中国实用眼科杂志
中國實用眼科雜誌
중국실용안과잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF PRACTICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY
2011年
8期
798-801
,共4页
李炳震%周臻%马志中%王常观%冯学峰%张纯
李炳震%週臻%馬誌中%王常觀%馮學峰%張純
리병진%주진%마지중%왕상관%풍학봉%장순
玻璃体切割术%ICare回弹式眼压计%眼压测量%气体充填眼%硅油眼
玻璃體切割術%ICare迴彈式眼壓計%眼壓測量%氣體充填眼%硅油眼
파리체절할술%ICare회탄식안압계%안압측량%기체충전안%규유안
Vitrectomy ICare%Rebound tonometer%Tonometry%Gas-filled eye%Silicone oil eye
目的 比较分析ICare回弹式眼压计(ICare rebound tonometer,RBT)、Goldmann眼压计(Goldmann applanation tonometer,GAT)及非接触眼压计(noncontacted tonometer,NCT)在玻璃体切割术后眼的眼压测量结果,探讨RBT作为玻璃体切割术后患者眼压测量方法 的应用前景.方法 选取玻璃体切割合并惰性气体充填术及合并硅油充填术的患者各40例40只眼,分别在术后第三天使用RBT、GAT及NCT进行眼压测量,使用配对t检验、Pearson相关性分析及Bland-Altman法比较三种眼压计的测量值,探讨RBT对玻璃体切割术后患者进行眼压测量的可行性.结果 实际入选玻璃体切割术后患者共80例 80只眼,其中气体充填眼40只,RBT与NCT,RBT与GAT,NCT与GAT测量值的相关系数(r)分别为0.929(P<0.01),0.899(P<0.01),0.882(P<0.01).三组测量值两两之间的均差异无统计学意义.Bland-Altman散点图显示三组测量值两两之间均具有较好的一致性.另入选硅油眼40只,RBT与NCT,RBT与GAT,NCT与GAT测量值的相关系数(r)分别为0.831(P<0.01),0.785(P<0.01),0.874(P<0.01).三组测量值两两之间差异均无统计学意义.Bland-Altman散点图显示三组测量值两两之间均具有较好的一致性.结论 对于玻璃体切割术后惰性气体充填眼或硅油眼,RBT与GAT及NCT具有较好的相关性、一致性,由于前者独特的优越性,将一定程度地解决玻璃体切割术后眼压测量比较困难的问题.
目的 比較分析ICare迴彈式眼壓計(ICare rebound tonometer,RBT)、Goldmann眼壓計(Goldmann applanation tonometer,GAT)及非接觸眼壓計(noncontacted tonometer,NCT)在玻璃體切割術後眼的眼壓測量結果,探討RBT作為玻璃體切割術後患者眼壓測量方法 的應用前景.方法 選取玻璃體切割閤併惰性氣體充填術及閤併硅油充填術的患者各40例40隻眼,分彆在術後第三天使用RBT、GAT及NCT進行眼壓測量,使用配對t檢驗、Pearson相關性分析及Bland-Altman法比較三種眼壓計的測量值,探討RBT對玻璃體切割術後患者進行眼壓測量的可行性.結果 實際入選玻璃體切割術後患者共80例 80隻眼,其中氣體充填眼40隻,RBT與NCT,RBT與GAT,NCT與GAT測量值的相關繫數(r)分彆為0.929(P<0.01),0.899(P<0.01),0.882(P<0.01).三組測量值兩兩之間的均差異無統計學意義.Bland-Altman散點圖顯示三組測量值兩兩之間均具有較好的一緻性.另入選硅油眼40隻,RBT與NCT,RBT與GAT,NCT與GAT測量值的相關繫數(r)分彆為0.831(P<0.01),0.785(P<0.01),0.874(P<0.01).三組測量值兩兩之間差異均無統計學意義.Bland-Altman散點圖顯示三組測量值兩兩之間均具有較好的一緻性.結論 對于玻璃體切割術後惰性氣體充填眼或硅油眼,RBT與GAT及NCT具有較好的相關性、一緻性,由于前者獨特的優越性,將一定程度地解決玻璃體切割術後眼壓測量比較睏難的問題.
목적 비교분석ICare회탄식안압계(ICare rebound tonometer,RBT)、Goldmann안압계(Goldmann applanation tonometer,GAT)급비접촉안압계(noncontacted tonometer,NCT)재파리체절할술후안적안압측량결과,탐토RBT작위파리체절할술후환자안압측량방법 적응용전경.방법 선취파리체절할합병타성기체충전술급합병규유충전술적환자각40례40지안,분별재술후제삼천사용RBT、GAT급NCT진행안압측량,사용배대t검험、Pearson상관성분석급Bland-Altman법비교삼충안압계적측량치,탐토RBT대파리체절할술후환자진행안압측량적가행성.결과 실제입선파리체절할술후환자공80례 80지안,기중기체충전안40지,RBT여NCT,RBT여GAT,NCT여GAT측량치적상관계수(r)분별위0.929(P<0.01),0.899(P<0.01),0.882(P<0.01).삼조측량치량량지간적균차이무통계학의의.Bland-Altman산점도현시삼조측량치량량지간균구유교호적일치성.령입선규유안40지,RBT여NCT,RBT여GAT,NCT여GAT측량치적상관계수(r)분별위0.831(P<0.01),0.785(P<0.01),0.874(P<0.01).삼조측량치량량지간차이균무통계학의의.Bland-Altman산점도현시삼조측량치량량지간균구유교호적일치성.결론 대우파리체절할술후타성기체충전안혹규유안,RBT여GAT급NCT구유교호적상관성、일치성,유우전자독특적우월성,장일정정도지해결파리체절할술후안압측량비교곤난적문제.
Objective To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) values measured in post-vitrectomy eyes by means of ICare rebound tonometer (RBT), Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAD and noncontacted tonometer (NCT), and to evaluate the feasibility of RBT. Methods The patients selected including 40 who had undergone vitrectomy with intraocular tamponade of perfluorocarbon gas and the other 40 who had undergone vitrectomy with silicon oil filling. IOP of all of the patients was measured by GAT, NCT and RBT 3 days after the operation. The results of the three measurements were evaluated by means of paired t test, Pearson correlation analysis and Bland-Altman plot. Results A total of 80 patients were recruited including 40 who had undergone vitrectomy with intraocular tamponade of perfluorocarbon gas, the correlation coefficients (r) of RBT and NCT, RBT and GAT, NCT and GAT were 0.929 (P <0.01), 0.899(P <0.01), 0.882(P <0.01) respectively, and there was no significant difference in the mean IOP measured by the three tonometers. Bland-Altman scatter plot showed reasonable inter-method agreements between IOP measurements of each technique. Another 40 patients who was performed vitrectomy with silicon oil filling, the correlation coefficients (r) of RBT and NCT, RBT and GAT, NCT and GAT were 0.831 (P <0.01), 0.785 (P <0.01), 0.874 (P <0.01), respectively. Bland-Altman scatter plot showed reasonable inter-method agreements between IOP measurements of each technique. Conclusions In post-vitrectomy eyes, the IOP measured by RBT is accurate and credible. At the same time, there are closely correlations between the IOP of RBT and the IOP of GAT and NCT.