中华现代护理杂志
中華現代護理雜誌
중화현대호리잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF MODERN NURSING
2012年
16期
1892-1895
,共4页
赖秀梅%廖小乔%吴萌芽%李玉平
賴秀梅%廖小喬%吳萌芽%李玉平
뢰수매%료소교%오맹아%리옥평
灭菌%成本分析%包装材料
滅菌%成本分析%包裝材料
멸균%성본분석%포장재료
Sterilization%Cost analysis%Packaging material
目的 探讨不同包装材料、不同包装方法在物品灭菌、阻菌的效果及成本构成,为寻找灭菌效果好且成本低廉的灭菌包装材料提供理论依据.方法 分别用5种包装材料共8种包装方法包装物品后进行消毒灭菌.分别于灭菌当天,保存14,21,30,60,90,150,180d 随机抽取各组试验包进行无菌检测,比较8组灭菌效果、保存时间及成本.结果 8组包装方法均能达到无菌效果;医用皱纹纸、医用无纺布、医用立体纸袋、纸塑包装灭菌后保存时间均优于棉布类包装;双层棉布1次包装成本消耗分别与单层医用皱纹纸或医用无纺布1次包装、医用立体纸袋包装、纸塑包装比较,差异均有统计学意义(t分别为27.9,25.3,22.7;P<0.01).双层棉布2次包装成本消耗分别与医用皱纹纸或医用无纺布单层2次包装、医用立体纸袋包装、纸塑包装比较,差异均有统计学意义(t分别为24.5,28.2,26.4;P<0.01).结论 一次性医用皱纹纸、医用无纺布、医用立体纸袋、纸塑包装具有良好的灭菌和阻菌效果,其包装成本明显低于棉布类包装,作为复用医疗器械灭菌包装材料占有绝对优势.
目的 探討不同包裝材料、不同包裝方法在物品滅菌、阻菌的效果及成本構成,為尋找滅菌效果好且成本低廉的滅菌包裝材料提供理論依據.方法 分彆用5種包裝材料共8種包裝方法包裝物品後進行消毒滅菌.分彆于滅菌噹天,保存14,21,30,60,90,150,180d 隨機抽取各組試驗包進行無菌檢測,比較8組滅菌效果、保存時間及成本.結果 8組包裝方法均能達到無菌效果;醫用皺紋紙、醫用無紡佈、醫用立體紙袋、紙塑包裝滅菌後保存時間均優于棉佈類包裝;雙層棉佈1次包裝成本消耗分彆與單層醫用皺紋紙或醫用無紡佈1次包裝、醫用立體紙袋包裝、紙塑包裝比較,差異均有統計學意義(t分彆為27.9,25.3,22.7;P<0.01).雙層棉佈2次包裝成本消耗分彆與醫用皺紋紙或醫用無紡佈單層2次包裝、醫用立體紙袋包裝、紙塑包裝比較,差異均有統計學意義(t分彆為24.5,28.2,26.4;P<0.01).結論 一次性醫用皺紋紙、醫用無紡佈、醫用立體紙袋、紙塑包裝具有良好的滅菌和阻菌效果,其包裝成本明顯低于棉佈類包裝,作為複用醫療器械滅菌包裝材料佔有絕對優勢.
목적 탐토불동포장재료、불동포장방법재물품멸균、조균적효과급성본구성,위심조멸균효과호차성본저렴적멸균포장재료제공이론의거.방법 분별용5충포장재료공8충포장방법포장물품후진행소독멸균.분별우멸균당천,보존14,21,30,60,90,150,180d 수궤추취각조시험포진행무균검측,비교8조멸균효과、보존시간급성본.결과 8조포장방법균능체도무균효과;의용추문지、의용무방포、의용입체지대、지소포장멸균후보존시간균우우면포류포장;쌍층면포1차포장성본소모분별여단층의용추문지혹의용무방포1차포장、의용입체지대포장、지소포장비교,차이균유통계학의의(t분별위27.9,25.3,22.7;P<0.01).쌍층면포2차포장성본소모분별여의용추문지혹의용무방포단층2차포장、의용입체지대포장、지소포장비교,차이균유통계학의의(t분별위24.5,28.2,26.4;P<0.01).결론 일차성의용추문지、의용무방포、의용입체지대、지소포장구유량호적멸균화조균효과,기포장성본명현저우면포류포장,작위복용의료기계멸균포장재료점유절대우세.
Objective To investigate the effect of sterilization and cost of different packaging materials and packing patterns,with a view to provide evidences for looking for packing materials with low-cost and perfect sterilization effect.Methods Five kinds of packaging materials and eight kinds of packaging methods were used to pack goods which was sent to sterilize after packing.Then examined part of packs on 14,21,30,60,90,150,180 days after sterilizing,respectively.The effect of sterilization,preservation time and cost were compared among the eight groups.Results All of the eight packing methods had reached the sterile effect.Preservation time of medical creps paper,medical nonwoven fabrics,medical three-dimensional paper bag and paper plastic package all of which had sterilized was longer than cotton package.One time packing of doubledeck cotton was compared with monolayer medical crepe paper,one time of packing of medical nonwoven fabrics,medical three-dimensional paper bag and paper plastic package for the cost,respectively.the differences were significant (t=27.9,25.3,22.7,respectively; P < 0.01 ).Two times of packing of doubledeck cotton was compared with medical crepe paper,two times of packing of medical nonwoven fabrics,medical three-dimensional paper bag and paper plastic package for the cost,respectively,the differences were obvious (t=24.5,28.2,26.4,respectively;P<0.01).Conclusions Disposable medical crepe paper type,medical non-woven type,three-dimensional medical bag type,paper and plastic packaging has good resistance bacteria sterilization effect,the packaging costs are significantly lower than the cotton packing,it has an absolute advantage as re-sterilization packaging of medical devices.