CAJ | 학술논문

目的观察热毒宁注射液治疗流行性出血热的疗效及不良反应.方法将98例流行性出血热患者随机分为两组.治疗组给予热毒宁注射液,对照组给予利巴韦林注射液.比较两组的疗效、病情转归和不良反应.结果治疗组退热疗效明显优于对照组(x2 =6.41,P＜0.05),退热时间、少尿期时间、总病程明显缩短(t =2.356,2.071,5.125,均P＜0.05).两组均未见明显不良反应.结论热毒宁注射液治疗流行性出血热疗效好,安全,值得推广应用.
목적 관찰열독저주사액치료류행성출혈열적료효급불량반응.방법 장98례류행성출혈열환자수궤분위량조.치료조급여열독저주사액,대조조급여리파위림주사액.비교량조적료효、병정전귀화불량반응.결과 치료조퇴열료효명현우우대조조(x2 =6.41,P＜0.05),퇴열시간、소뇨기시간、총병정명현축단(t =2.356,2.071,5.125,균P＜0.05).량조균미견명현불량반응.결론 열독저주사액치료류행성출혈열료효호,안전,치득추엄응용.
Objective To observe the effect and adverse reaction of Reduning injection in the treatment of epidemic hemorrhagic fever.Methods 98 patients with epidemic hemorrhagic fever were randonly divided into 2 groups,the treatment group was given Reduning injection ;The control group was given ribavirin injection;The efficacy and prognosis and adverse reaction were compared between two groups.Results The antipyretic effect of the treatment group was better than that of the control group ( x2 =6.41,P ＜ 0.05 ),and the fever clearance time,oliguria time,the total duration was significantly shortened( t =2.356,2.071,5.125,all P ＜ 0.05 ).There were no obvious adverse reaction in the two groups.Conclusion Reduning injection in the treatment of epidemic hemorrhagic fever had good curative effect,safety,and it was worthy of popularization and application.