中华医院管理杂志
中華醫院管理雜誌
중화의원관리잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL ADMINISTRATION
2010年
6期
440-444
,共5页
医务人员%患者%医疗检查%合理性
醫務人員%患者%醫療檢查%閤理性
의무인원%환자%의료검사%합이성
Medical staff%Patients%Medical examinations%Rationality
目的 了解医患双方对医疗检查合理性的认知,为有效开展医疗检查工作提供参考.方法 采取方便抽样和个别访谈,调查了58名医务人员和329例患者对合理医疗检查内涵和意义、影响医疗检查选择因素以及不合理医疗检查原因等问题的认知情况.结果 不同部门和职称医务人员的认知差异无统计学意义,P>0.05;而门诊与住院患者以及不同性别患者之间存在相当大的认知差异,医患双方的认知差异明显,P<0.05.结论 患者应该是医疗检查合理性的评价者,患者的利益应该是医疗检查合理性评价的核心内容.只有客观评价和正确处理医患双方对医疗检查的认知差异,才能保障医疗检查的合理使用.
目的 瞭解醫患雙方對醫療檢查閤理性的認知,為有效開展醫療檢查工作提供參攷.方法 採取方便抽樣和箇彆訪談,調查瞭58名醫務人員和329例患者對閤理醫療檢查內涵和意義、影響醫療檢查選擇因素以及不閤理醫療檢查原因等問題的認知情況.結果 不同部門和職稱醫務人員的認知差異無統計學意義,P>0.05;而門診與住院患者以及不同性彆患者之間存在相噹大的認知差異,醫患雙方的認知差異明顯,P<0.05.結論 患者應該是醫療檢查閤理性的評價者,患者的利益應該是醫療檢查閤理性評價的覈心內容.隻有客觀評價和正確處理醫患雙方對醫療檢查的認知差異,纔能保障醫療檢查的閤理使用.
목적 료해의환쌍방대의료검사합이성적인지,위유효개전의료검사공작제공삼고.방법 채취방편추양화개별방담,조사료58명의무인원화329례환자대합리의료검사내함화의의、영향의료검사선택인소이급불합리의료검사원인등문제적인지정황.결과 불동부문화직칭의무인원적인지차이무통계학의의,P>0.05;이문진여주원환자이급불동성별환자지간존재상당대적인지차이,의환쌍방적인지차이명현,P<0.05.결론 환자응해시의료검사합이성적평개자,환자적이익응해시의료검사합이성평개적핵심내용.지유객관평개화정학처리의환쌍방대의료검사적인지차이,재능보장의료검사적합리사용.
Objective To leam how the doctors and patients perceive whether the medical examinations made are rational and to use this finding as a reference for medical examinations provision. Methods By way of convenience sampling and individual interviews, 58 medical staff and 329 patients were surveyed to find their perception of the contents and meaning of rational medical examinations, the factors affecting choices of medical examinations, and the causes of unreasonable medical examinations. Results Differences of perception by medical staff from different departments and academic titles are not statically significant as P>0. 05; a huge gap exists between the perception of outpatients and inpatients, as well as between patients of different genders. The most obvious gap is found between doctors and patients, as P<0. 05; Conclusions Patients ought to be the one to decide whether the medical examinations provided to them are rational, and their rights and interests ought to be the key criterion for the rationality evaluation of medical examinations. Objective evaluation and correct coping style to the different perceptions of medical examinations by doctors and patients will guarantee reasonable choices of medical examinations.