CAJ | 학술논문

目的对比分析睫状肌麻痹前后综合验光仪主觉验光和常规主觉插片屈光度的差异变化,探讨科学规范的验光方法.方法选取2009年8月行屈光检查的近视患者108例,年龄17～28岁,睫状肌麻痹前后用电脑验光仪或检影镜进行客观验光,然后在此基础上进行综合验光仪主觉验光和常规主觉插片.将检测结果用统计软件SPSS11.0进行统计学分析.结果综合验光仪主觉验光球镜和柱镜度数在睫状肌麻痹前后变化不大,差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05).而常规验光球镜度数睫状肌麻痹前后差异有统计学意义(P＜0.01).柱镜度数散瞳前后差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05).结论对于成人屈光不正患者,规范科学的综合验光仪主觉验光无需散瞳松弛睫状肌即可获得准确的屈光不正度数,是一种简便准确可靠的验光方法.
목적 대비분석첩상기마비전후종합험광의주각험광화상규주각삽편굴광도적차이변화,탐토과학규범적험광방법.방법 선취2009년8월행굴광검사적근시환자108례,년령17～28세,첩상기마비전후용전뇌험광의혹검영경진행객관험광,연후재차기출상진행종합험광의주각험광화상규주각삽편.장검측결과용통계연건SPSS11.0진행통계학분석.결과 종합험광의주각험광구경화주경도수재첩상기마비전후변화불대,차이무통계학의의(P＞0.05).이상규험광구경도수첩상기마비전후차이유통계학의의(P＜0.01).주경도수산동전후차이무통계학의의(P＞0.05).결론 대우성인굴광불정환자,규범과학적종합험광의주각험광무수산동송이첩상기즉가획득준학적굴광불정도수,시일충간편준학가고적험광방법.
Objective To investigate a scientific and normative optometry by comparatively analyzing the differences of refractory between subjective optometry by compositive eye refractometer and common optometry before and after cycloplegia. Methods A total of 108 myopia patients, who were taking refractory examination aged from 17 to 28 years old, were enrolled from our department in August 2009. All patients were taking objective optometry by computer eye refractometer or ophthalmoscope before and after cycloplegia, and then operated with subjective optometry by compositive eye refractometer and common optometry. The data were taken with statistical analysis by SPSS 11.0. Results Subjective optometry by compositive eye refractometer showed no difference between spheral lens degree and cylindrical lens degree before and after cyclop1egia (both P＞0.05), but there was statistical difference in spheral lens degree by common optometry between before and after cycloplegia (P＜0.01). No difference was found in cylindrical lens degree between before and after mydriasis (P ＞0.05). Conclusions For adult patients with ametropia, scientific and normative compositive eye refractometer is a simple, reliable and accurate way for optometry. It can help patients to get correct ametropia without mydriasis and relaxing ciliary muscle.