CAJ | 학술논문

目的探讨阴攀中部无针麻醉袖套式包皮环切治疗包皮过长的效果.方法选择包皮过长患者105例,随机分成A,B两组,A组40例,行阴茎中部无针麻醉袖套式包皮环切术,8组40例行传统阻滞麻醉及背侧切开环切术.对两组在麻醉剂量、起效时间、视觉模拟麻醉疼痛评分、出血量、水肿、切口愈合、外观满意度等方面进行比较.结果两组所有对比项目在两组之间的差异均有统计学意义.结论阴茎中部无针麻醉袖套式包皮切除治疗包皮过长比传统阻滞麻醉及背侧切开环切术更具有优越性,值得临床推广.
목적 탐토음반중부무침마취수투식포피배절치료포피과장적효과.방법 선택포피과장환자105례,수궤분성A,B량조,A조40례,행음경중부무침마취수투식포피배절술,8조40례행전통조체마취급배측절개배절술.대량조재마취제량、기효시간、시각모의마취동통평분、출혈량、수종、절구유합、외관만의도등방면진행비교.결과량조소유대비항목재량조지간적차이균유통계학의의.결론 음경중부무침마취수투식포피절제치료포피과장비전통조체마취급배측절개배절술경구유우월성,치득림상추엄.
Objectives To investigate mid-penis sleeve circumcision with needle-free jet anaesthesia for the treatment of patients with redundant prepuce and observe the therapeutic effect.Methods Methods outpatient circumcision 80 cases with DPNB(dorsal of penis nerve blocked)anaesthesia were randomly divided into two groups,group A(40 cases)was underwent mid-penis sleeve circumcision with needle-free jet anaesthesia,group B(40cases)was done dorsal slit circumcision with traditional DPNB,to study the difference in Anaesthetic Volume,the time of take effect,visual analogue scale(VAS),bleeding voluroue,the condition of foreskin hydropsia,operative incision healing.appearance satisfication percentage.Results Group A has statistical difference to Group B in all ahove mentioned index.Conclusions Mid-penis sleeve circumcision with needle-free jet anaesthesia has many advantages over the dorsal slit circumcision with traditional DPNB,deserving generally clinical application.