中华实验外科杂志
中華實驗外科雜誌
중화실험외과잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SURGERY
2008年
9期
1116-1118
,共3页
蒋峰%许林%陈建%丁忠海%杨民%张彤
蔣峰%許林%陳建%丁忠海%楊民%張彤
장봉%허림%진건%정충해%양민%장동
肺外科%缺血再灌注损伤%模型%动物
肺外科%缺血再灌註損傷%模型%動物
폐외과%결혈재관주손상%모형%동물
Pulmonary surgery%Ischemia-repedusion injury%Model,animal
目的 通过建立新西兰白兔肺外科单侧肺缺血-再灌注损伤动物模型,观察其缺血-再灌注损伤特点.方法 将96只健康新西兰兔随机分成3组:Ⅰ组为对照组(n=36);Ⅱ组为单纯阻断肺动脉组(n=30);Ⅲ组为阻断肺循环组(n=30).术中监测动物血流动力学指标;分别于开胸时(Ⅰ组)、缺血1小时和再灌注1、2、4、6 h(Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ组)取肺组织检测MDA;取肺组织作病理学观察,并测定手术侧肺湿/干比.结果 各组动物术中血流动力学指标平稳;在缺血1 h和再灌注1、2、4、6 h,Ⅲ组与Ⅱ组比较,肺湿/干比及肺组织中MDA含量的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),Ⅰ组与Ⅱ、Ⅲ组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).在相同的时间点,Ⅱ、Ⅲ组呈现相似的肺损伤病理改变,且较为明显的肺损伤均出现在再灌注4h,再灌注6h肺损伤均呈恢复趋势.结论 肺外科中肺动脉阻断和肺循环阻断所致肺缺血一再灌注损伤特点相似,肺外科中肺血管阻断1h是安全的.
目的 通過建立新西蘭白兔肺外科單側肺缺血-再灌註損傷動物模型,觀察其缺血-再灌註損傷特點.方法 將96隻健康新西蘭兔隨機分成3組:Ⅰ組為對照組(n=36);Ⅱ組為單純阻斷肺動脈組(n=30);Ⅲ組為阻斷肺循環組(n=30).術中鑑測動物血流動力學指標;分彆于開胸時(Ⅰ組)、缺血1小時和再灌註1、2、4、6 h(Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ組)取肺組織檢測MDA;取肺組織作病理學觀察,併測定手術側肺濕/榦比.結果 各組動物術中血流動力學指標平穩;在缺血1 h和再灌註1、2、4、6 h,Ⅲ組與Ⅱ組比較,肺濕/榦比及肺組織中MDA含量的差異均無統計學意義(P>0.05),Ⅰ組與Ⅱ、Ⅲ組比較差異有統計學意義(P<0.05).在相同的時間點,Ⅱ、Ⅲ組呈現相似的肺損傷病理改變,且較為明顯的肺損傷均齣現在再灌註4h,再灌註6h肺損傷均呈恢複趨勢.結論 肺外科中肺動脈阻斷和肺循環阻斷所緻肺缺血一再灌註損傷特點相似,肺外科中肺血管阻斷1h是安全的.
목적 통과건립신서란백토폐외과단측폐결혈-재관주손상동물모형,관찰기결혈-재관주손상특점.방법 장96지건강신서란토수궤분성3조:Ⅰ조위대조조(n=36);Ⅱ조위단순조단폐동맥조(n=30);Ⅲ조위조단폐순배조(n=30).술중감측동물혈류동역학지표;분별우개흉시(Ⅰ조)、결혈1소시화재관주1、2、4、6 h(Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ조)취폐조직검측MDA;취폐조직작병이학관찰,병측정수술측폐습/간비.결과 각조동물술중혈류동역학지표평은;재결혈1 h화재관주1、2、4、6 h,Ⅲ조여Ⅱ조비교,폐습/간비급폐조직중MDA함량적차이균무통계학의의(P>0.05),Ⅰ조여Ⅱ、Ⅲ조비교차이유통계학의의(P<0.05).재상동적시간점,Ⅱ、Ⅲ조정현상사적폐손상병리개변,차교위명현적폐손상균출현재재관주4h,재관주6h폐손상균정회복추세.결론 폐외과중폐동맥조단화폐순배조단소치폐결혈일재관주손상특점상사,폐외과중폐혈관조단1h시안전적.
Objective To establish pulmonary vessel blocking model in rabbits and to investigate lung ischemia-reperfusion injury in pulmonary surgery.Methods Ninety-six New Zealand rabbits were randomly divided into 3 groups:group Ⅰ,control group;group Ⅱ,blocking pulmonary artery;group Ⅲ,blocking pulmonary artedes and veins.The content of MDA and the wet/dry ratio of the lung tissue were recorded at the time of opening chest(group Ⅰ),1h ischemia and 1,2,4,6 h reperfusion.Pathological changes of the lung were also observed at each time point.Results Homodynamic parameters were stable in all 3 groups.There was no significant difference in MDA and wet/dry ratio of the lung tissue between group Ⅱ and group Ⅲ(P>0.05),but there was significant difference between group Ⅰ and other two groups(P<0.05).Pathological study revealed that similar ischemia-reperfusion injury changes happened in both group Ⅱ and group Ⅲ,and the obvious injury happened at the time of 4 h repeffusion.At the time of 6 h reperfusion pathological changes in both group Ⅱ and group Ⅲ began to recover.Conclusion Lung ischemia-reperfusion injury caused by blocking pulmonary artery is similar to that caused by blocking pulmonary arteries and veins.It is safe to previously block pulmonary vessel8 within 1h during pulmonary surgery.