心血管康复医学杂志
心血管康複醫學雜誌
심혈관강복의학잡지
JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR REHABILITATION MEDICINE
2012年
3期
221-225
,共5页
李明娥%霍红梅%王梅林%许红梅%马敬霞
李明娥%霍紅梅%王梅林%許紅梅%馬敬霞
리명아%곽홍매%왕매림%허홍매%마경하
心力衰竭,充血性%运动%康复护理%老年人
心力衰竭,充血性%運動%康複護理%老年人
심력쇠갈,충혈성%운동%강복호리%노년인
Heart failure,congestive%Exercise%Rehabilitation nursing%The aged
目的:探讨老年慢性心衰患者实施运动康复的安全性及效果.方法:83例老年慢性心衰患者被随机分为常规护理组(41例,常规护理)和运动康复组(42例,在常规护理基础上接受运动训练).疗程均为8周,随访12个月.患者心功能以纽约心脏病协会(NYHA)分级表示,以超声心动图测定左室射血分数(LVEF)和左室舒张末期内径(LVEDd),同时测定6min步行距离(6MWD),血浆脑钠肽(BNP)水平,代谢当量(METs),明尼苏达心力衰竭生活质量量表(MLHFQ)评分表示健康相关生活质量,记录12个月内的再入院率和死亡率.结果:两组治疗8周时LVEF、LVEDd、NYHA分级均显著改善(P均<0.05),且与常规护理组相比,运动康复组LVEF[ (54.7±6.2)%比(65.4±8.7)%]、LVEDd[(49.6±8.3) mm比(40.2±9.3) mm]、NYHA分级[(2.7±0.8)级比(1.9±0.9)级]改善更显著(P<0.05); 6MWD[ (122.7±9.2)m比(175.6±8.7)m]和METs[(5.8±1.8)比(8.4±2.4)]也明显增加(P<0.01),血浆BNP水平[(43.4±9.8)pg/ml比(31.7±8.9) pg/ml]明显降低(P<0.05);运动康复组康复训练中未发生严重不良事件.12个月时,运动康复组MLHFO评分明显高于常规护理组[(68.9±7.9)分比(45.6±8.2)分,P<0.05],因心衰再入院率明显低于常规护理组(9.5%比24.4%,P<0.05).结论:对老年慢性心衰患者实施运动康复安全有效,可明显改善心功能,增强运动耐力,提高生活质量.
目的:探討老年慢性心衰患者實施運動康複的安全性及效果.方法:83例老年慢性心衰患者被隨機分為常規護理組(41例,常規護理)和運動康複組(42例,在常規護理基礎上接受運動訓練).療程均為8週,隨訪12箇月.患者心功能以紐約心髒病協會(NYHA)分級錶示,以超聲心動圖測定左室射血分數(LVEF)和左室舒張末期內徑(LVEDd),同時測定6min步行距離(6MWD),血漿腦鈉肽(BNP)水平,代謝噹量(METs),明尼囌達心力衰竭生活質量量錶(MLHFQ)評分錶示健康相關生活質量,記錄12箇月內的再入院率和死亡率.結果:兩組治療8週時LVEF、LVEDd、NYHA分級均顯著改善(P均<0.05),且與常規護理組相比,運動康複組LVEF[ (54.7±6.2)%比(65.4±8.7)%]、LVEDd[(49.6±8.3) mm比(40.2±9.3) mm]、NYHA分級[(2.7±0.8)級比(1.9±0.9)級]改善更顯著(P<0.05); 6MWD[ (122.7±9.2)m比(175.6±8.7)m]和METs[(5.8±1.8)比(8.4±2.4)]也明顯增加(P<0.01),血漿BNP水平[(43.4±9.8)pg/ml比(31.7±8.9) pg/ml]明顯降低(P<0.05);運動康複組康複訓練中未髮生嚴重不良事件.12箇月時,運動康複組MLHFO評分明顯高于常規護理組[(68.9±7.9)分比(45.6±8.2)分,P<0.05],因心衰再入院率明顯低于常規護理組(9.5%比24.4%,P<0.05).結論:對老年慢性心衰患者實施運動康複安全有效,可明顯改善心功能,增彊運動耐力,提高生活質量.
목적:탐토노년만성심쇠환자실시운동강복적안전성급효과.방법:83례노년만성심쇠환자피수궤분위상규호리조(41례,상규호리)화운동강복조(42례,재상규호리기출상접수운동훈련).료정균위8주,수방12개월.환자심공능이뉴약심장병협회(NYHA)분급표시,이초성심동도측정좌실사혈분수(LVEF)화좌실서장말기내경(LVEDd),동시측정6min보행거리(6MWD),혈장뇌납태(BNP)수평,대사당량(METs),명니소체심력쇠갈생활질량량표(MLHFQ)평분표시건강상관생활질량,기록12개월내적재입원솔화사망솔.결과:량조치료8주시LVEF、LVEDd、NYHA분급균현저개선(P균<0.05),차여상규호리조상비,운동강복조LVEF[ (54.7±6.2)%비(65.4±8.7)%]、LVEDd[(49.6±8.3) mm비(40.2±9.3) mm]、NYHA분급[(2.7±0.8)급비(1.9±0.9)급]개선경현저(P<0.05); 6MWD[ (122.7±9.2)m비(175.6±8.7)m]화METs[(5.8±1.8)비(8.4±2.4)]야명현증가(P<0.01),혈장BNP수평[(43.4±9.8)pg/ml비(31.7±8.9) pg/ml]명현강저(P<0.05);운동강복조강복훈련중미발생엄중불량사건.12개월시,운동강복조MLHFO평분명현고우상규호리조[(68.9±7.9)분비(45.6±8.2)분,P<0.05],인심쇠재입원솔명현저우상규호리조(9.5%비24.4%,P<0.05).결론:대노년만성심쇠환자실시운동강복안전유효,가명현개선심공능,증강운동내력,제고생활질량.
Objective:To explore safcty and effects of exercise rehabilitation in aged patients with chronic heart failure (CHF).Methods:A total of 83 aged CHF patients were randomly divided into exercise rehabilitation group (n=42,received exercise training based on usual care) and usual care group (n=41,received usual care).Period of treatment was eight weeks and patients were followed up for 12 months.New York heart association (NYHA) classification was used to represent cardiac function.Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF),left ventricular enddiastolic dimension (LVEDd) were determined by ultrasound cardiography,6min walking distance (6MWD) and oxygen metabolic equivalent (METs) also were determined,plasma level of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) was examined.Minnesota living with heart failure questionnaire (MLHFQ) was used to represent quality of life.Rehospitalization rate and mortality rate within 12 months were recorded in all patients.Results:On 8 th weeks after treatment,the LVEF,LVEDd and NYHA class of two groups all significantly improved (P<0.05 all),compared with usual care group,there were significant improvement in LVEF [ (54.7 ± 6.2)% vs.65.4 ± 8.7)%],LVEDd [ (49.6±8.3) mm vs.(40.2±9.3) mm] and NYHA class [ (2.7±0.8) classes vs.(1.9±0.9) classes],P<0.05 all; 6MWD [ (122.7±9.2) m vs.(175.6±8.7) m] and METs [ (5.8±1.8) vs.(8.4±2.4)] also significantly increased (P<0.01),and plasma level of BNP [ (43.4±9.8) pg/ml vs.(31.7±8.9) pg/ml,P<0.05] significantly decreased in exercise rehabilitation group.No severe adverse events occurred in exercise rehabilitation group.After 12 months,compared with usual care group,there were significant increase in MLHFO score [ (45.6±8.2) scores vs.(68.9 ± 7.9) scores],significant decrease in rehospitalization rate caused by heart failure (24.4 % vs.9.5 % ),P <0.05 all in exercise rehabilitation group.Conclusion:Exercise rehabilitation is safe and effective in aged patients with chronic heart failure,which can significantly improve cardiac function,enhance exercise capacity and increase quality of life.