to conduct a baseline questionnaire survey on the awareness of AIDS and attitude toward AIDS patients. Then AIDS-associated health intervention including pamphlets, lectures, short movies, knowledge contests were performed. The same questionnaire survey was then conducted to collect information about HIV/AIDS-related knowledge and attitude after the intervention. Results A total of 2793 subjects were interviewed. 65.5 % of them considered AIDS was terrible, 41.9% thought that individuals with AIDS infection shouldn't work normally, 35.10% were reluctant to shake hands or have dinner with HIV-positive individuals, 37.6% had no idea that they could receive a free examination for HIV/AIDS at certain medical facilites. The awareness rate of AIDS was 75.4% to 83.9%. After intervention, 2603 subjects were re surveyed and the awareness rate elevated to 86.7% - 97.4% and differed significantly (x2 = 131.60, .P<0.001). Conclusions The health intervention has a marked effect on different populations. We should strengthen health education to improve the awareness of AIDS.