中国综合临床
中國綜閤臨床
중국종합림상
CLINICAL MEDICINE OF CHINA
2011年
1期
1-4
,共4页
王艳华%韩大成%杨明%颜勇卿%张培训%付中国%张宏波%张殿英
王豔華%韓大成%楊明%顏勇卿%張培訓%付中國%張宏波%張殿英
왕염화%한대성%양명%안용경%장배훈%부중국%장굉파%장전영
肱骨髁间骨折%内固定%肘关节置换
肱骨髁間骨摺%內固定%肘關節置換
굉골과간골절%내고정%주관절치환
Humeral fractures%Internal fixation%Elbow replacement
目的 探讨切开复位、板钉内固定和肘关节置换手术治疗肱骨髁间骨折的疗效.方法 1999年1月至2009年5月期间经手术治疗的肱骨髁间骨折患者46例,经过平均17个月的随访,随访到38例.对所有随访患者进行Cassebaum评分,对关节置换患者加用Mayo评分和DASH评分.结果 采用Cassebaum评分标准评估患者的疗效,其中优22例,良8例,可5例,差3例,优良率为78.9%(30/38);关节置换患者Mayo评分为75.0~90.0分,平均(84.4±1.7)分;DASH评分为25.0~75.0分,平均(41.1±0.8)分.1例鹰嘴截骨患者出现鹰嘴不愈合,1例伤口不愈合,2例有尺神经症状,1例肘关节屈伸肌力Ⅳ级.结论 根据骨折分型及患者情况合理运用内固定和肘关节置换是治疗肱骨髁间骨折的良好方法.
目的 探討切開複位、闆釘內固定和肘關節置換手術治療肱骨髁間骨摺的療效.方法 1999年1月至2009年5月期間經手術治療的肱骨髁間骨摺患者46例,經過平均17箇月的隨訪,隨訪到38例.對所有隨訪患者進行Cassebaum評分,對關節置換患者加用Mayo評分和DASH評分.結果 採用Cassebaum評分標準評估患者的療效,其中優22例,良8例,可5例,差3例,優良率為78.9%(30/38);關節置換患者Mayo評分為75.0~90.0分,平均(84.4±1.7)分;DASH評分為25.0~75.0分,平均(41.1±0.8)分.1例鷹嘴截骨患者齣現鷹嘴不愈閤,1例傷口不愈閤,2例有呎神經癥狀,1例肘關節屈伸肌力Ⅳ級.結論 根據骨摺分型及患者情況閤理運用內固定和肘關節置換是治療肱骨髁間骨摺的良好方法.
목적 탐토절개복위、판정내고정화주관절치환수술치료굉골과간골절적료효.방법 1999년1월지2009년5월기간경수술치료적굉골과간골절환자46례,경과평균17개월적수방,수방도38례.대소유수방환자진행Cassebaum평분,대관절치환환자가용Mayo평분화DASH평분.결과 채용Cassebaum평분표준평고환자적료효,기중우22례,량8례,가5례,차3례,우량솔위78.9%(30/38);관절치환환자Mayo평분위75.0~90.0분,평균(84.4±1.7)분;DASH평분위25.0~75.0분,평균(41.1±0.8)분.1례응취절골환자출현응취불유합,1례상구불유합,2례유척신경증상,1례주관절굴신기력Ⅳ급.결론 근거골절분형급환자정황합리운용내고정화주관절치환시치료굉골과간골절적량호방법.
Objective To assess the efficienty of operation in humeral intercondylar fractures by section, reposition, internal fixation by composition nail and replacement of elbow joint. Methods From January, 1999 to May, 2009, Forty-six cases of the humeral intercondylar fracture were treated with operation. Thirty-eight cases were followed for 17 months. Their affected elbow joint function were evaluated by Cassebaum rating system, patients treated with total elbow replacement evaluated by Mayo elbow score, DASH score additionally. Results According to Cassebaum rating system,there were 22 cases rated as excellent,eight cases rated as good,five cases rated as poor,three case rated as poor. The fineness rate is 78. 9% (30/38). Mayo score in patients with joint replacement ranged from 75.0 - 90. 0, averaged 84. 4 ± 1.7. DASH score ranged from 25.0 to 75.0,averaged 41. 1 ±0. 8. There was 1 case of superficial soft tissue nonhealing and 2 cases of ulna nerve symptoms. Myodynamia in elbow joint bend and stretch was Ⅳ in 1 cases. Conclusion It is a good method to treat the humeral intercondylar fracture with rational use of open reduction or elbow replacement according to fracture type and patient condition.