现代口腔医学杂志
現代口腔醫學雜誌
현대구강의학잡지
JOURNAL OF MODERN STOMATOLOGY
2009年
6期
580-583
,共4页
冯超%赵晶%轩晶%田慧颖
馮超%趙晶%軒晶%田慧穎
풍초%조정%헌정%전혜영
前磨牙%塑化治疗%显微超声技术%根管再治疗
前磨牙%塑化治療%顯微超聲技術%根管再治療
전마아%소화치료%현미초성기술%근관재치료
Premolar%Microscope and ultrasonic technique%Resinifying therapy%Root canal retreatment
目的 探讨显微超声技术在塑化治疗后根管再治疗的临床应用.方法 选取临床上已行根管塑化治疗但因各种原因需要进行根管再治疗的患者168例,前磨牙187颗(239个根管),分成两组,分别运用常规手动K锉和显微超声技术去除根管内的塑化物后进行根管预备和充填,并记录根管再治疗的疗效和根管充填的效果.结果 166个根管(69.45%)疏通获得成功,其中运用显微超声技术对上颌前磨牙根管再通畅成功率为83.82%,常规方法的下颌前磨牙的再通畅率为60.00%.统计结果显示这两种方法有着显著性差异.结论 塑化治疗后的根管再治疗中运用显微超声技术能够取得比较好的临床效果.
目的 探討顯微超聲技術在塑化治療後根管再治療的臨床應用.方法 選取臨床上已行根管塑化治療但因各種原因需要進行根管再治療的患者168例,前磨牙187顆(239箇根管),分成兩組,分彆運用常規手動K銼和顯微超聲技術去除根管內的塑化物後進行根管預備和充填,併記錄根管再治療的療效和根管充填的效果.結果 166箇根管(69.45%)疏通穫得成功,其中運用顯微超聲技術對上頜前磨牙根管再通暢成功率為83.82%,常規方法的下頜前磨牙的再通暢率為60.00%.統計結果顯示這兩種方法有著顯著性差異.結論 塑化治療後的根管再治療中運用顯微超聲技術能夠取得比較好的臨床效果.
목적 탐토현미초성기술재소화치료후근관재치료적림상응용.방법 선취림상상이행근관소화치료단인각충원인수요진행근관재치료적환자168례,전마아187과(239개근관),분성량조,분별운용상규수동K촤화현미초성기술거제근관내적소화물후진행근관예비화충전,병기록근관재치료적료효화근관충전적효과.결과 166개근관(69.45%)소통획득성공,기중운용현미초성기술대상합전마아근관재통창성공솔위83.82%,상규방법적하합전마아적재통창솔위60.00%.통계결과현시저량충방법유착현저성차이.결론 소화치료후적근관재치료중운용현미초성기술능구취득비교호적림상효과.
Objective To explore the role of microscope and ultrasonic technique in root canal retreatment of resinified teeth.Methods A total of 168 patients with 187 premolar teeth (239 root canals) treated by resinifying therapy were selected for root canal retreatment. The teeth were divided into two groups: one group with hand K files and the other with dental microscope and ultrasonic technique to remove the resinfying materials in the root canals. All the root canals were shaped by Ni-Ti rotary instruments ProTaper, and obturated with vertical compaction technique. The efficiency of preparation and obturation was evaluated with radiographs taken before, during and after operation.Results Totally 166 root canals (69.45%) were negotiated and treated well. Among them, 83.82% of the maxillary premolars removed resinfying materials with dental microscope and ultrasonic technique was successful, while only 60.00% of the mandibular premolars with hand K files was successful. Statitical results showed a difference between the two methods.Conclusion The use of dental microscope and ultrasonic technique can improve root canal retreatment of resinified teeth.