CAJ | 학술논문

从德日刑法理论和司法判例的角度看，不真正不作为犯的故意中的认识要素和意志要素不仅应当存在，而且应当具备独自的内涵。不真正不作为的直接故意是指，行为人明知构成要件事实必然发生，且认识到自己居于保证人地位、保证人义务，在待修复的法益对不作为人具有高度的依赖性，行为人不作为甚至排除他人介入的可能；相反，行为人明知或预见到了构成要件事实的发生的可能性，且待修复的法益对不作为人不具有高度依赖性，行为人放任构成要件事实的发生，就是间接故意。
종덕일형법이론화사법판례적각도간，불진정불작위범적고의중적인식요소화의지요소불부응당존재，이차응당구비독자적내함。불진정불작위적직접고의시지，행위인명지구성요건사실필연발생，차인식도자기거우보증인지위、보증인의무，재대수복적법익대불작위인구유고도적의뢰성，행위인불작위심지배제타인개입적가능；상반，행위인명지혹예견도료구성요건사실적발생적가능성，차대수복적법익대불작위인불구유고도의뢰성，행위인방임구성요건사실적발생，취시간접고의。
Viewed from the perspective of German/Japanese penal code and judicial precedent, the cognitive element and will element should not only exist in non-typical omission crimes, but also have their own content. Direct intent of non-typical omission refers to the possible omission of an actor and his/her exclusion of others＇ intervention, when the actor knows facts of constitutive elements must happen and is aware that he/she assumes the guarantor status and responsibility and the potential legal interest is highly dependent on the omission actor. On the contrary, when the actor knows or foresees facts of constitutive elements might happen and the potential legal interest doesn＇t depend on the omission actor, the actor＇s omission is indirect intent.