CAJ | 학술논문

目的比较鼻内镜下经口动力系统切割器行腺样体切除术与常规腺样体刮除术的疗效.方法腺样体肥大患儿136例,其中69例接受鼻内镜下动力系统切割器行腺样体切除术,67例接受常规腺样体刮除术,比较两种术式的疗效.结果常规腺样体刮除术治疗组中有5例存在腺样体残留,有2例存在并发症(出血及咽鼓管咽口损伤),而鼻内镜下动力系统切割器行腺样体切除术无1例腺样体残留及并发症.结论鼻内镜下动力系统切割器经口腺样体切除术是治疗腺样体肥大的最好手术方式.
목적 비교비내경하경구동력계통절할기행선양체절제술여상규선양체괄제술적료효.방법 선양체비대환인136례,기중69례접수비내경하동력계통절할기행선양체절제술,67례접수상규선양체괄제술,비교량충술식적료효.결과 상규선양체괄제술치료조중유5례존재선양체잔류,유2례존재병발증(출혈급인고관인구손상),이비내경하동력계통절할기행선양체절제술무1례선양체잔류급병발증.결론 비내경하동력계통절할기경구선양체절제술시치료선양체비대적최호수술방식.
Objective The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of dynamical system cutterbar via nasal endoscope for adenoidectomy by mouth and rout curet-tage of adenoids. Methods 136 cases with adenoid hypertrophy, 69 cases underwent dynamical system cutterbar via nasal endoscope for adenoidectomy by mouth while 67 cases were performed by rout curettage of adenoids. Then compared the curative effect with two groups. Results 8 cases had adenoid residual ,3 cases had complication(bleeding or the impairment of ostium tubae anditive) in the rout curettage of adenoids group. No adenoid residual or other complication had been noted in dynamical system cutterbar via nasal endoscope for adenoidectomy by mouth group. Conclusion Dynamical system cutterbar via nasal endoscope for adenoidectomy by mouth is the best way to cure adenoid hypertrophy in present time.