CAJ | 학술논문

采用形态度量学方法对分布于长江、珠江、九龙江、海南岛和闽江的福建纹胸和中华纹胸 126个个体框架结构测量中的23个指标进行了主成分分析，以探求中华纹胸和福建纹胸的物种有效性。初步研究结果表明各样本贡献值较大的前4个主成分在数值上并没有明显的差异。显然，以上2个物种在形态上并没有明显的区别，福建纹胸应为中华纹胸的同物异名，而不应为一个独立的物种。
채용형태도량학방법대분포우장강、주강、구룡강、해남도화민강적복건문흉화중화문흉 126개개체광가결구측량중적23개지표진행료주성분분석，이탐구중화문흉화복건문흉적물충유효성。초보연구결과표명각양본공헌치교대적전4개주성분재수치상병몰유명현적차이。현연，이상2개물충재형태상병몰유명현적구별，복건문흉응위중화문흉적동물이명，이불응위일개독립적물충。
To explore the species validation of Glyptothorax sinense (Regan) and G. fukiensis (Rendahl), a principle analysis was conducted on 23 measurements of truss networks in 126 individuals collected from Yangtze River, Pearl River, Jiulongjiang River, Hainan Island and Minjiang River using the method of morphometrics. The preliminary analysis result indicates that among the first four principle components there is no prominent difference. Therefore, it should be regarded that the two species have no prominent difference in morphology and G. fikiensis should be considered as the synonyms of G. sinense.