中华检验医学杂志
中華檢驗醫學雜誌
중화검험의학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF LABORATORY MEDICINE
2011年
8期
700-704
,共5页
孙谦%张嵘%张艳%柯文鸿%柳正卫%周宏伟%胡燕燕%陈功祥
孫謙%張嶸%張豔%柯文鴻%柳正衛%週宏偉%鬍燕燕%陳功祥
손겸%장영%장염%가문홍%류정위%주굉위%호연연%진공상
分枝杆菌属%RNA%核糖体%16S%细菌蛋白质类%热休克蛋白质类%聚合酶链反应%多态性%限制性片段长度
分枝桿菌屬%RNA%覈糖體%16S%細菌蛋白質類%熱休剋蛋白質類%聚閤酶鏈反應%多態性%限製性片段長度
분지간균속%RNA%핵당체%16S%세균단백질류%열휴극단백질류%취합매련반응%다태성%한제성편단장도
Mycobacterium%RNA,ribosomal,16S%Bacterial proteins%Heat-shock proteins%Polymerase chain reaction%Polymorphism,restriction fragment length
目的 评价3种分子生物学方法快速鉴定非结核分枝杆菌的优缺点.方法 收集41株临床分离的非结核分枝杆菌,以16S rRNA基因测序方法为标准,同时以hsp65基因测序方法及PCR-RFLP方法鉴定菌株,与16S rRNA基因测序结果进行比较.结果 41株非结核分枝杆菌16SrRNA基因测序结果:9株龟分枝杆菌复合群,7株偶发分枝杆菌,7株胞内分枝杆菌,3株鸟分枝杆菌,3株堪萨斯分枝杆菌复合群,3株耻垢分枝杆菌,3株土分枝杆菌,2株草分枝杆菌,2株无色分枝杆菌,1株瘰疬分枝杆菌,1株M.arupense.与16S rRNA基因测序相比较,hs65 PCR-RFLP能鉴定9株龟分枝杆菌复合群至亚种脓肿分枝杆菌,3株堪萨斯分枝杆菌复合群鉴定至亚种堪萨斯分枝杆菌;1株偶发分枝杆菌及1株无色分枝杆菌与其不符;其余菌株鉴定结果一致,符合率为95.1%(39/41).hsp65基因测序结果显示,1株爱尔兰分枝杆菌与16S rRNA测序结果不符,其余菌株鉴定结果与其一致,符合率为97.6%(40/41),并且能进一步将9株龟分枝杆菌复合群鉴定至亚种脓肿分枝杆菌,3株堪萨斯分枝杆菌复合群鉴定至亚种堪萨斯分枝杆菌.结论 3种方法均能快速鉴定非结核分枝杆菌.与16S rRNA基因测序相比,hsp65基因测序及hsp65 PCR-RFLP更容易鉴定临床最常见非结核分枝杆菌(如堪萨斯分枝杆菌和脓肿分枝杆菌),可在临床推广使用.
目的 評價3種分子生物學方法快速鑒定非結覈分枝桿菌的優缺點.方法 收集41株臨床分離的非結覈分枝桿菌,以16S rRNA基因測序方法為標準,同時以hsp65基因測序方法及PCR-RFLP方法鑒定菌株,與16S rRNA基因測序結果進行比較.結果 41株非結覈分枝桿菌16SrRNA基因測序結果:9株龜分枝桿菌複閤群,7株偶髮分枝桿菌,7株胞內分枝桿菌,3株鳥分枝桿菌,3株堪薩斯分枝桿菌複閤群,3株恥垢分枝桿菌,3株土分枝桿菌,2株草分枝桿菌,2株無色分枝桿菌,1株瘰疬分枝桿菌,1株M.arupense.與16S rRNA基因測序相比較,hs65 PCR-RFLP能鑒定9株龜分枝桿菌複閤群至亞種膿腫分枝桿菌,3株堪薩斯分枝桿菌複閤群鑒定至亞種堪薩斯分枝桿菌;1株偶髮分枝桿菌及1株無色分枝桿菌與其不符;其餘菌株鑒定結果一緻,符閤率為95.1%(39/41).hsp65基因測序結果顯示,1株愛爾蘭分枝桿菌與16S rRNA測序結果不符,其餘菌株鑒定結果與其一緻,符閤率為97.6%(40/41),併且能進一步將9株龜分枝桿菌複閤群鑒定至亞種膿腫分枝桿菌,3株堪薩斯分枝桿菌複閤群鑒定至亞種堪薩斯分枝桿菌.結論 3種方法均能快速鑒定非結覈分枝桿菌.與16S rRNA基因測序相比,hsp65基因測序及hsp65 PCR-RFLP更容易鑒定臨床最常見非結覈分枝桿菌(如堪薩斯分枝桿菌和膿腫分枝桿菌),可在臨床推廣使用.
목적 평개3충분자생물학방법쾌속감정비결핵분지간균적우결점.방법 수집41주림상분리적비결핵분지간균,이16S rRNA기인측서방법위표준,동시이hsp65기인측서방법급PCR-RFLP방법감정균주,여16S rRNA기인측서결과진행비교.결과 41주비결핵분지간균16SrRNA기인측서결과:9주구분지간균복합군,7주우발분지간균,7주포내분지간균,3주조분지간균,3주감살사분지간균복합군,3주치구분지간균,3주토분지간균,2주초분지간균,2주무색분지간균,1주라력분지간균,1주M.arupense.여16S rRNA기인측서상비교,hs65 PCR-RFLP능감정9주구분지간균복합군지아충농종분지간균,3주감살사분지간균복합군감정지아충감살사분지간균;1주우발분지간균급1주무색분지간균여기불부;기여균주감정결과일치,부합솔위95.1%(39/41).hsp65기인측서결과현시,1주애이란분지간균여16S rRNA측서결과불부,기여균주감정결과여기일치,부합솔위97.6%(40/41),병차능진일보장9주구분지간균복합군감정지아충농종분지간균,3주감살사분지간균복합군감정지아충감살사분지간균.결론 3충방법균능쾌속감정비결핵분지간균.여16S rRNA기인측서상비,hsp65기인측서급hsp65 PCR-RFLP경용역감정림상최상견비결핵분지간균(여감살사분지간균화농종분지간균),가재림상추엄사용.
Objective To evaluate three molecular methods for rapid identification of nontuberculous Mycobacterium(NTM).Methods Forty-one clinical NTM isolates were collected and 16S rRNA gene sequencing was used as the standard method for NTM identification.Meanwhile,the restriction fragment length polymorphism of hsp65 PCR-RFLP and hsp65 gene sequencing were used to identify NTM strains and compared with 16S rRNA gene sequencing.Results The results of 16S rRNA sequencing showed that there were nine Mycobacterium chelonae complex strains,seven Mycobacteriumfortuitum strains,seven Mycobacterium intracellulare strains,three Mycobacterium avium strains,three Mycobacterium kansasii complex strains, three Mycobacterium smegmatis strains, three Mycobacterium terrae strains, two Mycobacterium phlei strains,two Mycobacterium nonchromogenicum strains,one Mycobacterium scrofulaceum strain and one Mycobacterium arupense strain.Compared with 16S rRNA gene sequencing,hsp65 PCR-RFLP could identify nine Mycobacterium chelonae complexes and three Mycobacterium kansasii complexes to subspecies Mycobacterium abscessus and Mycobacterium kansasii,respectively; One Mycobacterium fortuitum strain and one Mycobacterium nonchromogenicum strain were different from 16S rRNA gene sequencing results ,but other isolates were the same.The coincidence was 95.1%.By hsp65 gene sequencing,only one identification of Mycobacterium hiberniae strain was different from 16S rRNA gene sequencing and the coincidence was 97.6%.And hsp65 gene sequencing could further identify nine Mycobacterium chelonae complexes and three Mycobacterium kansasii complexes to subspecies Mycobacterium abscessus and Mycobacterium kansasii,respectively.Conclusions All three molecular methods can identify NTM strains rapidly.Compared with 16S rRNA gene sequencing,hsp65 gene sequencing and hsp65 PCR-RFLP are easier to identify clinical common NTM strains(such as Mycobacterium kansasii and Mycobacterium abscessus),and can be widely used in clinical practice.