中华放射学杂志
中華放射學雜誌
중화방사학잡지
Chinese Journal of Radiology
2010年
12期
1320-1323
,共4页
秦民益%朱斌%胡安宁%束昊%王钟%辛小燕%曾启龙%田传帅
秦民益%硃斌%鬍安寧%束昊%王鐘%辛小燕%曾啟龍%田傳帥
진민익%주빈%호안저%속호%왕종%신소연%증계룡%전전수
脊柱侧凸%柔韧性%放射摄影术%青少年
脊柱側凸%柔韌性%放射攝影術%青少年
척주측철%유인성%방사섭영술%청소년
Scoliosis%Flexibility%Radiography%Adolescent
目的 探讨仰卧支点加压侧屈位片评估青少年特发性脊柱侧凸(AIS)患者脊柱柔韧性的价值.方法 (1)实验研究:在同侧2个支点A-B与对侧1个支点C之间放置塑杆作压力测试,支点C位于支点A-B的中点时对塑杆加压,测量支点C加压后塑杆A侧端投影的移位数;A-C距离加倍时重复前一次的加压试验.分析加长力距对降低压力强度产生的影响.(2)临床研究:45例(男16例,女29例)AIS患儿术前检查包括全脊柱站立位正位X线平片、支点侧屈位和卧位侧屈位片,测量脊柱侧凸Cobb角,并计算带结构性弯曲的主弯柔韧性.结果 (1)支点A-C距离为25 cm,在支点C加压,压力定量刻度数分别在测量尺的1和2格时,塑杆投影移位分别为5 cm和10 cm;支点A-C距离为50 cm,在支点C加压,压力定量刻度数分别在测量尺的1和2格时,塑杆投影移位分别为8 cm和15 cm;加压支点间距越长,使塑杆投影移位的力越小.(2)45例患儿的卧位侧屈位与支点加压侧屈位片比较:男性组Cobb角分别为28.6°±4.4°、16.70°±4.6°,柔韧性分别为47.6%±8.1%、69.4%±8.5%;女性组Cobb角分别为24.5°±2.7°、12.6°±2.4°,柔韧性分别为53.4%±5.2%、76.0%±4.7%,差异均有统计学意义(P值均<0.01),且AIS患儿的脊柱主弯的柔韧性女性高于男性.结论 仰卧位支点加压技术可弥补仰卧侧屈位片主动矫形力的不足,是一种简便、安全、能准确地评价侧凸脊柱柔韧性的方法.
目的 探討仰臥支點加壓側屈位片評估青少年特髮性脊柱側凸(AIS)患者脊柱柔韌性的價值.方法 (1)實驗研究:在同側2箇支點A-B與對側1箇支點C之間放置塑桿作壓力測試,支點C位于支點A-B的中點時對塑桿加壓,測量支點C加壓後塑桿A側耑投影的移位數;A-C距離加倍時重複前一次的加壓試驗.分析加長力距對降低壓力彊度產生的影響.(2)臨床研究:45例(男16例,女29例)AIS患兒術前檢查包括全脊柱站立位正位X線平片、支點側屈位和臥位側屈位片,測量脊柱側凸Cobb角,併計算帶結構性彎麯的主彎柔韌性.結果 (1)支點A-C距離為25 cm,在支點C加壓,壓力定量刻度數分彆在測量呎的1和2格時,塑桿投影移位分彆為5 cm和10 cm;支點A-C距離為50 cm,在支點C加壓,壓力定量刻度數分彆在測量呎的1和2格時,塑桿投影移位分彆為8 cm和15 cm;加壓支點間距越長,使塑桿投影移位的力越小.(2)45例患兒的臥位側屈位與支點加壓側屈位片比較:男性組Cobb角分彆為28.6°±4.4°、16.70°±4.6°,柔韌性分彆為47.6%±8.1%、69.4%±8.5%;女性組Cobb角分彆為24.5°±2.7°、12.6°±2.4°,柔韌性分彆為53.4%±5.2%、76.0%±4.7%,差異均有統計學意義(P值均<0.01),且AIS患兒的脊柱主彎的柔韌性女性高于男性.結論 仰臥位支點加壓技術可瀰補仰臥側屈位片主動矯形力的不足,是一種簡便、安全、能準確地評價側凸脊柱柔韌性的方法.
목적 탐토앙와지점가압측굴위편평고청소년특발성척주측철(AIS)환자척주유인성적개치.방법 (1)실험연구:재동측2개지점A-B여대측1개지점C지간방치소간작압력측시,지점C위우지점A-B적중점시대소간가압,측량지점C가압후소간A측단투영적이위수;A-C거리가배시중복전일차적가압시험.분석가장력거대강저압력강도산생적영향.(2)림상연구:45례(남16례,녀29례)AIS환인술전검사포괄전척주참립위정위X선평편、지점측굴위화와위측굴위편,측량척주측철Cobb각,병계산대결구성만곡적주만유인성.결과 (1)지점A-C거리위25 cm,재지점C가압,압력정량각도수분별재측량척적1화2격시,소간투영이위분별위5 cm화10 cm;지점A-C거리위50 cm,재지점C가압,압력정량각도수분별재측량척적1화2격시,소간투영이위분별위8 cm화15 cm;가압지점간거월장,사소간투영이위적력월소.(2)45례환인적와위측굴위여지점가압측굴위편비교:남성조Cobb각분별위28.6°±4.4°、16.70°±4.6°,유인성분별위47.6%±8.1%、69.4%±8.5%;녀성조Cobb각분별위24.5°±2.7°、12.6°±2.4°,유인성분별위53.4%±5.2%、76.0%±4.7%,차이균유통계학의의(P치균<0.01),차AIS환인적척주주만적유인성녀성고우남성.결론 앙와위지점가압기술가미보앙와측굴위편주동교형력적불족,시일충간편、안전、능준학지평개측철척주유인성적방법.
Objective To examine supine fulcrum pressurized radiograph to predict spinal flexibility in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Methods 1. Empirical study: put two points (A and B) on one side of the plastic stick and one point on the other side ( C), pressurize on the plastic stick when point C is in the middle of A and B, and then measure the projection shifting of point A. Repeat the pressure test when the distance between A and C doubled. Analyze the effect of increasing distance on diminishing pressure. 2.Clinical study :45 patients ( 16 males and 29 females) underwent standing anteroposterior radiograph ,fulcrum lateral flexion radiograph, supine lateral flexion radiograph. The Cobb's angles were measured and the flexibility ratio was determined on preoperative fulcrum radiograph. Results (1) If the length of A and C was 25 cm, pressurize on point C, when pressure quantitative scale number located 1 scale and 2 scale of the rule, projection shifting of point A were 5 cm and 10 cm. If the length of A and C was 50 cm, pressurize on point C, when pressure quantitative scale number located 1 scale and 2 scale of the rule, projection shifting of point A were 8 cm and 15 cm. The longer the distance, the lesser the pressure force of plastics stick. (2)The Cobb angles and curve flexibility provided by fulcrum lateral flexion radiograph had significant difference from that provided by supine lateral flexion radiograph in male group and female group. Cobb angles of male group was 28. 6°± 4. 1 °, 16. 7°± 4. 6° respectively (t= 7. 438, P < 0. 01 )and curve flexibility was 47. 6% ±8. 1% ,69. 4% ± 8. 5% respectively( t = 7. 438, P < 0. 01 ). Cobb angles of female group was 24.5°± 2. 7°,12. 6°±2. 4° respectively(t = 17. 540,P <0. 01 )and curve flexibility was 53.4% ±5.2% ,76. 0% ±4. 7% respectively(t = 17. 54, P < 0. 01 ). The flexibility of spinal main curve of female patients was obviously higher than male patients. Conclusions Supine fulcrum pressurized technique can make up for the insufficiency of supine lateral flexion technique, and provide a convenient, safe, precise and useful method for evaluation of spinal flexibility in AIS.