中华医学杂志
中華醫學雜誌
중화의학잡지
National Medical Journal of China
2012年
16期
1138-1142
,共5页
甲胎蛋白类%肝肿瘤%疫苗%免疫效应
甲胎蛋白類%肝腫瘤%疫苗%免疫效應
갑태단백류%간종류%역묘%면역효응
alpha-Fetoproteins%Liver neoplasms%Vaccines%Immunological effect
目的 探讨来源于人甲胎蛋白( AFP)的细胞毒性T淋巴细胞(CTL)表位多抗原肽(MAP)疫苗对原发性肝癌的抗肿瘤活性.方法 体外分离培养人类白细胞抗原(HLA)-A2.1阳性的健康志愿者外周血和HLA-A2.1转基因小鼠骨髓来源的成熟树突细胞(DC),用DC负载多肽疫苗,体内外诱导效应细胞,采用标准4 h 51Cr释放实验和酶联免疫斑点技术(ELISPOT)检测CTL活性.结果 (1)在最高效靶比时CTL表位MAP疫苗诱导的效应细胞对AFP阳性并且HLA-A2.1阳性的Hep3B肝癌细胞的杀伤率显著高于单肽表位诱导的效应细胞(73.5%±7.9%比45.6%±6.9%,P<0.01).(2)最高效靶比时AFP表位MAP疫苗和单肽疫苗诱导的效应细胞对AFP阴性而HLA-A2.1阳性的PLC/PRF/5肝癌细胞的杀伤率与阴性肽对照组比较,差异均无统计学意义(9.3%±3.9%、8.1%±2.8%比8.3%±2.6%,均P>0.05);MAP组和对应单肽组效应细胞对转染AFP全长cDNA的PLC/PRF/5/Ad-AFP肝癌细胞的杀伤率均显著高于阴性肽对照组(74.8%±10.5%、51.4%±12.6%比4.2%±1.3%,均P<0.01),而且MAP诱导的CTL对PLC/PRF/5/AFP肝癌细胞的杀伤率显著高于相应单肽(P<0.01).(3)最高效靶比时AFP表位MAP疫苗和单肽疫苗诱导的效应细胞对AFP阳性但HLA-A2.1阴性的HepG2肝癌细胞的杀伤率与阴性肽对照组差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05);其对转染了HLA-A2.1全长cDNA的HepG2/HLA-A2.1细胞的杀伤率则均显著高于阴性肽对照组(71.8%±8.6%、46.5%±6.5%比4.1%±1.1%,均P<0.01),MAP诱导的CTL对HepG2/HLA-A2.1的杀伤率显著高于相应单肽(P<0.01).(4)AFP表位MAP疫苗和单肽疫苗诱导的效应细胞产生的IFN-γ斑点数均显著高于阴性对照肽[(158 ±23)、(78±12)比(3±1)斑点/105个细胞,均P <0.01],MAP的斑点数与阳性对照组[(166±32)斑点/105个细胞]差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),MAP的斑点数亦显著高于其单肽[(78±12)斑点/105个细胞,P<0.01].结论 AFP MAP诱导的CTL反应强于相应单肽诱导的CTL反应,对AFP阳性且HLA-A2.1相匹配的肿瘤细胞具有明显的杀伤效应;对AFP阴性的肿瘤细胞不具有杀伤效应.
目的 探討來源于人甲胎蛋白( AFP)的細胞毒性T淋巴細胞(CTL)錶位多抗原肽(MAP)疫苗對原髮性肝癌的抗腫瘤活性.方法 體外分離培養人類白細胞抗原(HLA)-A2.1暘性的健康誌願者外週血和HLA-A2.1轉基因小鼠骨髓來源的成熟樹突細胞(DC),用DC負載多肽疫苗,體內外誘導效應細胞,採用標準4 h 51Cr釋放實驗和酶聯免疫斑點技術(ELISPOT)檢測CTL活性.結果 (1)在最高效靶比時CTL錶位MAP疫苗誘導的效應細胞對AFP暘性併且HLA-A2.1暘性的Hep3B肝癌細胞的殺傷率顯著高于單肽錶位誘導的效應細胞(73.5%±7.9%比45.6%±6.9%,P<0.01).(2)最高效靶比時AFP錶位MAP疫苗和單肽疫苗誘導的效應細胞對AFP陰性而HLA-A2.1暘性的PLC/PRF/5肝癌細胞的殺傷率與陰性肽對照組比較,差異均無統計學意義(9.3%±3.9%、8.1%±2.8%比8.3%±2.6%,均P>0.05);MAP組和對應單肽組效應細胞對轉染AFP全長cDNA的PLC/PRF/5/Ad-AFP肝癌細胞的殺傷率均顯著高于陰性肽對照組(74.8%±10.5%、51.4%±12.6%比4.2%±1.3%,均P<0.01),而且MAP誘導的CTL對PLC/PRF/5/AFP肝癌細胞的殺傷率顯著高于相應單肽(P<0.01).(3)最高效靶比時AFP錶位MAP疫苗和單肽疫苗誘導的效應細胞對AFP暘性但HLA-A2.1陰性的HepG2肝癌細胞的殺傷率與陰性肽對照組差異均無統計學意義(均P>0.05);其對轉染瞭HLA-A2.1全長cDNA的HepG2/HLA-A2.1細胞的殺傷率則均顯著高于陰性肽對照組(71.8%±8.6%、46.5%±6.5%比4.1%±1.1%,均P<0.01),MAP誘導的CTL對HepG2/HLA-A2.1的殺傷率顯著高于相應單肽(P<0.01).(4)AFP錶位MAP疫苗和單肽疫苗誘導的效應細胞產生的IFN-γ斑點數均顯著高于陰性對照肽[(158 ±23)、(78±12)比(3±1)斑點/105箇細胞,均P <0.01],MAP的斑點數與暘性對照組[(166±32)斑點/105箇細胞]差異無統計學意義(P>0.05),MAP的斑點數亦顯著高于其單肽[(78±12)斑點/105箇細胞,P<0.01].結論 AFP MAP誘導的CTL反應彊于相應單肽誘導的CTL反應,對AFP暘性且HLA-A2.1相匹配的腫瘤細胞具有明顯的殺傷效應;對AFP陰性的腫瘤細胞不具有殺傷效應.
목적 탐토래원우인갑태단백( AFP)적세포독성T림파세포(CTL)표위다항원태(MAP)역묘대원발성간암적항종류활성.방법 체외분리배양인류백세포항원(HLA)-A2.1양성적건강지원자외주혈화HLA-A2.1전기인소서골수래원적성숙수돌세포(DC),용DC부재다태역묘,체내외유도효응세포,채용표준4 h 51Cr석방실험화매련면역반점기술(ELISPOT)검측CTL활성.결과 (1)재최고효파비시CTL표위MAP역묘유도적효응세포대AFP양성병차HLA-A2.1양성적Hep3B간암세포적살상솔현저고우단태표위유도적효응세포(73.5%±7.9%비45.6%±6.9%,P<0.01).(2)최고효파비시AFP표위MAP역묘화단태역묘유도적효응세포대AFP음성이HLA-A2.1양성적PLC/PRF/5간암세포적살상솔여음성태대조조비교,차이균무통계학의의(9.3%±3.9%、8.1%±2.8%비8.3%±2.6%,균P>0.05);MAP조화대응단태조효응세포대전염AFP전장cDNA적PLC/PRF/5/Ad-AFP간암세포적살상솔균현저고우음성태대조조(74.8%±10.5%、51.4%±12.6%비4.2%±1.3%,균P<0.01),이차MAP유도적CTL대PLC/PRF/5/AFP간암세포적살상솔현저고우상응단태(P<0.01).(3)최고효파비시AFP표위MAP역묘화단태역묘유도적효응세포대AFP양성단HLA-A2.1음성적HepG2간암세포적살상솔여음성태대조조차이균무통계학의의(균P>0.05);기대전염료HLA-A2.1전장cDNA적HepG2/HLA-A2.1세포적살상솔칙균현저고우음성태대조조(71.8%±8.6%、46.5%±6.5%비4.1%±1.1%,균P<0.01),MAP유도적CTL대HepG2/HLA-A2.1적살상솔현저고우상응단태(P<0.01).(4)AFP표위MAP역묘화단태역묘유도적효응세포산생적IFN-γ반점수균현저고우음성대조태[(158 ±23)、(78±12)비(3±1)반점/105개세포,균P <0.01],MAP적반점수여양성대조조[(166±32)반점/105개세포]차이무통계학의의(P>0.05),MAP적반점수역현저고우기단태[(78±12)반점/105개세포,P<0.01].결론 AFP MAP유도적CTL반응강우상응단태유도적CTL반응,대AFP양성차HLA-A2.1상필배적종류세포구유명현적살상효응;대AFP음성적종류세포불구유살상효응.
Objective To explore the antitumor effects of multiple antigen peptide (MAP) vaccine from α-fetoprotein (AFP) through AFP-specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) against hepatoma in vitro and ex vivo.Methods Dendritic cells ( DC ) were generated from human perpheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) and HLA-A2.l-transgenic murine bone marrow.The AFP-specific CTL were induced by MAPloaded DC and the corresponding linear peptides from human AFP.The lysis rate of effectors to hepatoma cells were tested by 4h51Cr release assay.And enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot(ELISPOT) was used to test the interferon (IFN) -γ release of effector cells.Results The specific lysis rate of effectors induced by AFP epitopic MAP vaccines to Hep3B cells (AFP+,HLA-A2.1+ ) at the highest effector/target (E/T)ratio was significantly higher than linear peptide vaccine (73.5% ±7.9% vs 45.6% ±6.9%,P <0.01 ).The effectors induced by AFP epitopic MAP vaccine and linear peptide vaccine could not lyze the AFP-negative PLC/PRF/5 liver cancer cells versus the negative control group at the highest E/T (9.3% ±3.9%,8.1% ±2.8% vs 8.3% ±2.6%,both P >0.05).But the effectors induced by AFP epitopic MAP vaccine and linear peptide vaccine could lyse PLC/PRF/5 liver cancer cells transfected with cDNA of AFP versus the negative control group (74.8% ± 10.5%,51.4% ± 12.6% vs 4.2% ± 1.3%,both P <0.01 ).And the specific lysis rate of effectors induced by AFP epitopic MAP vaccines was significantly higher than the corresponding linear peptide vaccine ( P < 0.01 ). Compared with the negative control group,the effectors could not lyse HepG2 liver cancer cells,a HLA-A2.1 negative cell line ( both P > 0.05 ).But the effectors could lyse HepG2 cells transfected with cDNA of HLA-A2.1 (71.8% ± 8.6%,46.5% ± 6.5% vs 4.1% ± 1.1%,both P < 0.01 ). And the specific lysis rate of effectors induced by MAP vaccine was significantly higher than the corresponding linear peptide vaccine (P < 0.01 ).ELISPOT test showed that the capability of enhancing IFN-γ release of human AFP MAPs was stronger than that of the AFP linear peptides.The spots count of MAP vaccine group ( ( 158 ± 23 ) spots/105 cells ) or linear peptide vaccine group ((78 ± 12) spots/105 cells) were significantly higher than the negative control group ((3 ± 1)spots/105 cells) ( all P < 0.01 ).The spots count of the positive control group ( ( 166 ± 32) spots/105 cells)showed no significant difference with the AFP MAP vaccine group ( P > 0.05 ).And the spots count of MAP vaccine group were significantly higher than the corresponding linear peptide vaccine group ((78 ± 12)spots/105 cells,P < 0.01 ).Conclusions AFP multiple antigen peptides elicit not only more powerful specific anti-tumor immune responses but also stronger non-specific anti-tumor immune activities than their corresponding linear peptides. These findings will provide theoretical rationales for their clinical applications.