临床骨科杂志
臨床骨科雜誌
림상골과잡지
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS
2001年
1期
42-43,44
,共3页
杨世祥%赵武%邓倪%李育粒%李喜庆
楊世祥%趙武%鄧倪%李育粒%李喜慶
양세상%조무%산예%리육립%리희경
骨折,不愈合%骨移植%自动粘骨加压器
骨摺,不愈閤%骨移植%自動粘骨加壓器
골절,불유합%골이식%자동점골가압기
目的 探讨自动粘骨加压器治疗四肢长骨骨不连疗效。方法 采用自动粘骨加压器植骨治疗四肢长骨骨不连30例,并同时治疗粉碎性骨折30例作对照。结果 随访5个月~4年,骨不连组:5~7周愈合9例,占30%;8~11周愈合12例,占40%;12~14周愈合9例,占30%。骨折组:5~7周愈合7例,占23%;8~11周愈合12例,占40%;12~14周愈合11例,占37%。两组均无肌肉萎缩、关节僵硬等并发症发生。两组疗效差异无显著性(P>0.05)。结论 自动粘骨加压器并植骨治疗四肢长骨骨不连的疗效肯定。
目的 探討自動粘骨加壓器治療四肢長骨骨不連療效。方法 採用自動粘骨加壓器植骨治療四肢長骨骨不連30例,併同時治療粉碎性骨摺30例作對照。結果 隨訪5箇月~4年,骨不連組:5~7週愈閤9例,佔30%;8~11週愈閤12例,佔40%;12~14週愈閤9例,佔30%。骨摺組:5~7週愈閤7例,佔23%;8~11週愈閤12例,佔40%;12~14週愈閤11例,佔37%。兩組均無肌肉萎縮、關節僵硬等併髮癥髮生。兩組療效差異無顯著性(P>0.05)。結論 自動粘骨加壓器併植骨治療四肢長骨骨不連的療效肯定。
목적 탐토자동점골가압기치료사지장골골불련료효。방법 채용자동점골가압기식골치료사지장골골불련30례,병동시치료분쇄성골절30례작대조。결과 수방5개월~4년,골불련조:5~7주유합9례,점30%;8~11주유합12례,점40%;12~14주유합9례,점30%。골절조:5~7주유합7례,점23%;8~11주유합12례,점40%;12~14주유합11례,점37%。량조균무기육위축、관절강경등병발증발생。량조료효차이무현저성(P>0.05)。결론 자동점골가압기병식골치료사지장골골불련적료효긍정。
Objective To investigate effect of automatic compressive device on the treatment of long-bone nonunion in the limbs. Methods 30 cases of long-bone nonunion and 30 cases of long-bone fraction of the limbs were treated with automatic compressive device. Re sults The patients were followed up for 5 months to 4 years. In group of bone nonunion, 9 cases were cured in 5 to 7 weeks,up to 30%; 12 cases were cured in 8 to 11 weeks,up to 40% and 9 cases were cured in 12 to 14 weeks, up to 30%. In group of fracture:7 cases were cured in 5 to 7 weeks, up to 23%; 12 cases were cured in 8 to 11 weeks, up to 40%; 11 cases w ere cured in 12 to 14 weeks, up to 37%. There were no such complications as muscular atrophy and join stiff. There is no statistic difference in curative effect in the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion The automatic pressurize device is an effective tool in the treatment of limbs long-bone-nonunion.