中华预防医学杂志
中華預防醫學雜誌
중화예방의학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF
2012年
1期
70-75
,共6页
魏立璇%张凯%杨琳%郭兰伟%陈玉恒%李倩%代敏%李霓
魏立璇%張凱%楊琳%郭蘭偉%陳玉恆%李倩%代敏%李霓
위립선%장개%양림%곽란위%진옥항%리천%대민%리예
宫颈肿瘤%宫颈上皮内瘤样病变%Meta分析[文献类型]%醋酸染色肉眼观察法
宮頸腫瘤%宮頸上皮內瘤樣病變%Meta分析[文獻類型]%醋痠染色肉眼觀察法
궁경종류%궁경상피내류양병변%Meta분석[문헌류형]%작산염색육안관찰법
Uterine cervical neoplasms%Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia%Meta-analysis [publication type]%Visual inspection with acetic acid
目的 通过诊断试验Meta分析,评价在中国女性中使用醋酸染色肉眼观察法(VIA)对宫颈癌及其癌前病变进行初筛的效果.方法 以“醋酸”、“宫颈上皮内瘤样病变”、“宫颈癌”、“visual inspection with acetic acid”、“CIN”和“cervical cancer”作为检索词分别检索万方数据库、中国知网(CNKI)、维普中文科技期刊全文数据库、Pubmed、Cochrane图书馆等,并对所获文献中的参考文献进行二次检索,收集关于在中国妇女中开展VIA初筛宫颈癌及其癌前病变的相关文献,共检索到相关文献40篇.采用SAS 8.02进行双变量随机效应模型进行统计学分析.结果 最终有22篇文献符合纳入标准,包括中文文献19篇,英文文献3篇,纳入研究对象共计23 330名.入选文献年限跨度为2004-2010年,研究对象年龄范围为15~ 81岁.按不同筛查病变阈值分层后可见,VIA初筛轻度及以上宫颈上皮内瘤样病变(CIN1+)的加权诊断比值比(DOR) [4.11 (95% CI:3.20 ~5.04)]与中度及以上病变(CIN2+)[4.45(95%CI:3.73 ~5.15)]相近.CIN1+和CIN2+在40岁及以下中国女性中VIA的DOR[CIN1+为4.22(95% CI:3.29~5.16);CIN2+为4.53(95%CI:3.46 ~5.47)]也均与40岁以上女性相近[CIN1+为3.66(95% CI:2.27 ~5.37);CIN2+为4.26(95% CI:3.32~5.26)].对于CIN2+,县级医院筛查效果与市级及以上医院无区别,DOR分别为4.62(95%CI:3.13 ~5.93)和4.48(95%CI:3.71 ~5.16).结论 VIA对于各级病变和各年龄段人群筛查效果较为一致,县级医院的医生经培训后能够达到与市级医院一样的水平.
目的 通過診斷試驗Meta分析,評價在中國女性中使用醋痠染色肉眼觀察法(VIA)對宮頸癌及其癌前病變進行初篩的效果.方法 以“醋痠”、“宮頸上皮內瘤樣病變”、“宮頸癌”、“visual inspection with acetic acid”、“CIN”和“cervical cancer”作為檢索詞分彆檢索萬方數據庫、中國知網(CNKI)、維普中文科技期刊全文數據庫、Pubmed、Cochrane圖書館等,併對所穫文獻中的參攷文獻進行二次檢索,收集關于在中國婦女中開展VIA初篩宮頸癌及其癌前病變的相關文獻,共檢索到相關文獻40篇.採用SAS 8.02進行雙變量隨機效應模型進行統計學分析.結果 最終有22篇文獻符閤納入標準,包括中文文獻19篇,英文文獻3篇,納入研究對象共計23 330名.入選文獻年限跨度為2004-2010年,研究對象年齡範圍為15~ 81歲.按不同篩查病變閾值分層後可見,VIA初篩輕度及以上宮頸上皮內瘤樣病變(CIN1+)的加權診斷比值比(DOR) [4.11 (95% CI:3.20 ~5.04)]與中度及以上病變(CIN2+)[4.45(95%CI:3.73 ~5.15)]相近.CIN1+和CIN2+在40歲及以下中國女性中VIA的DOR[CIN1+為4.22(95% CI:3.29~5.16);CIN2+為4.53(95%CI:3.46 ~5.47)]也均與40歲以上女性相近[CIN1+為3.66(95% CI:2.27 ~5.37);CIN2+為4.26(95% CI:3.32~5.26)].對于CIN2+,縣級醫院篩查效果與市級及以上醫院無區彆,DOR分彆為4.62(95%CI:3.13 ~5.93)和4.48(95%CI:3.71 ~5.16).結論 VIA對于各級病變和各年齡段人群篩查效果較為一緻,縣級醫院的醫生經培訓後能夠達到與市級醫院一樣的水平.
목적 통과진단시험Meta분석,평개재중국녀성중사용작산염색육안관찰법(VIA)대궁경암급기암전병변진행초사적효과.방법 이“작산”、“궁경상피내류양병변”、“궁경암”、“visual inspection with acetic acid”、“CIN”화“cervical cancer”작위검색사분별검색만방수거고、중국지망(CNKI)、유보중문과기기간전문수거고、Pubmed、Cochrane도서관등,병대소획문헌중적삼고문헌진행이차검색,수집관우재중국부녀중개전VIA초사궁경암급기암전병변적상관문헌,공검색도상관문헌40편.채용SAS 8.02진행쌍변량수궤효응모형진행통계학분석.결과 최종유22편문헌부합납입표준,포괄중문문헌19편,영문문헌3편,납입연구대상공계23 330명.입선문헌년한과도위2004-2010년,연구대상년령범위위15~ 81세.안불동사사병변역치분층후가견,VIA초사경도급이상궁경상피내류양병변(CIN1+)적가권진단비치비(DOR) [4.11 (95% CI:3.20 ~5.04)]여중도급이상병변(CIN2+)[4.45(95%CI:3.73 ~5.15)]상근.CIN1+화CIN2+재40세급이하중국녀성중VIA적DOR[CIN1+위4.22(95% CI:3.29~5.16);CIN2+위4.53(95%CI:3.46 ~5.47)]야균여40세이상녀성상근[CIN1+위3.66(95% CI:2.27 ~5.37);CIN2+위4.26(95% CI:3.32~5.26)].대우CIN2+,현급의원사사효과여시급급이상의원무구별,DOR분별위4.62(95%CI:3.13 ~5.93)화4.48(95%CI:3.71 ~5.16).결론 VIA대우각급병변화각년령단인군사사효과교위일치,현급의원적의생경배훈후능구체도여시급의원일양적수평.
Objective To evaluate the performance of visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) in preliminary screening of cervical cancer and its precancerous lesions among Chinese women by meta-analysis of diagnosis.Methods Pubmed,Cochrane,Wanfang,CNKI and Weipu databases were employed to search for citations using the MeSH terms as "acetic acid"," cervical intraepithelial neoplasia",and "cervical cancer" both in Chinese and English.Additional relevant references cited in retrieval articles were also searched.40 pieces of research paper related with screening of cervical cancer and precancerous lesions of cervical cancer in Chinese women by VIA were collected.Bivariate random effects model was adopted using SAS 8.02.Results Twenty-two studies including 23 330 cases were finally selected in the analysis,among which 19 studies were reported in Chinese and the other 3 in English.These studies were reported from 2004to 2010 and the age-range of subjects was between 15 and 81 years old.Stratified analysis of diagnosis threshold showed that the pooled diagnostic odds ratio(DOR) of VIA for CIN1 + (4.11,95% CI:3.20 -5.04) was similar to that for C IN2 + (4.45,95 % CI: 3.73 -5.15 ).Either CIN1 + or CIN2 +,the DOR in younger women( ≤40 year) (4.22,95% CI:3.29 - 5.16 ; 4.53,95% CI:3.46 - 5.47 ) was also similar to it in older women ( > 40 year) ( 3.66,95% CI: 2.27 - 5.37 ; 4.26,95% CI: 3.32 - 5.26 ).There was no difference in the screening performance between county-level doctors (DOR =4.62,95 % CI: 3.13 -5.93 )and municipal-level doctors ( DOR =4.48,95% CI: 3.71 - 5.16 ).Conclusion The screening performances of VIA were relatively consistent among different lesion grades and aging groups of Chinese women.After professional training,there was no difference in performance between county-level hospitals and municipal-level hospitals.