中国实用医刊
中國實用醫刊
중국실용의간
CENTRAL PLAINS MEDICAL JOURNAL
2011年
15期
23-25
,共3页
夏庆欣%庄兢%高阳%冯稳
夏慶訢%莊兢%高暘%馮穩
하경흔%장긍%고양%풍은
肾脏肿瘤%上皮样血管平滑肌脂肪瘤%病理学%免疫组织化学
腎髒腫瘤%上皮樣血管平滑肌脂肪瘤%病理學%免疫組織化學
신장종류%상피양혈관평활기지방류%병이학%면역조직화학
Kidney neoplasms%Epithelioid angiomyolipoma%Pathology%Immunohistochemistry
目的 探讨肾脏上皮样血管平滑肌脂肪瘤(EAML)的临床病理特点及鉴别诊断.方法 通过对2例EAML组织病理学观察、免疫组化标记分析,复习文献,讨论其诊断、鉴别诊断、临床生物学行为的可能性评估.结果 2例年龄分别为48、29岁,均无肉眼血尿,无结节硬化症;眼观:肿瘤位于肾脏内,肿瘤无包膜,均有出血、坏死;镜检:瘤细胞体积大,呈多边形,胞质丰富,嗜酸性或空泡状,可见核内包涵体,多核巨细胞散在其中.瘤细胞弥漫性实性排列,呈浸润性边缘;2例均未见典型血管平滑肌脂肪瘤(AML)图像.免疫组化染色显示瘤细胞HMB45、Mela-A、CD68阳性,SMA和vimentin散在性阳性,CK、EMA、RCC、CD10均阴性.结论 EAML是一种单向性分化的、缺乏AML经典形态的肿瘤,瘤细胞特异性表达HMB45可与其他肾脏肿瘤相鉴别,易复发和出现转移.
目的 探討腎髒上皮樣血管平滑肌脂肪瘤(EAML)的臨床病理特點及鑒彆診斷.方法 通過對2例EAML組織病理學觀察、免疫組化標記分析,複習文獻,討論其診斷、鑒彆診斷、臨床生物學行為的可能性評估.結果 2例年齡分彆為48、29歲,均無肉眼血尿,無結節硬化癥;眼觀:腫瘤位于腎髒內,腫瘤無包膜,均有齣血、壞死;鏡檢:瘤細胞體積大,呈多邊形,胞質豐富,嗜痠性或空泡狀,可見覈內包涵體,多覈巨細胞散在其中.瘤細胞瀰漫性實性排列,呈浸潤性邊緣;2例均未見典型血管平滑肌脂肪瘤(AML)圖像.免疫組化染色顯示瘤細胞HMB45、Mela-A、CD68暘性,SMA和vimentin散在性暘性,CK、EMA、RCC、CD10均陰性.結論 EAML是一種單嚮性分化的、缺乏AML經典形態的腫瘤,瘤細胞特異性錶達HMB45可與其他腎髒腫瘤相鑒彆,易複髮和齣現轉移.
목적 탐토신장상피양혈관평활기지방류(EAML)적림상병리특점급감별진단.방법 통과대2례EAML조직병이학관찰、면역조화표기분석,복습문헌,토론기진단、감별진단、림상생물학행위적가능성평고.결과 2례년령분별위48、29세,균무육안혈뇨,무결절경화증;안관:종류위우신장내,종류무포막,균유출혈、배사;경검:류세포체적대,정다변형,포질봉부,기산성혹공포상,가견핵내포함체,다핵거세포산재기중.류세포미만성실성배렬,정침윤성변연;2례균미견전형혈관평활기지방류(AML)도상.면역조화염색현시류세포HMB45、Mela-A、CD68양성,SMA화vimentin산재성양성,CK、EMA、RCC、CD10균음성.결론 EAML시일충단향성분화적、결핍AML경전형태적종류,류세포특이성표체HMB45가여기타신장종류상감별,역복발화출현전이.
Objective To investigate the clinicopathological features, differential diagnosis of renal epithelioid angiomyolipoma(EAML).Methods Two cases of EAML were analyzed by light microscopy and immunohistochemistry.The literature on this tumor was reviewed to discuss the histologic features, differential diagnosis and clinical behavior of EAML. Results Two patients were 48 and 29 years old. All cases with no gross hematuria or evidence of tuberous sclerosis, the location of each tumor was in the kidney. Tumors without capsule, with hemorrhage and necrosis.Microscopically,the neoplastic cells were large or huge,exhibited polygonal epithelioid appearance with abundant eosinophilic or clear cytoplasm. Some cells contained nucleoli and hyaline pseudoinclusions. Scattered multinucleated cells were also evident. The neoplastic cells were solid architecture in arrangement. All cases without evidence of AML. Immunohistochemically, the neoplastic cells were positive for HMB45, Mela-A, CD68 and focally positive for SMA and vimentin, but negative for CK, EMA,RCC and CD10. Conclusions EAML is a monotypic differentiated neoplasm , without evidence of AML, epithelioid cells with more specific HMB45 expression to differential diagnosis with other kidney tumors.Usually, local recurrence and distant or lymph node metastasis occur.