中华内分泌代谢杂志
中華內分泌代謝雜誌
중화내분비대사잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY AND METABOLISM
2012年
4期
301-305
,共5页
徐媛媛%蒋怡然%苏颋为%蔡剑飞%叶俊娜%宁光%王卫庆
徐媛媛%蔣怡然%囌颋為%蔡劍飛%葉俊娜%寧光%王衛慶
서원원%장이연%소정위%채검비%협준나%저광%왕위경
原发性醛固酮增多症%醛固酮/肾素比值%筛查试验%生理盐水试验
原髮性醛固酮增多癥%醛固酮/腎素比值%篩查試驗%生理鹽水試驗
원발성철고동증다증%철고동/신소비치%사사시험%생리염수시험
Primary aldosteronism%Aldosterone to renin ratio%Screening test%Saline infusion test
目的 回顾分析瑞金医院内分泌科近5年怀疑原发性醛固酮增多症患者的资料,用受试者工作特征( receiver operating characteristic,ROC)曲线下面积评估醛固酮/肾素比值(aldosterone to renin ratio,ARR)在诊断原发性醛固酮增多症(原醛症)中的临床价值.方法 收集瑞金医院内分泌科2006年1月至2010年8月行卧位及立位ARR测定的590例怀疑原发性醛固酮增多症入院患者的临床资料,其中确诊为原醛症的患者357例,确诊为原发性高血压的患者233例.分析瑞金医院内分泌科2010年9月至2011年4月行随机及立位ARR测定的100例怀疑原醛症患者的临床资料,其中确诊为原醛症的患者29例,确诊为原发性高血压的患者71例.综合分析卧位、立位及随机ARR ROC曲线,以确定合适的切点用于诊断原发性醛固酮增多症.结果 2006年1月至2010年8月行卧位及立位ARR测定的590例患者卧位ARRROC曲线下面积为0.838(0.805~0.867),立位ARR ROC曲线下面积为0.873(0.843 ~0.899),两曲线下面积比较有显著差异(P<0.01).2010年9月至2011年4月行立位及随机ARR测定的100例患者立位及随机ARR ROC曲线下面积分别为0.962(0.928 ~0.995)及0.944(0.893 ~0.994),两者比较无显著差异(P>0.05).立位ARR切点为400(pg· ml-1)/(ng·ml-1·h-1)时,诊断原醛症患者的敏感性为91.9%,特异性为64.2%.结论 立位ARR比卧位ARR更适应作为原醛症的筛查指标,随机ARR与立位ARR在原醛症诊断中具有相似的临床价值.本研究认为,在严格控制患者药物、体位、检测时间条件下,ARR切点400( pg·ml-1)/(ng·ml-1·h-1)是原醛症筛查试验比较合适的切点.
目的 迴顧分析瑞金醫院內分泌科近5年懷疑原髮性醛固酮增多癥患者的資料,用受試者工作特徵( receiver operating characteristic,ROC)麯線下麵積評估醛固酮/腎素比值(aldosterone to renin ratio,ARR)在診斷原髮性醛固酮增多癥(原醛癥)中的臨床價值.方法 收集瑞金醫院內分泌科2006年1月至2010年8月行臥位及立位ARR測定的590例懷疑原髮性醛固酮增多癥入院患者的臨床資料,其中確診為原醛癥的患者357例,確診為原髮性高血壓的患者233例.分析瑞金醫院內分泌科2010年9月至2011年4月行隨機及立位ARR測定的100例懷疑原醛癥患者的臨床資料,其中確診為原醛癥的患者29例,確診為原髮性高血壓的患者71例.綜閤分析臥位、立位及隨機ARR ROC麯線,以確定閤適的切點用于診斷原髮性醛固酮增多癥.結果 2006年1月至2010年8月行臥位及立位ARR測定的590例患者臥位ARRROC麯線下麵積為0.838(0.805~0.867),立位ARR ROC麯線下麵積為0.873(0.843 ~0.899),兩麯線下麵積比較有顯著差異(P<0.01).2010年9月至2011年4月行立位及隨機ARR測定的100例患者立位及隨機ARR ROC麯線下麵積分彆為0.962(0.928 ~0.995)及0.944(0.893 ~0.994),兩者比較無顯著差異(P>0.05).立位ARR切點為400(pg· ml-1)/(ng·ml-1·h-1)時,診斷原醛癥患者的敏感性為91.9%,特異性為64.2%.結論 立位ARR比臥位ARR更適應作為原醛癥的篩查指標,隨機ARR與立位ARR在原醛癥診斷中具有相似的臨床價值.本研究認為,在嚴格控製患者藥物、體位、檢測時間條件下,ARR切點400( pg·ml-1)/(ng·ml-1·h-1)是原醛癥篩查試驗比較閤適的切點.
목적 회고분석서금의원내분비과근5년부의원발성철고동증다증환자적자료,용수시자공작특정( receiver operating characteristic,ROC)곡선하면적평고철고동/신소비치(aldosterone to renin ratio,ARR)재진단원발성철고동증다증(원철증)중적림상개치.방법 수집서금의원내분비과2006년1월지2010년8월행와위급립위ARR측정적590례부의원발성철고동증다증입원환자적림상자료,기중학진위원철증적환자357례,학진위원발성고혈압적환자233례.분석서금의원내분비과2010년9월지2011년4월행수궤급립위ARR측정적100례부의원철증환자적림상자료,기중학진위원철증적환자29례,학진위원발성고혈압적환자71례.종합분석와위、립위급수궤ARR ROC곡선,이학정합괄적절점용우진단원발성철고동증다증.결과 2006년1월지2010년8월행와위급립위ARR측정적590례환자와위ARRROC곡선하면적위0.838(0.805~0.867),립위ARR ROC곡선하면적위0.873(0.843 ~0.899),량곡선하면적비교유현저차이(P<0.01).2010년9월지2011년4월행립위급수궤ARR측정적100례환자립위급수궤ARR ROC곡선하면적분별위0.962(0.928 ~0.995)급0.944(0.893 ~0.994),량자비교무현저차이(P>0.05).립위ARR절점위400(pg· ml-1)/(ng·ml-1·h-1)시,진단원철증환자적민감성위91.9%,특이성위64.2%.결론 립위ARR비와위ARR경괄응작위원철증적사사지표,수궤ARR여립위ARR재원철증진단중구유상사적림상개치.본연구인위,재엄격공제환자약물、체위、검측시간조건하,ARR절점400( pg·ml-1)/(ng·ml-1·h-1)시원철증사사시험비교합괄적절점.
Objective To retrospectively analyse the data of patients with suspected primary aldosteronism (PA) during the last five years.The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the value of aldosterone to renin ratio (ARR) in screening primary aldosteronism.Methods The clinical data of ARR in supine and upright positions were collected in 590 patients with suspected during January 2006 to August 2010.There were 357 patients diagnosed as primary aldosteronism and 233 patients as essential hypertension among these patients.100 patients with suspected primary aldosteronism took the upright and random ARR during September 2010 to April 2011 ; Among these patients,29 patients were diagnosed as primary aldosteronism and 71 as cases of essential hypertension.ROC curve was made to retrospectively define the method and the cut-off value of the supine,upright or random ARR.Results The area under the curve(AUC) of the supine ARR in the 590 patients who took the supine and upright ARR during January 2006 to August 2010 was 0.838 (0.805-0.867 ) and the AUC of the upright ARR was 0.873 (0.843-0.899 ).There was significant difference between these two AUC readings (P<0.01 ).The AUC in the upright ARR of the 100 patients who took the upright and random ARR during Septeuder 2010 to April 2011 was 0.962 (0.928 -0.995 ) and the AUC of the random ARR was 0.944 (0.893-0.994 ).There was no significant difference between these two AUC readings (P>0.05).The upright ARR cutoff value with 400 ( pg · ml-1 )/( ng· ml-1 · h 1 ) yielded a sensitivity of 91.9% and a specificity of 64.2% to diagnosis of PA.Conclusion Upright ARR value was more suitable in the screening test than supine ARR value.Random ARR showed similar effect as the upright ARR.In our research,under strict control of the drug,position and detection time,ARR value with 400 ( pg · ml-1 )/( ng· ml-1 · h-1 ) can be the cutoff point in screening the suspcctcd PA patients.