CAJ | 학술논문

目的比较非品硒平板探测器DR与CR对模拟肺部病变的描述,并对剂量降低情况进行评价.方法模拟线状、网状和结节病变结构置人仿真胸部体模内,应用DR和CR分别对不同mAs设置的体模曝光,记录体模的入射体表剂量.收集不同剂量的硬拷贝照片,由4位放射医师随机地实施模拟肺部病变显示度评价.采用秩和(Wilcoxon)检验进行统计学分析.结果用2.0、3.2 mAs曝光时,DR与CR对模拟线状、网状病变的显示度差异有统计学意义(模拟线状病变:Z=-2.032.P=0.042;Z=-2.375,P=0.018.模拟网状病变:Z=-2.680,P=0.007;Z=-2.670,P=0.008).用5.0、6.3 mAs曝光时,两者对模拟线状、网状病变的显示度差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).2.0、3.2、5.0、6.3 mAs曝光档,对于小结节(直径小于10 mm)的检测DR均优于CR(Z:-2.237,P=0.018;Z=-2.384,P=0.017;Z=-2.388,P=0.017;Z=-2.366,P=0.018).当3种模拟肺部病变都显示清楚时.用非晶硒DR系统的入射体表剂量降低约65%.结论对微小低对比病变的描述,非晶硒平板探测器DR优于CR且明显地降低曝光剂晕.
목적 비교비품서평판탐측기DR여CR대모의폐부병변적묘술,병대제량강저정황진행평개.방법 모의선상、망상화결절병변결구치인방진흉부체모내,응용DR화CR분별대불동mAs설치적체모폭광,기록체모적입사체표제량.수집불동제량적경고패조편,유4위방사의사수궤지실시모의폐부병변현시도평개.채용질화(Wilcoxon)검험진행통계학분석.결과 용2.0、3.2 mAs폭광시,DR여CR대모의선상、망상병변적현시도차이유통계학의의(모의선상병변:Z=-2.032.P=0.042;Z=-2.375,P=0.018.모의망상병변:Z=-2.680,P=0.007;Z=-2.670,P=0.008).용5.0、6.3 mAs폭광시,량자대모의선상、망상병변적현시도차이무통계학의의(P>0.05).2.0、3.2、5.0、6.3 mAs폭광당,대우소결절(직경소우10 mm)적검측DR균우우CR(Z:-2.237,P=0.018;Z=-2.384,P=0.017;Z=-2.388,P=0.017;Z=-2.366,P=0.018).당3충모의폐부병변도현시청초시.용비정서DR계통적입사체표제량강저약65%.결론 대미소저대비병변적묘술,비정서평판탐측기DR우우CR차명현지강저폭광제훈.
Objective To compare an amorphous selenium fiat-panel detector digital radiography(DR) with a computed radiography(CR) for the depiction of simulated pulmonary lesion,as well as for evaluation of dose reduction.Methods Simulated linear,reticular,and nodular lesion were located in all anthropomorphic chest phantom.The phantom was exposed by DR and CR with different mAs sets.The entrance surface doses were recorded for all images.Hard copy images were generated at different dose levels.Images were presented in a random order to four independent radiologists.They subjectively rated the visibility of simulated pulmonary lesion. Statistical significance of difference was analvsed with wilcoxon test.Resuits The visibility of simulated linear and reticular lesions on the images obtained with DR was superior to the images from CR at 2.0 and 3.2 mAs.P <0.05(Simulated linear lesion:Z=-2.032,P=0.042;Z=-2.375,P=0.018.Simulated reticular lesion:Z=-2.680,P=0.007;Z=-2.670,P=0.008).However,there wag no statistically significant difference between DR and CR at 5.0 and 6.3 mAs(P>0.05).DR was superior to CR in detection sinail nodular(diameter<10 mm)lesions at different dose level(mAs:2.0,3.2,5.0,6.3),P<0.05(Z=-2.237, P=0.018;Z=-2.384,P=0.017;Z=-2.388,P=0.017;Z=-2.366,P=0.018).When the visibility of simulated pulmonary lesion for DR and CR were equal,The radiation dose was reduce approximately 65% with the DR.Conclusious DR was superior to CR in depiction of tiny lesion and dose reduction greatly.