中华老年医学杂志
中華老年醫學雜誌
중화노년의학잡지
Chinese Journal of Geriatrics
2010年
6期
492-494
,共3页
全身麻醉%乳腺肿瘤
全身痳醉%乳腺腫瘤
전신마취%유선종류
Anesthesia,general%Breast neoplasms
目的 比较ProSeal喉罩和气管导管在全身麻醉(全麻)苏醒期对老年乳腺癌根治术患者的影响.方法 美国麻醉医师学会(ASA)分级Ⅰ-Ⅱ级、择期在全麻下行乳腺癌根治术的老年女性患者30例,随机分为2组,ProSeal喉罩组(喉罩组,15例)与气管导管组(导管组,15例).全麻后喉罩组放置ProSeal喉罩,导管组为气管插管.记录两组患者入室后5min(T0)、手术结束(T1)、呼唤睁眼(T2)、拔除导管或喉罩后即刻(T3)、拔除导管或喉罩后3min(T4)时的心率、收缩压、舒张压;记录全麻苏醒期使用降压药的例数,呛咳、烦躁及拔除导管或喉罩后咽痛、恶心、呕吐发生率.结果 喉罩组在T2点血压、心率[(140.2±8.7)mm Hg、(77.1±7.4)次/min]仅轻度增高,与T0[(134.8±12.6)mm Hg、(71.5±8.8)次/min]比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);但在T3点血压、心率[(143.3±8.5)mm Hg、(81.7±6.8)次/min]升高与T0比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).导管组在T2和T3时点,血压、心率[(146.5±13.5)mm Hg、(85.7±6.6)次/min和(151.4±11.7)mm Hg、(95.3±6.8)次/min]较T0[(132.1±12.1)mm Hg、(70.3±8.0)次/min]均明显增加(P<0.05),在T3点达最高峰.在T2、T3时点,喉罩组的血压、心率增加程度明显小于导管组(P<0.05).喉罩组患者苏醒时使用降压药、呛咳、咽痛的例数明显少于导管组(P<0.05);而拔管后烦躁、恶心、呕吐等并发症发生率,两组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 老年乳腺癌根治术患者使用ProSeal喉罩,明显减少麻醉苏醒期并发症的发生,有利于老年患者的麻醉安全.
目的 比較ProSeal喉罩和氣管導管在全身痳醉(全痳)囌醒期對老年乳腺癌根治術患者的影響.方法 美國痳醉醫師學會(ASA)分級Ⅰ-Ⅱ級、擇期在全痳下行乳腺癌根治術的老年女性患者30例,隨機分為2組,ProSeal喉罩組(喉罩組,15例)與氣管導管組(導管組,15例).全痳後喉罩組放置ProSeal喉罩,導管組為氣管插管.記錄兩組患者入室後5min(T0)、手術結束(T1)、呼喚睜眼(T2)、拔除導管或喉罩後即刻(T3)、拔除導管或喉罩後3min(T4)時的心率、收縮壓、舒張壓;記錄全痳囌醒期使用降壓藥的例數,嗆咳、煩躁及拔除導管或喉罩後嚥痛、噁心、嘔吐髮生率.結果 喉罩組在T2點血壓、心率[(140.2±8.7)mm Hg、(77.1±7.4)次/min]僅輕度增高,與T0[(134.8±12.6)mm Hg、(71.5±8.8)次/min]比較差異無統計學意義(P>0.05);但在T3點血壓、心率[(143.3±8.5)mm Hg、(81.7±6.8)次/min]升高與T0比較差異有統計學意義(P<0.05).導管組在T2和T3時點,血壓、心率[(146.5±13.5)mm Hg、(85.7±6.6)次/min和(151.4±11.7)mm Hg、(95.3±6.8)次/min]較T0[(132.1±12.1)mm Hg、(70.3±8.0)次/min]均明顯增加(P<0.05),在T3點達最高峰.在T2、T3時點,喉罩組的血壓、心率增加程度明顯小于導管組(P<0.05).喉罩組患者囌醒時使用降壓藥、嗆咳、嚥痛的例數明顯少于導管組(P<0.05);而拔管後煩躁、噁心、嘔吐等併髮癥髮生率,兩組差異無統計學意義(P>0.05).結論 老年乳腺癌根治術患者使用ProSeal喉罩,明顯減少痳醉囌醒期併髮癥的髮生,有利于老年患者的痳醉安全.
목적 비교ProSeal후조화기관도관재전신마취(전마)소성기대노년유선암근치술환자적영향.방법 미국마취의사학회(ASA)분급Ⅰ-Ⅱ급、택기재전마하행유선암근치술적노년녀성환자30례,수궤분위2조,ProSeal후조조(후조조,15례)여기관도관조(도관조,15례).전마후후조조방치ProSeal후조,도관조위기관삽관.기록량조환자입실후5min(T0)、수술결속(T1)、호환정안(T2)、발제도관혹후조후즉각(T3)、발제도관혹후조후3min(T4)시적심솔、수축압、서장압;기록전마소성기사용강압약적례수,창해、번조급발제도관혹후조후인통、악심、구토발생솔.결과 후조조재T2점혈압、심솔[(140.2±8.7)mm Hg、(77.1±7.4)차/min]부경도증고,여T0[(134.8±12.6)mm Hg、(71.5±8.8)차/min]비교차이무통계학의의(P>0.05);단재T3점혈압、심솔[(143.3±8.5)mm Hg、(81.7±6.8)차/min]승고여T0비교차이유통계학의의(P<0.05).도관조재T2화T3시점,혈압、심솔[(146.5±13.5)mm Hg、(85.7±6.6)차/min화(151.4±11.7)mm Hg、(95.3±6.8)차/min]교T0[(132.1±12.1)mm Hg、(70.3±8.0)차/min]균명현증가(P<0.05),재T3점체최고봉.재T2、T3시점,후조조적혈압、심솔증가정도명현소우도관조(P<0.05).후조조환자소성시사용강압약、창해、인통적례수명현소우도관조(P<0.05);이발관후번조、악심、구토등병발증발생솔,량조차이무통계학의의(P>0.05).결론 노년유선암근치술환자사용ProSeal후조,명현감소마취소성기병발증적발생,유리우노년환자적마취안전.
Objective To explore the effect of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal tube on analepsia stage of general anesthesia in geriatric patients undergoing radical mastectomy.Methods Thirty geriatric females with breast cancer of American Standards Association (ASA)Ⅰ-Ⅱscheduled for selective radical mastectomy under general anesthesia were randomly allocated to two groups: ProSeal laryngeal mask airway group(PLMA group, n=15) and endotracheal tube group (ET group, n=15). The patients were put on PLMA or were intubated with ET under general anesthesia in the two groups, respectively. The heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure(SBP)and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were recorded at the time points of 5 min after entering operation room (T0), end of surgery (T1), opening eyes (T2), after extubation (PLMA) immediately (T3) and 3 min after extubation (PLMA) (T4). The numbers of patients who were given antihypertensive agent,showed bucking, agitation or sore throat, nausea and vomiting after extubation were recorded during the analepsia stage of general anesthesia. Results The blood pressure (BP) and HR were mildly.increased in PLMA group at T2, and there was no significant difference compared with T0(P>0.05). But the BP and HR were significantly higher at T3 than at T0 (P<0.05). In ET group, the BP and HR were both significantly elevated at T2 and T3 than at T0 (P<0.05), and reached the peak at T3. The increased levels of BP and HR were significantly lower in PLMA group than in ET group at T2 and T3 (P<0.05). The quantities of patients who were given antihypertensive agent, showed bucking and sore throat were less in PLMA group than in ET group(P<0.05). No differences in incidence rate of agitation, nausea and vomiting after extubation between the two groups were observed(P>0.05). Conclusions PLMA can obviously reduce the occurrence of complications in analepsia stage of general anesthesia in geriatric patients scheduled for selective radical mastectomy,and is beneficial to provide much safer anesthesia.