国际呼吸杂志
國際呼吸雜誌
국제호흡잡지
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESPIRATION
2012年
15期
1168-1172
,共5页
肺泡蛋白沉积症%振动反应成像%呼吸音
肺泡蛋白沉積癥%振動反應成像%呼吸音
폐포단백침적증%진동반응성상%호흡음
Pulmonary alveolar proteinosis%Vibration response imaging%Respiratory sounds
目的 初步探讨通过肺部振动反应成像(VRI)系统记录的肺泡蛋白沉积症(PAP)患者肺部振动反应图像特点.方法 选择2010年7月至2011年4月期间在北京协和医院呼吸科住院治疗的PAP患者12例行VRI检查,并收集患者临床资料.其中8例患者经全肺灌洗治疗,分别记录其全肺灌洗前后VRI图像特点.同时招募33名健康成年人作为健康对照组.统计学方法采用T检验、非参数检验及线性回归分析.结果 PAP患者VRI检查振动曲线评分0.50(0.00~2.75),动态图像发展评分1.50(1.00~2.00),最大振动能量图(MEF)评分3.00(1.25~3.75),右肺QLD值(46.67±8.52)%;健康对照组振动曲线评分0.00(0.00~1.00),动态图像发展评分0.00(0.00~1.00),MEF评分1.00(0.00~1.50),右肺QLD值(43.30±6.02)%,其中动态图像评分与MEF评分两组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),而振动曲线评分及右肺QLD值两组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).8例行全肺灌洗治疗患者,治疗前振动曲线评分1.50(0.00~3.50),动态图像发展评分1.50(1.00~2.00),MEF评分3.00(1.25~4.75),干湿啰音评分1.00(0.25~1.00),MEF面积(68.62±4.59)千像素,图像总评价6.00(4.25~9.00);治疗后振动曲线评分0.50(0.00~1.75),动态图像发展评分1.00(1.00~1.00),MEF评分1.00(0.00~1.75),干湿啰音评分0.50(0.00~1.00),MEF面积(71.66±6.03)千像素,图像总评分3.00(2.00~3.75),其中MEF评分、图像总评分有显著改善(P<0.05),MEF面积显著增大(P<0.05),而振动曲线评分、动态图像发展评分以及于湿啰音评分无显著改善(P>0.05).治疗前后氧合指数的改善与MEF评分、图像总评分以及MEF面积变化之间无线性相关关系.结论 PAP患者经肺泡灌洗后MEF面积显著增大,MEF形态显著改善,今后可望将VRI检查用于PAP患者的随访.
目的 初步探討通過肺部振動反應成像(VRI)繫統記錄的肺泡蛋白沉積癥(PAP)患者肺部振動反應圖像特點.方法 選擇2010年7月至2011年4月期間在北京協和醫院呼吸科住院治療的PAP患者12例行VRI檢查,併收集患者臨床資料.其中8例患者經全肺灌洗治療,分彆記錄其全肺灌洗前後VRI圖像特點.同時招募33名健康成年人作為健康對照組.統計學方法採用T檢驗、非參數檢驗及線性迴歸分析.結果 PAP患者VRI檢查振動麯線評分0.50(0.00~2.75),動態圖像髮展評分1.50(1.00~2.00),最大振動能量圖(MEF)評分3.00(1.25~3.75),右肺QLD值(46.67±8.52)%;健康對照組振動麯線評分0.00(0.00~1.00),動態圖像髮展評分0.00(0.00~1.00),MEF評分1.00(0.00~1.50),右肺QLD值(43.30±6.02)%,其中動態圖像評分與MEF評分兩組間差異有統計學意義(P<0.05),而振動麯線評分及右肺QLD值兩組間差異無統計學意義(P>0.05).8例行全肺灌洗治療患者,治療前振動麯線評分1.50(0.00~3.50),動態圖像髮展評分1.50(1.00~2.00),MEF評分3.00(1.25~4.75),榦濕啰音評分1.00(0.25~1.00),MEF麵積(68.62±4.59)韆像素,圖像總評價6.00(4.25~9.00);治療後振動麯線評分0.50(0.00~1.75),動態圖像髮展評分1.00(1.00~1.00),MEF評分1.00(0.00~1.75),榦濕啰音評分0.50(0.00~1.00),MEF麵積(71.66±6.03)韆像素,圖像總評分3.00(2.00~3.75),其中MEF評分、圖像總評分有顯著改善(P<0.05),MEF麵積顯著增大(P<0.05),而振動麯線評分、動態圖像髮展評分以及于濕啰音評分無顯著改善(P>0.05).治療前後氧閤指數的改善與MEF評分、圖像總評分以及MEF麵積變化之間無線性相關關繫.結論 PAP患者經肺泡灌洗後MEF麵積顯著增大,MEF形態顯著改善,今後可望將VRI檢查用于PAP患者的隨訪.
목적 초보탐토통과폐부진동반응성상(VRI)계통기록적폐포단백침적증(PAP)환자폐부진동반응도상특점.방법 선택2010년7월지2011년4월기간재북경협화의원호흡과주원치료적PAP환자12례행VRI검사,병수집환자림상자료.기중8례환자경전폐관세치료,분별기록기전폐관세전후VRI도상특점.동시초모33명건강성년인작위건강대조조.통계학방법채용T검험、비삼수검험급선성회귀분석.결과 PAP환자VRI검사진동곡선평분0.50(0.00~2.75),동태도상발전평분1.50(1.00~2.00),최대진동능량도(MEF)평분3.00(1.25~3.75),우폐QLD치(46.67±8.52)%;건강대조조진동곡선평분0.00(0.00~1.00),동태도상발전평분0.00(0.00~1.00),MEF평분1.00(0.00~1.50),우폐QLD치(43.30±6.02)%,기중동태도상평분여MEF평분량조간차이유통계학의의(P<0.05),이진동곡선평분급우폐QLD치량조간차이무통계학의의(P>0.05).8례행전폐관세치료환자,치료전진동곡선평분1.50(0.00~3.50),동태도상발전평분1.50(1.00~2.00),MEF평분3.00(1.25~4.75),간습라음평분1.00(0.25~1.00),MEF면적(68.62±4.59)천상소,도상총평개6.00(4.25~9.00);치료후진동곡선평분0.50(0.00~1.75),동태도상발전평분1.00(1.00~1.00),MEF평분1.00(0.00~1.75),간습라음평분0.50(0.00~1.00),MEF면적(71.66±6.03)천상소,도상총평분3.00(2.00~3.75),기중MEF평분、도상총평분유현저개선(P<0.05),MEF면적현저증대(P<0.05),이진동곡선평분、동태도상발전평분이급우습라음평분무현저개선(P>0.05).치료전후양합지수적개선여MEF평분、도상총평분이급MEF면적변화지간무선성상관관계.결론 PAP환자경폐포관세후MEF면적현저증대,MEF형태현저개선,금후가망장VRI검사용우PAP환자적수방.
Objective To describe the characters of vibration response imaging (VRI) in patients with pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (PAP).Methods 12 PAP patients and 33 healthy volunteers were enrolled.Both clinical examination and VRI test were performed.Parameters of VRI were measured,including vibration energy graph grades,dynamic image grades,areas of maximal energy frame (MEF),quantitative lung data (QLD) and rales.Eight PAP patients were treated by whole-lung lavage.The changes of above parameters were compared.The statistical analysis was performed using T test,nonparametric test and linear regression.Results The VRI parameters of the PAP group were as follows:graph grades 0.50(0.00~ 2.75),dynamic image grades 1.50 ( 1.00 ~ 2.00),MEF grades 3.00 ( 1.25 ~3.75),QLD (46.67±8.52)%(right).The VRI parameters of the control group were as follows:graph grades 0.00(0.00 ~ 1.00 ),dynamic image grades 0.00 ( 0.00 ~ 1.00 ),MEF grades 1.00 ( 0.00 ~ 1.50 ),QLD (43.30±6.02)% (right).There was significant difference between the two groups in dynamic image grades and MEF grades ( P <0.05),no significant difference was shown in graph grades and QLD.Eight PAP patients accepted the whole-lung lavage treatment.Before treantment,the patients' VR1 parameters were as follows:graph grades 1.50(0.00~3.50),dynamic image grades 1.50( 1.00~2.00),MEF grades 3.00(1.25~4.75),rale grades 1.00(0.25~1.00),MEF areas (68.62±4.59) kilo-pixels and the whole grades of image 6.00(4.25 ~ 9.00).After lavage treatment,these parameters were as follows:graph grades 0.50 (0.00 ~ 1.75),dynamic image grades 1.00 ( 1.00 ~ 1.00),MEF grades 1.00 (0.00 ~ 1.75),rale grades 0.50(0.00 ~ 1.00),MEF areas ( 71.66 ± 6.03) kilo-pixels,the whole grades of image 3.00 (2.00~3.75).There were significant differences in MEF grades,MEF areas and the whole grades of image ( P <0.05),otherwise graph grades,dynamic image grades and rale grades were not.After treatment,there was no linear correlation between the improvement in oxygenation index and VRI image grades' changes.Conclusions PAP patients' MEF areas become larger,MEF appearances are better after the whole-lung lavage treatment.VRI will be used in following up PAP patients.