CAJ | 학술논문

目的:观察温针灸治疗慢性腹泻的临床疗效.方法:将慢性腹泻患者200例,随机分为治疗组与对照组,治疗组100例采用温针灸特定穴治疗;对照组100例采用口服思密达治疗.结果:治疗组痊愈52例,显效34例,好转14例,总有效率为100.0%;对照组痊愈5例,显效23例,好转33例,无效39例,总有效率为61.0%.两组总有效率比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论:温针灸特定穴治疗慢性腹泻疗效优于口服思密达治疗.
목적:관찰온침구치료만성복사적림상료효.방법:장만성복사환자200례,수궤분위치료조여대조조,치료조100례채용온침구특정혈치료;대조조100례채용구복사밀체치료.결과:치료조전유52례,현효34례,호전14례,총유효솔위100.0%;대조조전유5례,현효23례,호전33례,무효39례,총유효솔위61.0%.량조총유효솔비교차이구유통계학의의(P<0.05).결론:온침구특정혈치료만성복사료효우우구복사밀체치료.
Objective: To observe the therapeutic effects of needle warming moxibustion for chronic diarrhea. Methods: Two-hundred cases with chronic diarrhea were divided randomly into a treatment group and a control group. 100 cases in the treatment group were treated with needle warming moxibustion on specific acupoints. 100 cases in the control group were treated by oral administration of Smecta. Results: The therapeutic results showed cure in 52 cases, remarkable effect in 34 cases, improvement in 14 cases and the total effective rate in 100.0% in the treatment group, and cure in 5 cases, remarkable effect in 23 cases, improvement in 33 cases, failure in 39 cases and the total effective rate in 61.0% in the control group. The comparison of the total effective rate between the two groups was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion: The needle warming moxibustion on specific acupoints is better than oral administration of Smecta in the therapeutic effects.