中华口腔医学杂志
中華口腔醫學雜誌
중화구강의학잡지
Chinese Journal of Stomatology
2008年
7期
422-425
,共4页
葛起敏%ZHANG Fu-qiang
葛起敏%ZHANG Fu-qiang
갈기민%ZHANG Fu-qiang
切牙%比色板%色度参数
切牙%比色闆%色度參數
절아%비색판%색도삼수
Incisor%Shade guide%Color parameters
目的 通过测量天然牙的色度参数范围,并与三种常用比色板的色度参数范围进行比较,分析目前常用的牙科比色板存在的局限. 方法 使用数码照相机在D65光源的非球形漫射照明观测方式下拍摄比色板A(VITAPAN Classic)、B(VINTAGE Halo)、C(3D-MASTER)和上颌天然中切牙322颗,获得天然牙和3种比色板的色度参数范围并进行比较. 结果 天然牙色度参数95%正常值的范围分别如下:明度(L*)为61.631~73.250,红绿色品(±a*)为-0.719~1.879,黄蓝色品(±b*)为8.701~17.790.与天然牙相比,比色板A的色度参数范围较窄,缺少红色品与高明度色片,饱和度分布不均匀;比色板B的红色品范围较A有所扩大,但饱和度偏高;比色板C的色度参数范围最大,其饱和度和明度可完全覆盖天然牙相应的色度参数范围,但仍缺乏红色品色片. 结论 与本组天然牙的颜色范围相比,目前临床常用比色板存在覆盖不全和色片分布不均匀的局限,总体缺乏偏红色调色片.
目的 通過測量天然牙的色度參數範圍,併與三種常用比色闆的色度參數範圍進行比較,分析目前常用的牙科比色闆存在的跼限. 方法 使用數碼照相機在D65光源的非毬形漫射照明觀測方式下拍攝比色闆A(VITAPAN Classic)、B(VINTAGE Halo)、C(3D-MASTER)和上頜天然中切牙322顆,穫得天然牙和3種比色闆的色度參數範圍併進行比較. 結果 天然牙色度參數95%正常值的範圍分彆如下:明度(L*)為61.631~73.250,紅綠色品(±a*)為-0.719~1.879,黃藍色品(±b*)為8.701~17.790.與天然牙相比,比色闆A的色度參數範圍較窄,缺少紅色品與高明度色片,飽和度分佈不均勻;比色闆B的紅色品範圍較A有所擴大,但飽和度偏高;比色闆C的色度參數範圍最大,其飽和度和明度可完全覆蓋天然牙相應的色度參數範圍,但仍缺乏紅色品色片. 結論 與本組天然牙的顏色範圍相比,目前臨床常用比色闆存在覆蓋不全和色片分佈不均勻的跼限,總體缺乏偏紅色調色片.
목적 통과측량천연아적색도삼수범위,병여삼충상용비색판적색도삼수범위진행비교,분석목전상용적아과비색판존재적국한. 방법 사용수마조상궤재D65광원적비구형만사조명관측방식하박섭비색판A(VITAPAN Classic)、B(VINTAGE Halo)、C(3D-MASTER)화상합천연중절아322과,획득천연아화3충비색판적색도삼수범위병진행비교. 결과 천연아색도삼수95%정상치적범위분별여하:명도(L*)위61.631~73.250,홍록색품(±a*)위-0.719~1.879,황람색품(±b*)위8.701~17.790.여천연아상비,비색판A적색도삼수범위교착,결소홍색품여고명도색편,포화도분포불균균;비색판B적홍색품범위교A유소확대,단포화도편고;비색판C적색도삼수범위최대,기포화도화명도가완전복개천연아상응적색도삼수범위,단잉결핍홍색품색편. 결론 여본조천연아적안색범위상비,목전림상상용비색판존재복개불전화색편분포불균균적국한,총체결핍편홍색조색편.
Objective To analyze the limitation of currently used shade guide systems comparing with color range of nature teeth. Methods Digital pictures of shade guide systems A (VITAPAN Classic), B(VINTAGE Halo), C(3D-MASTER), and 322 central incisors were taken under the same condition as light source of D65 with the observation method of d/0°. The data obtained from nature tooth color were compared with the color range of three shade guide systems mentioned above in items of L*a*b*/C* H°. Results The normal chroma value (95%) of the natural teeth were L* 61. 631-73. 250, a* - 0.719-1. 879,and b* 8.701-17.790. Natural tooth colors were different from those of the shade guide system A which color range was narrower, short of red hue, higher values, and unevenly distribution of saturation. On the other hand, the range of red hue increased in shade guide system B while its saturation was slightly high. The color range of shade guide system C was greatest among the three shade guide systems. The saturation and value of shade guide system C covered all varieties of nature teeth measured in this research, but it still lacked red hue comparing to the nature teeth. Conclusions Comparing the color range of nature teeth, the shade guide systems used in clinic have uneven hue distribution and cannot cover all colors of nature teeth. Generally, all the shade guide systems are lack of the hues which are named under the category of red tone.