南方医科大学学报
南方醫科大學學報
남방의과대학학보
JOURNAL OF SOUTHERN MEDICAL UNIVERSITY
2010年
1期
163-165
,共3页
温丽丽%林文前%招伟贤%李国才%白晓晖%肖建斌
溫麗麗%林文前%招偉賢%李國纔%白曉暉%肖建斌
온려려%림문전%초위현%리국재%백효휘%초건빈
顺式阿曲库铵%七氟烷%丙泊酚%瑞芬太尼%输注%神经肌肉阻滞
順式阿麯庫銨%七氟烷%丙泊酚%瑞芬太尼%輸註%神經肌肉阻滯
순식아곡고안%칠불완%병박분%서분태니%수주%신경기육조체
cisatracurium%sevoflurane%propofol%remifentanil%infusion%neuromuscular blockade
目的 比较七氟烷吸入麻醉与丙泊酚-瑞芬太尼全凭静脉麻醉对持续输注顺式阿曲库铵肌松效应的影响.方法 选择全麻下手术病人40例,随机分为七氟烷吸入麻醉组(Ⅰ组)和丙泊酚-瑞芬太尼组(Ⅱ组),各20例.静脉注射顺式阿曲库铵0.15 mg/kg后气管插管,术中持续输注顺式阿曲库铵,调节输注速率维持T1≤5%.记录顺式阿曲库铵输注速率、3 h时用药量,恢复指数、停药至TOF比值为0.9的时间.结果 与初始输注速率比较,两组持续给药30~180min期间顺式阿曲库铵输注速率下降(P<0.05),且Ⅰ组输注速率显著低于Ⅱ组,总体平均输注速率较Ⅱ组减少28%.但120min后两组输注速率无明显变化.两组恢复指数、停药到TOF比值为0.9的时间差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 持续输注顺式阿曲库铵维持恒定肌松水平,七氟烷麻醉与丙泊酚-瑞芬太尼全凭静脉麻醉均能呈时间依赖性增强其肌松作用,输注120min时达最大程度,且前者的增强效应大于后者,但对肌松恢复的影响无明显差别.
目的 比較七氟烷吸入痳醉與丙泊酚-瑞芬太尼全憑靜脈痳醉對持續輸註順式阿麯庫銨肌鬆效應的影響.方法 選擇全痳下手術病人40例,隨機分為七氟烷吸入痳醉組(Ⅰ組)和丙泊酚-瑞芬太尼組(Ⅱ組),各20例.靜脈註射順式阿麯庫銨0.15 mg/kg後氣管插管,術中持續輸註順式阿麯庫銨,調節輸註速率維持T1≤5%.記錄順式阿麯庫銨輸註速率、3 h時用藥量,恢複指數、停藥至TOF比值為0.9的時間.結果 與初始輸註速率比較,兩組持續給藥30~180min期間順式阿麯庫銨輸註速率下降(P<0.05),且Ⅰ組輸註速率顯著低于Ⅱ組,總體平均輸註速率較Ⅱ組減少28%.但120min後兩組輸註速率無明顯變化.兩組恢複指數、停藥到TOF比值為0.9的時間差異均無統計學意義(P>0.05).結論 持續輸註順式阿麯庫銨維持恆定肌鬆水平,七氟烷痳醉與丙泊酚-瑞芬太尼全憑靜脈痳醉均能呈時間依賴性增彊其肌鬆作用,輸註120min時達最大程度,且前者的增彊效應大于後者,但對肌鬆恢複的影響無明顯差彆.
목적 비교칠불완흡입마취여병박분-서분태니전빙정맥마취대지속수주순식아곡고안기송효응적영향.방법 선택전마하수술병인40례,수궤분위칠불완흡입마취조(Ⅰ조)화병박분-서분태니조(Ⅱ조),각20례.정맥주사순식아곡고안0.15 mg/kg후기관삽관,술중지속수주순식아곡고안,조절수주속솔유지T1≤5%.기록순식아곡고안수주속솔、3 h시용약량,회복지수、정약지TOF비치위0.9적시간.결과 여초시수주속솔비교,량조지속급약30~180min기간순식아곡고안수주속솔하강(P<0.05),차Ⅰ조수주속솔현저저우Ⅱ조,총체평균수주속솔교Ⅱ조감소28%.단120min후량조수주속솔무명현변화.량조회복지수、정약도TOF비치위0.9적시간차이균무통계학의의(P>0.05).결론 지속수주순식아곡고안유지항정기송수평,칠불완마취여병박분-서분태니전빙정맥마취균능정시간의뢰성증강기기송작용,수주120min시체최대정도,차전자적증강효응대우후자,단대기송회복적영향무명현차별.
Objective To compare the effects of sevoflurane and propofol-remifentanil anesthesia on neuromuscular blockade produced by continuous cisatracurium infusion. Methods Forty ASA Ⅰ or Ⅱ patients undergoing selective surgery were randomly divided into sevoflurane and propofol-remifentanil anesthesia groups (n=20). Neuromuscular blockade was monitored using train-of-four (TOF) stimulation by recording the contraction force of the adductor poUicis muscle with a muscle relaxation monitor. A bolus dose of cisatracurium of 0.15 mg/kg was administered to facilitate endotracheal intubation, followed by continuous infusion adjusted manually to maintain the first twitch (T1) ≤ 5% of the control level. The following variables were recorded including the infusion rate, total amount of cisatracurium, spontaneous recovery index (RI), and the time interval from termination of infusion cisatracurium to recovery of TOF ratio (TOFR) to 0.9. Results With the maintenance of a 95%-99% neuromuscular blockade, the infusion rate was significantly lower in sevoflurane group than in propofol-remifentanil group (P<0.05), and stabilized in both groups after 120 min. No significant differences were found in RI or the time to TOFR of 0.9 between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion During the maintenance of stable neuromuscular blockade by continuous cisatracurium infusion, both sevoflurane and propofol-remifentanil anesthesia can time-dependently enhance the effect of cisatracurium without producing significant differences in the recovery properties.