植物生态学报
植物生態學報
식물생태학보
ACTA PHYTOECOLOGICA SINICA
2009年
6期
1148-1155
,共8页
尤鑫%龚吉蕊%葛之葳%段庆伟%安然%陈冬花%张新时
尤鑫%龔吉蕊%葛之葳%段慶偉%安然%陳鼕花%張新時
우흠%공길예%갈지위%단경위%안연%진동화%장신시
光化学猝灭%非光化学猝灭%光能转化%热能耗散%光量子通量密度
光化學猝滅%非光化學猝滅%光能轉化%熱能耗散%光量子通量密度
광화학졸멸%비광화학졸멸%광능전화%열능모산%광양자통량밀도
photochemical quenching%non-photochemical quenching%energy utilization%energy dissipation
比较研究了伊犁地区两种杂交杨伊犁杨1号(Populus deltaiids 'CV-64'(P64))和伊犁杨小叶杨(P.simonii canadenxp.russkii-9(Jia))对太阳辐射光能的利用和耗散特性.两种杂交杨光合速率(P_n)的日变化均呈现双峰型,高光量子通量密度(PFD)阶段P_n达到20.1%的差距;实际最大光化学猝灭ФPSII日变化均呈"U"型,于16:30时,P64的ФPSII达到最低值,而Jia的值于14:30时达到最低(Jia>P64);光合系统的闭合程度(L)在14:30时均出现一个短暂回落,全天平均闭合程度无显著差异(p>0.05).非光化学猝灭系数(NPQ)在16:30M时达到最大值(Jia>P64),两者NPQ全天相差31.7%.叶片转化吸收太阳能热能耗散(E,D)和光化学反应转化的光能量(E.P)进行估算表明:在PFD较低的环境条件下,两种杂交杨将吸收的光能50%以上用于光化学猝灭;在PFD较高的环境条件下,P64的E.P值比例大于Jia.两者全天的E.P值没有太大的差异,P64的E.D值显著大于Jia的E.D值(P>0.01),而P64的E.D值占全天转化能量的比例小于Jia.P64和Jia的E.P达到最大的估算值时,其E.D也达到了最大.分析结果表明:两种杂交杨对高光能形成不同的适应机制,P64利用更多的太阳能进行光化学猝灭反应,而Jia利用更多的太阳能进行非光化学猝灭反应,减缓强太阳辐射伤害;两种杂交杨用于光化学能量分配的比例P64大于Jia,而P_n值在强辐射阶段和全天平均值、累积值均出现Jia>P64.结果证明,仅通过杂交杨本身叶绿体对光的荧光特性反应计算接收到的光能中有多少能量被利用与实际植物光合速率的转化的干物质存在一定的差异,两种杂交杨光化学实际固定碳和转化光能的多少的内在关系需进一步的研究.
比較研究瞭伊犛地區兩種雜交楊伊犛楊1號(Populus deltaiids 'CV-64'(P64))和伊犛楊小葉楊(P.simonii canadenxp.russkii-9(Jia))對太暘輻射光能的利用和耗散特性.兩種雜交楊光閤速率(P_n)的日變化均呈現雙峰型,高光量子通量密度(PFD)階段P_n達到20.1%的差距;實際最大光化學猝滅ФPSII日變化均呈"U"型,于16:30時,P64的ФPSII達到最低值,而Jia的值于14:30時達到最低(Jia>P64);光閤繫統的閉閤程度(L)在14:30時均齣現一箇短暫迴落,全天平均閉閤程度無顯著差異(p>0.05).非光化學猝滅繫數(NPQ)在16:30M時達到最大值(Jia>P64),兩者NPQ全天相差31.7%.葉片轉化吸收太暘能熱能耗散(E,D)和光化學反應轉化的光能量(E.P)進行估算錶明:在PFD較低的環境條件下,兩種雜交楊將吸收的光能50%以上用于光化學猝滅;在PFD較高的環境條件下,P64的E.P值比例大于Jia.兩者全天的E.P值沒有太大的差異,P64的E.D值顯著大于Jia的E.D值(P>0.01),而P64的E.D值佔全天轉化能量的比例小于Jia.P64和Jia的E.P達到最大的估算值時,其E.D也達到瞭最大.分析結果錶明:兩種雜交楊對高光能形成不同的適應機製,P64利用更多的太暘能進行光化學猝滅反應,而Jia利用更多的太暘能進行非光化學猝滅反應,減緩彊太暘輻射傷害;兩種雜交楊用于光化學能量分配的比例P64大于Jia,而P_n值在彊輻射階段和全天平均值、纍積值均齣現Jia>P64.結果證明,僅通過雜交楊本身葉綠體對光的熒光特性反應計算接收到的光能中有多少能量被利用與實際植物光閤速率的轉化的榦物質存在一定的差異,兩種雜交楊光化學實際固定碳和轉化光能的多少的內在關繫需進一步的研究.
비교연구료이리지구량충잡교양이리양1호(Populus deltaiids 'CV-64'(P64))화이리양소협양(P.simonii canadenxp.russkii-9(Jia))대태양복사광능적이용화모산특성.량충잡교양광합속솔(P_n)적일변화균정현쌍봉형,고광양자통량밀도(PFD)계단P_n체도20.1%적차거;실제최대광화학졸멸ФPSII일변화균정"U"형,우16:30시,P64적ФPSII체도최저치,이Jia적치우14:30시체도최저(Jia>P64);광합계통적폐합정도(L)재14:30시균출현일개단잠회락,전천평균폐합정도무현저차이(p>0.05).비광화학졸멸계수(NPQ)재16:30M시체도최대치(Jia>P64),량자NPQ전천상차31.7%.협편전화흡수태양능열능모산(E,D)화광화학반응전화적광능량(E.P)진행고산표명:재PFD교저적배경조건하,량충잡교양장흡수적광능50%이상용우광화학졸멸;재PFD교고적배경조건하,P64적E.P치비례대우Jia.량자전천적E.P치몰유태대적차이,P64적E.D치현저대우Jia적E.D치(P>0.01),이P64적E.D치점전천전화능량적비례소우Jia.P64화Jia적E.P체도최대적고산치시,기E.D야체도료최대.분석결과표명:량충잡교양대고광능형성불동적괄응궤제,P64이용경다적태양능진행광화학졸멸반응,이Jia이용경다적태양능진행비광화학졸멸반응,감완강태양복사상해;량충잡교양용우광화학능량분배적비례P64대우Jia,이P_n치재강복사계단화전천평균치、루적치균출현Jia>P64.결과증명,부통과잡교양본신협록체대광적형광특성반응계산접수도적광능중유다소능량피이용여실제식물광합속솔적전화적간물질존재일정적차이,량충잡교양광화학실제고정탄화전화광능적다소적내재관계수진일보적연구.
Aims Our objective was to study two widely planted hybrid poplars, Populus deltoids 'cv-64' (P64) and P. simonii canaden×P. russkii-9 (Jia), to explore their growth mechanisms and the solar energy utilization by photosystem II (PSII) antennae to thermal energy dissipation and photosyn-thetic electron transport characteristics during long-term adaptation to the ambient environment. Methods We studied energy utilization by computing chlorophyll fluorescence parameters and photosynthesis. Plants were grown at the Plain Forest Farm Nursery of the State Forestry Bureau of Ili Autonomous Prefecture in China's Xinjiang region.Important findings The diurnal changes of net photosynthesis (P_n) were bimodal and had a 20.1% gap under high photon flux density (PFD). The actual efficiency of open PSII centers (ΦPSII) were all of the "U" type, and their average values were equal. The ΦPSII of P64 and Jia reached the minimum value at 16:30 and 14:30, respectively. The closure value had one wave hollow at 14:30, and there was no significant difference (p>0.05) in whole-day average values. The non-photochemical quenching coefficients (NPQ) all achieved the maximum value at 16:30. Jia's NPQ maximum was less than that of P64, and the whole-day NPQ difference reached 31.7%. The estimated rates of photochemistry (E.P) and non-photochemistry (E.D) showed that under the lower PFD the poplars used more than 50% of the absorbed solar energy for the photochemical quenching, and under high PFD the absorbed solar energy for P64 for the photochemical quenching is greater than the proportion for Jia, while the absorbed solar energy for P64 for heat dissipation is less than the proportion for Jia. The E.P had no difference and reached the maximum estimated value when its E.D reached the maximum. P64 tended to use more absorbed solar energy for photochemical quenching, but Jia tended to use more solar energy for non-photochemical quenching. The cumulative values and average values of the P_n for Jia were much larger than values for P64, but the absorbed solar energy of P64 is greater than the proportion of Jia for the photochemical quenching. These results prove that it is inadequate to calculate the absorbed energy only by the chloroplast fluorescent characteristics of light received.