中华超声影像学杂志
中華超聲影像學雜誌
중화초성영상학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF ULTRASONOGRAPHY
2010年
10期
866-869
,共4页
王小花%黄品同%赵淑丹%赵雅萍%薛念余%王亮%郑志强%王宗敏
王小花%黃品同%趙淑丹%趙雅萍%薛唸餘%王亮%鄭誌彊%王宗敏
왕소화%황품동%조숙단%조아평%설념여%왕량%정지강%왕종민
超声检查%微气泡%胃肠道间质肿瘤
超聲檢查%微氣泡%胃腸道間質腫瘤
초성검사%미기포%위장도간질종류
Ultrasonography%Microbubbles%Gastrointestinal stromal tumors
目的 评价超声双重造影(DCUS)对胃间质瘤(GST)的诊断价值.方法 对26例胃间质瘤的DCUS表现与病理诊断结果进行对照分析.结果 26例胃间质瘤中病理诊断为低危16例,高危10例.口服胃窗超声造影检查定位诊断正确率76.9%(20/26),DCUS定位诊断正确率为100%(26/26),两者比较差异有统计学意义(P=0.023).胃间质瘤的生物学行为与病灶大小、形态、内部有无坏死、液化及超声造影增强模式有关(P<0.05),与病灶的边界及有无转移无关(P>0.05).26例患者中,口服胃窗超声造影检出病灶中坏死液化区7例,DCUS检出病灶中坏死液化区13例,两者比较差异有统计学意义(x2=4.426,P=0.035).结论 DCUS可用于胃间质瘤的定性和定位诊断,可为胃间质瘤的治疗方案选择提供指导和参考意见.
目的 評價超聲雙重造影(DCUS)對胃間質瘤(GST)的診斷價值.方法 對26例胃間質瘤的DCUS錶現與病理診斷結果進行對照分析.結果 26例胃間質瘤中病理診斷為低危16例,高危10例.口服胃窗超聲造影檢查定位診斷正確率76.9%(20/26),DCUS定位診斷正確率為100%(26/26),兩者比較差異有統計學意義(P=0.023).胃間質瘤的生物學行為與病竈大小、形態、內部有無壞死、液化及超聲造影增彊模式有關(P<0.05),與病竈的邊界及有無轉移無關(P>0.05).26例患者中,口服胃窗超聲造影檢齣病竈中壞死液化區7例,DCUS檢齣病竈中壞死液化區13例,兩者比較差異有統計學意義(x2=4.426,P=0.035).結論 DCUS可用于胃間質瘤的定性和定位診斷,可為胃間質瘤的治療方案選擇提供指導和參攷意見.
목적 평개초성쌍중조영(DCUS)대위간질류(GST)적진단개치.방법 대26례위간질류적DCUS표현여병리진단결과진행대조분석.결과 26례위간질류중병리진단위저위16례,고위10례.구복위창초성조영검사정위진단정학솔76.9%(20/26),DCUS정위진단정학솔위100%(26/26),량자비교차이유통계학의의(P=0.023).위간질류적생물학행위여병조대소、형태、내부유무배사、액화급초성조영증강모식유관(P<0.05),여병조적변계급유무전이무관(P>0.05).26례환자중,구복위창초성조영검출병조중배사액화구7례,DCUS검출병조중배사액화구13례,량자비교차이유통계학의의(x2=4.426,P=0.035).결론 DCUS가용우위간질류적정성화정위진단,가위위간질류적치료방안선택제공지도화삼고의견.
Objective To evaluate clinical value of double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography(DCUS)in diagnosing gastric stromal tumors(GST). Methods The medical records of 26 patients with a histological diagnosis of GST were retrospectively reviewed. The correlation between DCUS features and pathological findings of the lesions was compared. Results Total 26 cases of GST were divided into low risk group( 16 cases) and high risk group (10 cases). The size,contour,liquefactive necrosis and enhancement distribution of lesions were markedly correlated with the pathobiologic behaviour of the tumor ( P <0.05). There was no significant difference in border and metastasis of lesions between two groups( P >0.05). It was shown that DCUS supplied statistically significant improvement in the localization diagnosis and detection of liquefactive necrosis versus oral contrast-enhanced ultrasonography ( P < 0.05 ). Conclusions DCUS is considered as a valuable tool in diagnosing location as well as pathobiological behaviour of GST. It can provide the guidance and reference comments for treatment algorithms.