中华外科杂志
中華外科雜誌
중화외과잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF SURGERY
2008年
18期
1382-1385
,共4页
廖盛日%陈敏华%戴莹%赵爱莲%李明%顾晋
廖盛日%陳敏華%戴瑩%趙愛蓮%李明%顧晉
료성일%진민화%대형%조애련%리명%고진
结直肠肿瘤%腔内超声检查%诊断
結直腸腫瘤%腔內超聲檢查%診斷
결직장종류%강내초성검사%진단
Colorectal neoplasms%Endosonography%Diagnosis
目的 总结TRUS对直肠癌浸润深度诊断准确性,分析探讨TRUS在早期直肠癌诊断中的应用.方法 2002年1月至2007年10月163例直肠癌患者术前行TRUS检查,参考国际抗癌联盟有关直肠癌分期标准进行浸润深度分期诊断,并与手术病理结果对照.163例直肠癌中经病理检查证实16例为早期癌.研究病例术前均未接受放化疗.结果 TRUS对早期直肠癌(pT1)诊断灵敏性为87.5%(14/16),特异性达98.6%(145/147),阳性预测值为87.5%(14/16).对早期癌浸润深度进一步分析,TRUS对黏膜癌及黏膜下层癌诊断灵敏性分别为85.7%(6/7)、66.7%(6/9).16例早期癌(pT1)经肛门注水充盈直肠后再次行TRUS检查,病变均显示清晰.14例正确诊断为pT1期;未充盈直肠的情况下,仅6例病变显示清晰,仅3例诊断正确.早期癌声像图表现分为二型:隆起型、溃疡型,以隆起型多见,占81.6%(13/16).结论 TRUS在早期直肠癌的诊断中是一项有价值的影像学方法,经肛门注水充盈直肠后,明显提高了早期癌病变显示率及诊断准确性.
目的 總結TRUS對直腸癌浸潤深度診斷準確性,分析探討TRUS在早期直腸癌診斷中的應用.方法 2002年1月至2007年10月163例直腸癌患者術前行TRUS檢查,參攷國際抗癌聯盟有關直腸癌分期標準進行浸潤深度分期診斷,併與手術病理結果對照.163例直腸癌中經病理檢查證實16例為早期癌.研究病例術前均未接受放化療.結果 TRUS對早期直腸癌(pT1)診斷靈敏性為87.5%(14/16),特異性達98.6%(145/147),暘性預測值為87.5%(14/16).對早期癌浸潤深度進一步分析,TRUS對黏膜癌及黏膜下層癌診斷靈敏性分彆為85.7%(6/7)、66.7%(6/9).16例早期癌(pT1)經肛門註水充盈直腸後再次行TRUS檢查,病變均顯示清晰.14例正確診斷為pT1期;未充盈直腸的情況下,僅6例病變顯示清晰,僅3例診斷正確.早期癌聲像圖錶現分為二型:隆起型、潰瘍型,以隆起型多見,佔81.6%(13/16).結論 TRUS在早期直腸癌的診斷中是一項有價值的影像學方法,經肛門註水充盈直腸後,明顯提高瞭早期癌病變顯示率及診斷準確性.
목적 총결TRUS대직장암침윤심도진단준학성,분석탐토TRUS재조기직장암진단중적응용.방법 2002년1월지2007년10월163례직장암환자술전행TRUS검사,삼고국제항암련맹유관직장암분기표준진행침윤심도분기진단,병여수술병리결과대조.163례직장암중경병리검사증실16례위조기암.연구병례술전균미접수방화료.결과 TRUS대조기직장암(pT1)진단령민성위87.5%(14/16),특이성체98.6%(145/147),양성예측치위87.5%(14/16).대조기암침윤심도진일보분석,TRUS대점막암급점막하층암진단령민성분별위85.7%(6/7)、66.7%(6/9).16례조기암(pT1)경항문주수충영직장후재차행TRUS검사,병변균현시청석.14례정학진단위pT1기;미충영직장적정황하,부6례병변현시청석,부3례진단정학.조기암성상도표현분위이형:륭기형、궤양형,이륭기형다견,점81.6%(13/16).결론 TRUS재조기직장암적진단중시일항유개치적영상학방법,경항문주수충영직장후,명현제고료조기암병변현시솔급진단준학성.
Objective To evaluate the accuracy of transrectal ultragonography(TRUS)in the assessment of the invasion depth of rectal cancer,and analyze the value of TRUS in diagnosis of early rectal cancer.Methods TRUS wag performed preoperatively in 163 patients with rectal cancer,and the results Was compared with the postoperative pathological findings according to TNM stasing.The early rectal cancer Was diagnosed if the lesion Was limited to mueosa and submucosa.The tumor located in mucosa was defined as mucosal cancer.while as submucosal cancer when the tumor invading into submucosa.Sixteen eases were confirmed as early cancer by pathology after the operation.No patients received chemotherapy andradiotherapy before operation.Results The sensitivity of TRUS in the staging of the early rectal cancer Was87.5%(14/16),specificity was 98.6%(145/147),and the positive predictive valne was 87.5%(14/16).The sensitivity of TRUS in predicting mucosal and submueosal cancer Was 85.7%(6/7)and 66.7%(6/9),respectively.Sixteen patients with early rectal cancer were examined before and after filling rectum with water.Mter filling rectum,all tumors were visualized clearly,while 14 tumors were correctly diagnosed as early rectal cancer.Before filling rectum,only 6 tumors were visualized clearly,and 3 tuomrs were staged correctly.The ultrasonographic appearance of early rectal cancer manifested in two kinds:protruded and ulcerative.and most were protruded(81.6%).Conclusions TRUS is a valuable imaging examination for diagnosis of early rectal cancer preoperatively. Visualization rate and diagnostic accuracy of early rectal cancer are improved dramatically after filling rectum with water.