水生生物学报
水生生物學報
수생생물학보
ACTA HYDROBIOLOGICA SINICA
2009年
3期
539-545
,共7页
程飞%谢松光%叶卫%叶富良
程飛%謝鬆光%葉衛%葉富良
정비%사송광%협위%협부량
长臀(鮠)%AFLP%遗传多样性
長臀(鮠)%AFLP%遺傳多樣性
장둔(외)%AFLP%유전다양성
Cranoglanis bouderius%AFLP%Genetic diversity
采用AFLP分子标记技术对珠江长臀(鮠)和海南长臀(鮠)共60个个体(每个群体30个)进行了遗传多样性研究.选取的18对引物组合均能扩增出清晰、可重复的扩增产物,扩增带型差异明显.两个群体均表现出较高的多态位点比例和特异性条带数.群体内个体间的遗传相似度(平均值)珠江长臀(鮠)种群为0.9462±0.0237,海南长臀(鮠)为0.9465±0.0226,海南长臀(鮠)比珠江长臀(鮠)略高.群体间的遗传相似度是0.9367±0.0231,小于两个群体内的遗传相似度,两群体的遗传距离是0.0634±0.0230.根据遗传相似度绘制了UPGMA聚类图.研究结果表明:珠江长臀(鮠)和海南长臀(鮠)间的遗传差异属于种内差异,两者同属一个有效种.
採用AFLP分子標記技術對珠江長臀(鮠)和海南長臀(鮠)共60箇箇體(每箇群體30箇)進行瞭遺傳多樣性研究.選取的18對引物組閤均能擴增齣清晰、可重複的擴增產物,擴增帶型差異明顯.兩箇群體均錶現齣較高的多態位點比例和特異性條帶數.群體內箇體間的遺傳相似度(平均值)珠江長臀(鮠)種群為0.9462±0.0237,海南長臀(鮠)為0.9465±0.0226,海南長臀(鮠)比珠江長臀(鮠)略高.群體間的遺傳相似度是0.9367±0.0231,小于兩箇群體內的遺傳相似度,兩群體的遺傳距離是0.0634±0.0230.根據遺傳相似度繪製瞭UPGMA聚類圖.研究結果錶明:珠江長臀(鮠)和海南長臀(鮠)間的遺傳差異屬于種內差異,兩者同屬一箇有效種.
채용AFLP분자표기기술대주강장둔(외)화해남장둔(외)공60개개체(매개군체30개)진행료유전다양성연구.선취적18대인물조합균능확증출청석、가중복적확증산물,확증대형차이명현.량개군체균표현출교고적다태위점비례화특이성조대수.군체내개체간적유전상사도(평균치)주강장둔(외)충군위0.9462±0.0237,해남장둔(외)위0.9465±0.0226,해남장둔(외)비주강장둔(외)략고.군체간적유전상사도시0.9367±0.0231,소우량개군체내적유전상사도,량군체적유전거리시0.0634±0.0230.근거유전상사도회제료UPGMA취류도.연구결과표명:주강장둔(외)화해남장둔(외)간적유전차이속우충내차이,량자동속일개유효충.
The genus Cranoglanis is a group of fish only distributed in East Asia. They live in the drainages of Guangdong, Guangxi,Yunnan and Haiuan Province, China, and the Red River drainage in northern Vietnam. At present,the wild re-source of Cranoglanis bouderius has decreased rapidly because of excess utilized, and there are still some arguments on the validity of the species of the genus Cranoglanis. In order to determining the genetic structure and the validity of the spe-cies, AFLP technique was used to analyze the genetic diversity of Pearl River C. bouderias and Hainan C. bouderius. Sixty individuals from the two populations (thirty individuals per population) were analyzed by using eighteen primer combina-tions. The amplified bands of the eighteen primer combinations were in focus and repeated. The models of amplified band had distinct difference. The result of study showed that both populations had high percent of polymorphic loci and number of special bands. The genetic similarities was 0.9462±0.0237 and 0.9465±0.0226 within the population of Pearl River C. bouderius and the population of Hainan C. bouderius respectively, and was 0.9367±0.0231 between Pearl River C. bouderius and Hainan C. bouderius, the genetic similarities between populations was lower than that within population. The genetic distance was 0.0634±0.0230 between Pearl River C. bouderius and Hainan C. bouderius. The analyzed of phylo-genetic trees of two populations suggested that individuals of the same population combined together at first, and then two populations combined. The preliminary analysis result indicates that there are no prominent differences between genetic structure of Pearl River C. bouderius and Hainan C. bouderius, so they should be considered as one species.