中华行为医学与脑科学杂志
中華行為醫學與腦科學雜誌
중화행위의학여뇌과학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE AND BRAIN SCIENCE
2010年
2期
178-181
,共4页
朱燕波%杜金行%林琳%折笠秀树%陈柯帆%郑洁%贺琳%李春岩%方芳%骆晓霞
硃燕波%杜金行%林琳%摺笠秀樹%陳柯帆%鄭潔%賀琳%李春巖%方芳%駱曉霞
주연파%두금행%림림%절립수수%진가범%정길%하림%리춘암%방방%락효하
明尼苏达心功能不全生命质量量表%中文版%信度%效度
明尼囌達心功能不全生命質量量錶%中文版%信度%效度
명니소체심공능불전생명질량량표%중문판%신도%효도
MLHFQ%Chinese version%Reliability%Validity
目的 研制明尼苏达心功能不全生命质量量表(MLHFQ)中文版.并进行临床试用.方法 按照外国语量表汉化为中文版本的标准化程序研制MLHFQ中文版,并对北京市3所综合医院招募的83名住院病人进行测试分析.结果 MLHFQ的Cronbach's α系数在综合分及身体领域、情绪领域均>0.80;MLHFQ前后2次调查各条目的 加权kappa系数在0.48～0.84之间,综合分、身体领域、情绪领域的Spearman相关系数在0.88～0.94之间.MLHFQ与NYHA心功能分级显著相关(P<0.05),MLHFQ综合分及身体领域、情绪领域与简明健康状况调查问卷(SF-36)的相应维度中高度相关(-0.73～-0.59).因子分析显示3个因子解释总变异的49.34%.中西医结合治疗前后的MLHFQ得分为:身体领域[(26.15±7.15)分,(17.63±8.50)分],情绪领域[(8.96±5.73)分,(6.81±5.31)分],综合得分[(56.38±16.88)分,(39.77±15.69)分],均差异有显著性(P<0.01).结论 MLHFQ中文版研制过程和方法规范,信度和效度评价良好,可作为临床测量工具.
目的 研製明尼囌達心功能不全生命質量量錶(MLHFQ)中文版.併進行臨床試用.方法 按照外國語量錶漢化為中文版本的標準化程序研製MLHFQ中文版,併對北京市3所綜閤醫院招募的83名住院病人進行測試分析.結果 MLHFQ的Cronbach's α繫數在綜閤分及身體領域、情緒領域均>0.80;MLHFQ前後2次調查各條目的 加權kappa繫數在0.48～0.84之間,綜閤分、身體領域、情緒領域的Spearman相關繫數在0.88～0.94之間.MLHFQ與NYHA心功能分級顯著相關(P<0.05),MLHFQ綜閤分及身體領域、情緒領域與簡明健康狀況調查問捲(SF-36)的相應維度中高度相關(-0.73～-0.59).因子分析顯示3箇因子解釋總變異的49.34%.中西醫結閤治療前後的MLHFQ得分為:身體領域[(26.15±7.15)分,(17.63±8.50)分],情緒領域[(8.96±5.73)分,(6.81±5.31)分],綜閤得分[(56.38±16.88)分,(39.77±15.69)分],均差異有顯著性(P<0.01).結論 MLHFQ中文版研製過程和方法規範,信度和效度評價良好,可作為臨床測量工具.
목적 연제명니소체심공능불전생명질량량표(MLHFQ)중문판.병진행림상시용.방법 안조외국어량표한화위중문판본적표준화정서연제MLHFQ중문판,병대북경시3소종합의원초모적83명주원병인진행측시분석.결과 MLHFQ적Cronbach's α계수재종합분급신체영역、정서영역균>0.80;MLHFQ전후2차조사각조목적 가권kappa계수재0.48～0.84지간,종합분、신체영역、정서영역적Spearman상관계수재0.88～0.94지간.MLHFQ여NYHA심공능분급현저상관(P<0.05),MLHFQ종합분급신체영역、정서영역여간명건강상황조사문권(SF-36)적상응유도중고도상관(-0.73～-0.59).인자분석현시3개인자해석총변이적49.34%.중서의결합치료전후적MLHFQ득분위:신체영역[(26.15±7.15)분,(17.63±8.50)분],정서영역[(8.96±5.73)분,(6.81±5.31)분],종합득분[(56.38±16.88)분,(39.77±15.69)분],균차이유현저성(P<0.01).결론 MLHFQ중문판연제과정화방법규범,신도화효도평개량호,가작위림상측량공구.
Objective To edit Chinese version of the Minnesota living with heart failure questionnaire (MLHFQ) and to estimate its reliability and validity.Metheds Translated and edited the Chinese version of MLHFQ according to the standard procedures,and tested 83 inpatients which were recruited from three polyclinics of Beijing district in China.Results Cronbach's alpha consistency was>0.80 for the three MLHFQ scores.Reproducibility ranged from 0.48 to 0.84 for items of weighted kappa coefficient and from 0.88 to 0.94 for three do-mains of Spearman's correlation coefficient.MLHFQ scores varied significantly with NYHA functional class(P<0.05),and there were intermediate-to-high correlations with the assumed corresponding SF-36 domains(-0.73 to -0.59).Factor analysis revealed three-factor structure explained 49.34% of the total variance.The MLHFQ scores before and after the treatment combined TCM and western medicine were significant (physical domain (26.15±7.15,17.63±8.50),emotional domain (8.96±5.73,6.8l±5.31),overall score(56.38±16.88,39.77±15.69) all P<0.01).Conclusions The Chinese version of MLHFQ is translated and edited according to the standard procedures.Its reliability and validity is good,and could be used as a clinical outcome measurement.
