中华神经医学杂志
中華神經醫學雜誌
중화신경의학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF NEUROMEDICINE
2012年
8期
807-811
,共5页
吴静%林昭敏%林小娟%于慧玲%王梅平
吳靜%林昭敏%林小娟%于慧玲%王梅平
오정%림소민%림소연%우혜령%왕매평
阿尔茨海默病%胆碱酯酶抑制剂%神经心理测验%事件相关电位
阿爾茨海默病%膽堿酯酶抑製劑%神經心理測驗%事件相關電位
아이자해묵병%담감지매억제제%신경심리측험%사건상관전위
Alzheimer's disease% Cholinesterase inhibitor% Neuropsychological test%Event-related potential
目的 观察不同剂量胆碱酯酶抑制剂-多奈哌齐治疗阿尔茨海默病(AD)的疗效,分析不同AD评定量表之间相关性,为临床选择合适的AD疗效评估工具提供参考. 方法 选择福建省老年医院神经内科自2010年1月至2010年11月收治的69例AD患者作为观察对象,予以认知量表和电生理认知指标检查后采用随机数字表法分为2组,分别服用多奈哌齐5 mg每天(33例)和10 mg每天(36例),持续服用12个月.干预后第3、6、9、12个月时复查上述各项指标.结果 2组患者采用多奈哌齐干预后,简易智能精神状态量表(MMSE)、AD评定量表认知部分(AOAS-cog)、日常生活能力量表(ADL)、工具性日常生活能力量表(LADL)、N200、P300等指标均有明显改善,其中2组患者MMSE评分、ADAS-cog分值、P300变化的差异有统计学意义(P<o.05),且10mg组优于5 mg组.MMSE量表与ADAS-cog量表之间存在相关性(r=-0.378,P=0.001),N200、P300 与ADAS-cog量表、MMSE量表之间不存在相关性(P>0.05). 结论 多奈哌齐治疗轻中度AD疗效可靠且存在剂量效应.痴呆评定量表如MMSE、ADAS-cog之间具有良好的相关性,联合使用可提高效果.
目的 觀察不同劑量膽堿酯酶抑製劑-多奈哌齊治療阿爾茨海默病(AD)的療效,分析不同AD評定量錶之間相關性,為臨床選擇閤適的AD療效評估工具提供參攷. 方法 選擇福建省老年醫院神經內科自2010年1月至2010年11月收治的69例AD患者作為觀察對象,予以認知量錶和電生理認知指標檢查後採用隨機數字錶法分為2組,分彆服用多奈哌齊5 mg每天(33例)和10 mg每天(36例),持續服用12箇月.榦預後第3、6、9、12箇月時複查上述各項指標.結果 2組患者採用多奈哌齊榦預後,簡易智能精神狀態量錶(MMSE)、AD評定量錶認知部分(AOAS-cog)、日常生活能力量錶(ADL)、工具性日常生活能力量錶(LADL)、N200、P300等指標均有明顯改善,其中2組患者MMSE評分、ADAS-cog分值、P300變化的差異有統計學意義(P<o.05),且10mg組優于5 mg組.MMSE量錶與ADAS-cog量錶之間存在相關性(r=-0.378,P=0.001),N200、P300 與ADAS-cog量錶、MMSE量錶之間不存在相關性(P>0.05). 結論 多奈哌齊治療輕中度AD療效可靠且存在劑量效應.癡呆評定量錶如MMSE、ADAS-cog之間具有良好的相關性,聯閤使用可提高效果.
목적 관찰불동제량담감지매억제제-다내고제치료아이자해묵병(AD)적료효,분석불동AD평정량표지간상관성,위림상선택합괄적AD료효평고공구제공삼고. 방법 선택복건성노년의원신경내과자2010년1월지2010년11월수치적69례AD환자작위관찰대상,여이인지량표화전생리인지지표검사후채용수궤수자표법분위2조,분별복용다내고제5 mg매천(33례)화10 mg매천(36례),지속복용12개월.간예후제3、6、9、12개월시복사상술각항지표.결과 2조환자채용다내고제간예후,간역지능정신상태량표(MMSE)、AD평정량표인지부분(AOAS-cog)、일상생활능역량표(ADL)、공구성일상생활능역량표(LADL)、N200、P300등지표균유명현개선,기중2조환자MMSE평분、ADAS-cog분치、P300변화적차이유통계학의의(P<o.05),차10mg조우우5 mg조.MMSE량표여ADAS-cog량표지간존재상관성(r=-0.378,P=0.001),N200、P300 여ADAS-cog량표、MMSE량표지간불존재상관성(P>0.05). 결론 다내고제치료경중도AD료효가고차존재제량효응.치태평정량표여MMSE、ADAS-cog지간구유량호적상관성,연합사용가제고효과.
Objective To compare the effects of different doses ofdonepezil,the cholinesterase inhibitor,on patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD) and analyze the correlations of different rating scales of AD so as to choose a better evaluation tool for AD treatment efficacy.Methods Sixty-nine AD patients,admitted to our hospital from January 2010 to November 2010,were randomly divided into 5 mg donepezil treatment group (n=33) and 10 mg donepezil treatment group (n=36); the treatments were given daily for a consecutive 12 months.They were performed Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE),Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive sub scale (ADAS-cog),activities of daily living (ADL) and instrumental activities of daily living (LADL) every 3 months (3,6,9 and 12 months after the first evaluation time). Results Improvements were noted in both groups on MMSE scores,ADAS-cog scores,ADL scores,IADL scores,and latency of P300 and N200:the MMSE scores,ADAS-cog scores and latency of P300 in the 10 mg treatment group were obviously higher/longer than those in the 5 mg treatment group.Relation between MMSE scores and ADAS-cog scores was noted (r=-0.378,P=0.001).No relation was noted on neuro-psychology and electrophysiology of these patients (P>0.05). Conclusion Donepezil is safe and effective in improving cognition of patients with mild to moderate AD,and has obvious dose-effect:the efficacy of 10 mg donepezil is superior to that of 5 mg donepezil; the parameters of cognitive assessment in neuro-psychology were found having relation with each other,which can be used with combination to improve the evaluation efficacy.