中华麻醉学杂志
中華痳醉學雜誌
중화마취학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY
2010年
2期
227-230
,共4页
陶星%李彦平%田鸣%槐庆元%李树人
陶星%李彥平%田鳴%槐慶元%李樹人
도성%리언평%전명%괴경원%리수인
异氟醚%二异丙酚%缺血预处理%心肌再灌注损伤
異氟醚%二異丙酚%缺血預處理%心肌再灌註損傷
이불미%이이병분%결혈예처리%심기재관주손상
Isoflurane%Propofol%Ischemic preconditioning%Myocardial reperfusion injury
目的 评价异氟醚预处理和异丙酚预处理对大鼠心肌缺血再灌注损伤的影响.方法 雄性Wistar大鼠36只,体重250~300 g,随机分为4组(n=9):缺血再灌注组(I/R组)、异氟醚预处理组(Ⅰ组)、异丙酚预处理组(P组)和异氟醚预处理联合异丙酚预处理组(I+P组).Ⅰ组异氟醚预处理方法:吸入1.6%异氟醚10 min,停止吸入5 min,共重复2次;P组异丙酚预处理方法:静脉输注异丙酚37.5 mg·kg~(-1)·h~(-1) 10 min,停止输注5 min,共重复2次;I+P组同时进行异氟醚预处理和异丙酚预处理.预处理后立即结扎左冠状动脉前降支60 min,随后松开进行再灌注,I/R组只进行缺血再灌注.再灌注120 min时每组取1只大鼠,取心肌组织,透射电镜下观察心肌细胞超微结构;各组其余大鼠处死后,取左心室,采用TUNEL法测定心肌细胞凋亡情况,计算凋亡指数,并测定心肌细胞线粒体活性氧(ROS)水平.结果 各组均可见凋亡小体,I组、P组和I+P组心肌损伤程度轻于I/R组.与I/R组比较,I组、P组和I+P组心肌细胞凋亡指数和ROS水平降低(P<0.05),而I组、P组和I+P组间上述指标比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 异氟醚预处理或异丙酚预处理及两种方法联合应用时减轻大鼠心肌缺血再灌注损伤的效应相似.
目的 評價異氟醚預處理和異丙酚預處理對大鼠心肌缺血再灌註損傷的影響.方法 雄性Wistar大鼠36隻,體重250~300 g,隨機分為4組(n=9):缺血再灌註組(I/R組)、異氟醚預處理組(Ⅰ組)、異丙酚預處理組(P組)和異氟醚預處理聯閤異丙酚預處理組(I+P組).Ⅰ組異氟醚預處理方法:吸入1.6%異氟醚10 min,停止吸入5 min,共重複2次;P組異丙酚預處理方法:靜脈輸註異丙酚37.5 mg·kg~(-1)·h~(-1) 10 min,停止輸註5 min,共重複2次;I+P組同時進行異氟醚預處理和異丙酚預處理.預處理後立即結扎左冠狀動脈前降支60 min,隨後鬆開進行再灌註,I/R組隻進行缺血再灌註.再灌註120 min時每組取1隻大鼠,取心肌組織,透射電鏡下觀察心肌細胞超微結構;各組其餘大鼠處死後,取左心室,採用TUNEL法測定心肌細胞凋亡情況,計算凋亡指數,併測定心肌細胞線粒體活性氧(ROS)水平.結果 各組均可見凋亡小體,I組、P組和I+P組心肌損傷程度輕于I/R組.與I/R組比較,I組、P組和I+P組心肌細胞凋亡指數和ROS水平降低(P<0.05),而I組、P組和I+P組間上述指標比較差異無統計學意義(P>0.05).結論 異氟醚預處理或異丙酚預處理及兩種方法聯閤應用時減輕大鼠心肌缺血再灌註損傷的效應相似.
목적 평개이불미예처리화이병분예처리대대서심기결혈재관주손상적영향.방법 웅성Wistar대서36지,체중250~300 g,수궤분위4조(n=9):결혈재관주조(I/R조)、이불미예처리조(Ⅰ조)、이병분예처리조(P조)화이불미예처리연합이병분예처리조(I+P조).Ⅰ조이불미예처리방법:흡입1.6%이불미10 min,정지흡입5 min,공중복2차;P조이병분예처리방법:정맥수주이병분37.5 mg·kg~(-1)·h~(-1) 10 min,정지수주5 min,공중복2차;I+P조동시진행이불미예처리화이병분예처리.예처리후립즉결찰좌관상동맥전강지60 min,수후송개진행재관주,I/R조지진행결혈재관주.재관주120 min시매조취1지대서,취심기조직,투사전경하관찰심기세포초미결구;각조기여대서처사후,취좌심실,채용TUNEL법측정심기세포조망정황,계산조망지수,병측정심기세포선립체활성양(ROS)수평.결과 각조균가견조망소체,I조、P조화I+P조심기손상정도경우I/R조.여I/R조비교,I조、P조화I+P조심기세포조망지수화ROS수평강저(P<0.05),이I조、P조화I+P조간상술지표비교차이무통계학의의(P>0.05).결론 이불미예처리혹이병분예처리급량충방법연합응용시감경대서심기결혈재관주손상적효응상사.
Objective To evaluate the effects of preconditioning with isoflurane and propofol on myocardial ischemia-reperfusion(I/R)injury in rots.Methods Thirty-six male Wistar rats weighing 250-300 g were randomly divided into 4 groups(n=9 each): group Ⅰ I/R; group Ⅱ isoflurane preconditioning(group Ⅰ);group Ⅲ propofol preconditioning(group P)and group Ⅳ preconditioning with isoflurane and propofol(group I+P).The animals were anesthetized with intraperitoneal urethane.The trachea was intubated.The animals were mechanically ventilated.In group Ⅱ and Ⅳ the animals received 2 episodes of 10 min 1.6% isoflurane inhalation at 5 min intervals before I/R; in group Ⅲ and Ⅳ the animals received 2 episodes of 10 rain iv propefol infusion at 37.5 mg·kg~(-1)·h~(-1) at 5 min intervals before I/R.Preconditioning with isoflurane and propefol was performed simultaneously in group I+P(Ⅳ).Myocardial I/R was produced by 60 min occlusion of left anterior descending coronary artery followed by 120 min reperfusion.The animals were sacrificed at the end of 120 min reperfusion and the hearts were removed for microscopic examination with transmission electron microscope,detection of myocyte apoptosis by TUNEL staining and determination of mitochondrial ROS level by fluorescence staining.Results Cardiomyocyte apoptosis was detected by transmission electron microscopy.Apoptosis index and mitochondrial ROS level were significantly lower in group I,group P and group I+P than in group I/R,but no difference was found among the 3 preconditioning groups.Conclusion The protection provided by preconditioning with isoflurane or propofol or isoflurane+propofol against myocardial I/R is comparable.