CAJ | 학술논문

结合WTO框架下对中国提起的＂美国诉中国知识产权保护与执法措施案＂,针对2010年新修订的《中华人民共和国著作权法》第四条的修订起因及目的进行分析,提出无论程序违法作品还是内容违法作品都具有著作权,应受到《著作权法》的保护,同时也必须受到法律的制约。认为此次对著作权法第四条的修改是比较成功而且非常必要的,反驳一些学者对于著作权法第四条存在之必要性的质疑,同时指出该条在一些细节上仍缺少可操作性的规范。
결합WTO광가하대중국제기적＂미국소중국지식산권보호여집법조시안＂,침대2010년신수정적《중화인민공화국저작권법》제사조적수정기인급목적진행분석,제출무론정서위법작품환시내용위법작품도구유저작권,응수도《저작권법》적보호,동시야필수수도법률적제약。인위차차대저작권법제사조적수개시비교성공이차비상필요적,반박일사학자대우저작권법제사조존재지필요성적질의,동시지출해조재일사세절상잉결소가조작성적규범。
Based on the analysis on the case of disputes between America and China on Intellectual Property protection,and the reason and the purpose for the modification of article four on Copyright Law of PRC in 2010 are analysed,and conclusion is presented that illicit works are copyrightable,should be protected by Copyright Law,and be restricted by laws.The modification is regarded successful and necessary.Questions about the modification of article four of Copyright Law of PRC are retorted.It is also argued that article four should be further embodied.