中国康复医学杂志
中國康複醫學雜誌
중국강복의학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE
2009年
11期
1018-1020
,共3页
汪流%林秀瑶%许云辉%朱达斌%王景峰
汪流%林秀瑤%許雲輝%硃達斌%王景峰
왕류%림수요%허운휘%주체빈%왕경봉
高血压%有氧运动%动态血压%生存质量
高血壓%有氧運動%動態血壓%生存質量
고혈압%유양운동%동태혈압%생존질량
hypertension%aerobic exercises%dynamic blood pressure%quality of life
目的:比较两种不同强度的有氧运动训练对高血压病患者动态血压和生存质量的影响.方法:将收治的60例高血压病患者随机分为A组和B组,接受强度分别为20%和60%最大运动能力的10周有氧运动训练.试验开始和结束时分别进行动态血压监测和生存质量的评价.结果:2组患者治疗后各项动态血压指标均有下降,差异无显著性(P>0.05).治疗后2组患者SF-36量表各维度评分中躯体疼痛和社会功能与治疗前比较无显著性差异(P>0.05),其他6项指标:躯体功能、躯体角色、总体健康状况、活力、情感角色和心理健康,与治疗前比较均有显著性差异(P<0.05).治疗后SF-36量表各维度评分,其4项指标:总体健康状况、活力、情感角色和心理健康,A组均高于B组(P<0.05).结论:采用最大运动能力的20%和60%的强度进行有氧训练可以取得相似的降压效果,但采用最大运动能力的20%的运动强度对于提高患者的生存质量效果更好.
目的:比較兩種不同彊度的有氧運動訓練對高血壓病患者動態血壓和生存質量的影響.方法:將收治的60例高血壓病患者隨機分為A組和B組,接受彊度分彆為20%和60%最大運動能力的10週有氧運動訓練.試驗開始和結束時分彆進行動態血壓鑑測和生存質量的評價.結果:2組患者治療後各項動態血壓指標均有下降,差異無顯著性(P>0.05).治療後2組患者SF-36量錶各維度評分中軀體疼痛和社會功能與治療前比較無顯著性差異(P>0.05),其他6項指標:軀體功能、軀體角色、總體健康狀況、活力、情感角色和心理健康,與治療前比較均有顯著性差異(P<0.05).治療後SF-36量錶各維度評分,其4項指標:總體健康狀況、活力、情感角色和心理健康,A組均高于B組(P<0.05).結論:採用最大運動能力的20%和60%的彊度進行有氧訓練可以取得相似的降壓效果,但採用最大運動能力的20%的運動彊度對于提高患者的生存質量效果更好.
목적:비교량충불동강도적유양운동훈련대고혈압병환자동태혈압화생존질량적영향.방법:장수치적60례고혈압병환자수궤분위A조화B조,접수강도분별위20%화60%최대운동능력적10주유양운동훈련.시험개시화결속시분별진행동태혈압감측화생존질량적평개.결과:2조환자치료후각항동태혈압지표균유하강,차이무현저성(P>0.05).치료후2조환자SF-36량표각유도평분중구체동통화사회공능여치료전비교무현저성차이(P>0.05),기타6항지표:구체공능、구체각색、총체건강상황、활력、정감각색화심리건강,여치료전비교균유현저성차이(P<0.05).치료후SF-36량표각유도평분,기4항지표:총체건강상황、활력、정감각색화심리건강,A조균고우B조(P<0.05).결론:채용최대운동능력적20%화60%적강도진행유양훈련가이취득상사적강압효과,단채용최대운동능력적20%적운동강도대우제고환자적생존질량효과경호.
Objective: To compare the effects of aerobic exercises training of two different intensities on dynamic blood pressure (DBP) and quality of life (QOL) in hypertension patients. Method: Sixty hypertension patients were randomly allocated into 2 groups, and were treated with aerobic exercises training at 20% or 60% of maximal intensity for 10 weeks, respectively .The DBP was monitored and QOL was assessed with SF-36 scale pre-and post-therapy. Result: There was no significant difference of decreasing degree of each parameter of DBP in both groups (P>0.05). After treatment, the result of SF-36 scale assessment showed that there was no significant difference for bodily pain(BP) and social functioning(SF) in both groups (P>0.05). There were significant differences of increasing degree of general health (GH), vitality (VT), role emotional (RE) and mental health (MH) between two groups after treatment, and that of A group was better than that of B group (P<0.05). Conclusion: The aerobic exercises training at 20% and 60% of maximal intensity provide similar effects on DBP. But QOL of patients were significantly better after aerobic exercises training at 20% of maximal intensity.