中华流行病学杂志
中華流行病學雜誌
중화류행병학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
2008年
12期
1189-1192
,共4页
段琼红%许毅从%梁勋寅%袁修柏%赵焕虎%冉鹏
段瓊紅%許毅從%樑勛寅%袁脩柏%趙煥虎%冉鵬
단경홍%허의종%량훈인%원수백%조환호%염붕
血吸虫病%家庭负担量表%信度%效度%敏感性
血吸蟲病%傢庭負擔量錶%信度%效度%敏感性
혈흡충병%가정부담량표%신도%효도%민감성
Schistosomiasis%Family Burden Scale%Reliability%Validity%Sensitivity
目的 评价家庭负担量表(FBS)应用于血吸虫病患者家庭负担调查的信度、效度及敏感性.方法 用FBS对224例血吸虫病患者进行现场调查.采用Cronbach's α和折半信度评价量表的信度,因子分析法评价量表的效度,用方差分析比较不同收入水平患者的评分以评价量表的敏感性.结果 量表的内容一致性较高,整个量表的Cronbach's α和折半信度分别为0.874和0.939;量表各个维度的Cronbach's α和折半信度大多在0.70以上;采用冈子分析法,共提取6个公因子,累计贡献率为66.76%,基本证实了其结构效度;该量表能够区分不同收入水平患者家庭负担之间的差异(P<0.001),证实其敏感性较好.结论 FBS具有较好的信度、效度及敏感性,可用于血吸虫病患者的家庭负担调查.
目的 評價傢庭負擔量錶(FBS)應用于血吸蟲病患者傢庭負擔調查的信度、效度及敏感性.方法 用FBS對224例血吸蟲病患者進行現場調查.採用Cronbach's α和摺半信度評價量錶的信度,因子分析法評價量錶的效度,用方差分析比較不同收入水平患者的評分以評價量錶的敏感性.結果 量錶的內容一緻性較高,整箇量錶的Cronbach's α和摺半信度分彆為0.874和0.939;量錶各箇維度的Cronbach's α和摺半信度大多在0.70以上;採用岡子分析法,共提取6箇公因子,纍計貢獻率為66.76%,基本證實瞭其結構效度;該量錶能夠區分不同收入水平患者傢庭負擔之間的差異(P<0.001),證實其敏感性較好.結論 FBS具有較好的信度、效度及敏感性,可用于血吸蟲病患者的傢庭負擔調查.
목적 평개가정부담량표(FBS)응용우혈흡충병환자가정부담조사적신도、효도급민감성.방법 용FBS대224례혈흡충병환자진행현장조사.채용Cronbach's α화절반신도평개량표적신도,인자분석법평개량표적효도,용방차분석비교불동수입수평환자적평분이평개량표적민감성.결과 량표적내용일치성교고,정개량표적Cronbach's α화절반신도분별위0.874화0.939;량표각개유도적Cronbach's α화절반신도대다재0.70이상;채용강자분석법,공제취6개공인자,루계공헌솔위66.76%,기본증실료기결구효도;해량표능구구분불동수입수평환자가정부담지간적차이(P<0.001),증실기민감성교호.결론 FBS구유교호적신도、효도급민감성,가용우혈흡충병환자적가정부담조사.
Objective To evaluate the reliability, validity and sensitivity of a Family Burden Scale (FBS) of disease used on schistosomiasis. Methods 224 schistosomiasis patients were investigated, using the FBS. Reliability was estimated by Cronbach's α coefficient and split-half reliability. Validity was tested by factor analysis. Sensitivity was evaluated by comparison of patients with different income levels. Results The Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.874 and split-half reliability was 0.939 for FBS, respectively. Most values of Cronbach's α and split-half reliability for each component of scale were above 0.70. Construct validity was appraised by factor analysis, and 6 factors were identified. These factors could explain 66.76 % of the total variance. Patients with different income levels showed significant difference in terms of family burden for schistosomiasis (P<0.001 ). Conclusion This FBS appeared to have satisfactory reliability, validity and sensitivity and could be used in evaluating family burden of schistosomiasis patients.