中华临床感染病杂志
中華臨床感染病雜誌
중화림상감염병잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES
2012年
3期
137-141
,共5页
宋伟泉%徐尧江%张要栋%吕国才%郑临%杨益大
宋偉泉%徐堯江%張要棟%呂國纔%鄭臨%楊益大
송위천%서요강%장요동%려국재%정림%양익대
肝炎,乙型,慢性%失代偿期肝硬化%拉米夫定%阿德福韦酯%恩替卡韦%联合治疗
肝炎,乙型,慢性%失代償期肝硬化%拉米伕定%阿德福韋酯%恩替卡韋%聯閤治療
간염,을형,만성%실대상기간경화%랍미부정%아덕복위지%은체잡위%연합치료
Chronic hepatitis B%Decompensated liver cirrhosis%Lamivudine%Adefovir dipivoxil%Entecavir%Combination therapy
目的 比较拉米夫定( LAM)与阿德福韦酯(ADV)初始联合与恩替卡韦(ETV)单药治疗失代偿期乙型肝炎肝硬化2年的疗效.方法 选取2007年1月-2008年4月浙江省上虞市人民医院和浙江大学医学院附属第一医院120例失代偿期乙型肝炎肝硬化患者作为研究对象,其中60例接受LAM联合ADV初始抗病毒治疗,60例接受ETV单药抗病毒治疗.每1~3个月检测患者肝功能、肾功能、甲胎蛋白、HBV血清学标志物、HBV DNA、凝血酶原时间(PT)、肝脏超声波或CT.采用重复测量方差分析和x2检验比较两组在治疗12和24个月时的疗效、不良反应和累计生存率.结果 LAM和ADV初始联合治疗组和ETV单药治疗组各有45例至随访结束.两组HBV DNA转阴率和ALT复常率在治疗12个月(x2=2.12和2.88,P>0.05)和24个月时(X2=3.21和3.24,P>0.05)差异均无统计学意义;治疗24个月时HBeAg血清学转换率分别为43.5% (10/23)和36.4%( 8/22),差异有统计学意义(x2=4.09,P<0.05).治疗12个月和24个月后,LAM和ADV初始联合组分别有2例(4.4%)和3例(6.7%)发生病毒学突破,但均未检测到病毒学变异;ETV单药组分别有1例(2.2%)和2例(4.4%)发生病毒学突破,并在24个月检测到1例(2.2%)发生病毒变异.LAM+ADV初始联合组和ETV组治疗24个月后分别与治疗前(基线)相比,Alb水平上升(F=18.9和17.3,P<0.05),TBil和ALT下降(F=16.5、17.1和23.7、24.8,P<0.05),PT缩短(F=22.7和24.5,P<0.05),CTP评分和MELD评分下降(F=18.5、17.8和24.2、23.8,P<0.05).LAM和ADV初始联合治疗组累计病死率(或肝移植)为16.7% (10/60),ETV单药组累计病死率(或肝移植)为18.3% (11/60).两组均未发现有血清肌酐超过正常值上限的病例.结论 LAM与ADV初始联合或ETV单药治疗失代偿期乙型肝炎肝硬化患者均能明显抑制HBV复制,改善肝功能,降低病死率,且耐药变异率低;联合组HBeAg血清学转换率在24个月时高于单药组,两种方案在临床上均可使用.
目的 比較拉米伕定( LAM)與阿德福韋酯(ADV)初始聯閤與恩替卡韋(ETV)單藥治療失代償期乙型肝炎肝硬化2年的療效.方法 選取2007年1月-2008年4月浙江省上虞市人民醫院和浙江大學醫學院附屬第一醫院120例失代償期乙型肝炎肝硬化患者作為研究對象,其中60例接受LAM聯閤ADV初始抗病毒治療,60例接受ETV單藥抗病毒治療.每1~3箇月檢測患者肝功能、腎功能、甲胎蛋白、HBV血清學標誌物、HBV DNA、凝血酶原時間(PT)、肝髒超聲波或CT.採用重複測量方差分析和x2檢驗比較兩組在治療12和24箇月時的療效、不良反應和纍計生存率.結果 LAM和ADV初始聯閤治療組和ETV單藥治療組各有45例至隨訪結束.兩組HBV DNA轉陰率和ALT複常率在治療12箇月(x2=2.12和2.88,P>0.05)和24箇月時(X2=3.21和3.24,P>0.05)差異均無統計學意義;治療24箇月時HBeAg血清學轉換率分彆為43.5% (10/23)和36.4%( 8/22),差異有統計學意義(x2=4.09,P<0.05).治療12箇月和24箇月後,LAM和ADV初始聯閤組分彆有2例(4.4%)和3例(6.7%)髮生病毒學突破,但均未檢測到病毒學變異;ETV單藥組分彆有1例(2.2%)和2例(4.4%)髮生病毒學突破,併在24箇月檢測到1例(2.2%)髮生病毒變異.LAM+ADV初始聯閤組和ETV組治療24箇月後分彆與治療前(基線)相比,Alb水平上升(F=18.9和17.3,P<0.05),TBil和ALT下降(F=16.5、17.1和23.7、24.8,P<0.05),PT縮短(F=22.7和24.5,P<0.05),CTP評分和MELD評分下降(F=18.5、17.8和24.2、23.8,P<0.05).LAM和ADV初始聯閤治療組纍計病死率(或肝移植)為16.7% (10/60),ETV單藥組纍計病死率(或肝移植)為18.3% (11/60).兩組均未髮現有血清肌酐超過正常值上限的病例.結論 LAM與ADV初始聯閤或ETV單藥治療失代償期乙型肝炎肝硬化患者均能明顯抑製HBV複製,改善肝功能,降低病死率,且耐藥變異率低;聯閤組HBeAg血清學轉換率在24箇月時高于單藥組,兩種方案在臨床上均可使用.
목적 비교랍미부정( LAM)여아덕복위지(ADV)초시연합여은체잡위(ETV)단약치료실대상기을형간염간경화2년적료효.방법 선취2007년1월-2008년4월절강성상우시인민의원화절강대학의학원부속제일의원120례실대상기을형간염간경화환자작위연구대상,기중60례접수LAM연합ADV초시항병독치료,60례접수ETV단약항병독치료.매1~3개월검측환자간공능、신공능、갑태단백、HBV혈청학표지물、HBV DNA、응혈매원시간(PT)、간장초성파혹CT.채용중복측량방차분석화x2검험비교량조재치료12화24개월시적료효、불량반응화루계생존솔.결과 LAM화ADV초시연합치료조화ETV단약치료조각유45례지수방결속.량조HBV DNA전음솔화ALT복상솔재치료12개월(x2=2.12화2.88,P>0.05)화24개월시(X2=3.21화3.24,P>0.05)차이균무통계학의의;치료24개월시HBeAg혈청학전환솔분별위43.5% (10/23)화36.4%( 8/22),차이유통계학의의(x2=4.09,P<0.05).치료12개월화24개월후,LAM화ADV초시연합조분별유2례(4.4%)화3례(6.7%)발생병독학돌파,단균미검측도병독학변이;ETV단약조분별유1례(2.2%)화2례(4.4%)발생병독학돌파,병재24개월검측도1례(2.2%)발생병독변이.LAM+ADV초시연합조화ETV조치료24개월후분별여치료전(기선)상비,Alb수평상승(F=18.9화17.3,P<0.05),TBil화ALT하강(F=16.5、17.1화23.7、24.8,P<0.05),PT축단(F=22.7화24.5,P<0.05),CTP평분화MELD평분하강(F=18.5、17.8화24.2、23.8,P<0.05).LAM화ADV초시연합치료조루계병사솔(혹간이식)위16.7% (10/60),ETV단약조루계병사솔(혹간이식)위18.3% (11/60).량조균미발현유혈청기항초과정상치상한적병례.결론 LAM여ADV초시연합혹ETV단약치료실대상기을형간염간경화환자균능명현억제HBV복제,개선간공능,강저병사솔,차내약변이솔저;연합조HBeAg혈청학전환솔재24개월시고우단약조,량충방안재림상상균가사용.
Objective To compare the 2-year efficacy of de novo combination therapy with lamivudine (LAM) and adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) to that of entecavir (ETV) monotherapy in treatment of patients with hepatitis B virus ( HBV )-related decompensated cirrhosis.Methods A total of 120 naive patients with HBV-related decompensated cirrhosis admitted to Shangyu People's Hospital and the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University from January 2007 to April 2008 were enrolled,in which 60 were treated with LAM and ADV combination therapy,and other 60 patients were treated with ETV monotherapy.Tests for liver and kidney function,alpha-fetoprotein,HBV serum markers,HBV DNA load,prothrombin time (PT),and ultrasonography or CT scan of liver were performed every 1-3 months.Repeated measure ANOVA and x2test were used to compare the efficacy,side effects and accumulated survival rates at 12 and 24 month in two groups.Results Forty-five patients in each group were followed-up for 24 months.There was no significant difference in HBV DNA negative rates and ALT normalization rates at month 12 (x2 =2.12 and 2.88,P >0.05 ) and month 24 between two groups (x2 =3.21 and 3.24,P > 0.05); while HBeAg seroconversion rate in LAM + ADV group at month 24 was significantly higher than that in ETV group (43.5% vs.36.4%,x2 =4.09,P<0.05).Viral breakthrough occurred in 2 cases (4.4%) by month 12 and 3 cases (6.7%) by month 24 in LAM + ADV group,and no viral mutation was observed; while in ETV group,viral breakthrough occurred in 1 case ( 2.2% ) by month 12 and 2 cases (4.4%) by month 24,and viral mutation was observed in 1 case (2.2%) by month 24.At the end of month 24,increase of AIb (F=18.9 and 17.3,P<0.05),decrease of TBil and ALT (F=16.5,17.1 and 23.7,24.8,P <0.05 ),shortening of PT ( F =22.7 and 24.5,P < 0.05 ),and the improvements of CTP and MELD scores (F=18.5,17.8 and 24.2,23.8,P<0.05) were observed in both groups.The accumulative rates of mortality or liver transplantation were 16.7% ( 10/60 ) and 18.3% ( 11/60 ) in LAM + ADV and ETV groups,respectively.No blood creatinine increased above the normal upper limit was observed in both groups.Conclusion Both LAM + ADV combination therapy and ETV monotherapy can effectively inhibit HBV replication,improve liver function,decrease mortality and viral resistance,but the 24-month HBeAg seroconversion rate in combination therapy group is higher than that in monotherapy group.